Wiggle has rejected allegations of plagiarism brought against it by Anna Glowinski, founder of women’s cycle clothing business Ana Nichoola, who had accused the online retailer on Friday of copying the star pattern used in a number of her designs for one of the products in the Blok range produced by its dhb in-house brand.
Over the weekend, Wiggle, which had come under criticism on social media as a result of Glowinski’s claims, promised that it would investigate the issue today and publish its findings, and did so this evening in a post on Facebook.
The online retailer, which said it has a “zero tolerance” approach to plagiarism, insisted that “no designer employed by us (directly or indirectly) has broken any of our policies or, more importantly, contravened our values.”
On Friday evening, designer, cyclist and TV presenter Glowinski had said she was “angry” and “heartbroken” after seeing dhb’s Superstar jersey, noting that Wiggle staff had met her at her office and studio around 18 months ago. She accused it of "copying" her design.
She said that she showed them some of her designs, and that they had later spoken about her collaborating with the company, but Wiggle decided not to proceed with that.
In a detailed statement which you can read in full below, maintained that the discussions with her involved its buying team which it says operates separately from the dhb design team, and that the latter “had no knowledge of any conversation with Anna Glowinski, nor any sight of her designs.”
Wiggle added: “We have shared this statement with Anna before publishing and have offered to meet up and take her though our design process and all of our inspiration material.
“We appreciate that the coincidence of the designs might have been puzzling for her, though there are so many designs in the marketplace today that it is unsurprising that these similarities coincidently appear from time to time.”
At the time of writing, Glowinski has not yet responded to Wiggle’s statement on either her Twitter feed or Facebook page.
Here is Wiggle’s statement in full:
Hi friends of Wiggle.
As promised, following our internal investigation here is our statement regarding Anna Glowinski.
At Wiggle we pride ourselves on our integrity, fairness and transparency. Therefore we have taken the claim made by Anna Glowinski (through Facebook on Friday 24th October 2014) that we have plagiarised one of her designs for our new dhb ‘Superstar’ Jersey very seriously.
After conducting a detailed and thorough internal investigation we have concluded that no plagiarism has occurred and that no designer employed by us (directly or indirectly) has broken any of our policies or, more importantly, contravened our values.
We categorically do not participate in or condone plagiarism under any circumstances. This is a zero tolerance policy for us. Our review gives us full confidence in our internal processes and the integrity of our staff in ensuring that this could not happen. We thank our colleagues for their openness and support in resolving this issue in a timely manner.
As this story is in the public domain, for our customers’ information and on behalf of our hard working colleagues that have been affected by this story, we layout our key findings below:
• On 17/1/2013, Anna Glowinski met with members of our Cycle Clothing Buying team at the London Bicycle Show at Excel.
• On 24/1/2013, Anna Glowinski sent a proposal to our Cycle Clothing Buying team regarding the possibility of her designing an exclusive collection for Wiggle.
• On 12/7/2013 our Cycle Clothing Buying team met with Anna to discuss this potential collaboration.
• On 7/8/2013, having reviewed Anna’s proposal, our Cycle Clothing Buying team emailed Anna, politely declining to range the product and sharing our feedback with her.
• On 21/7/2014, following her resignation from AnaNichoola, Anna Glowinski contacted our Cycle Clothing Buying team again, enquiring if there was the possibility of her working for Wiggle. We considered this kind offer carefully, but again decided to decline this proposal. No designs or products were discussed in these subsequent communications.
• It is important to highlight that our Cycle Clothing Buying team (based in Portsmouth) work independently from our dhb Design Team (based in London). There has never until this investigation been a conversation between these two teams at Wiggle regarding Anna Glowinski or AnaNichoola.
• Therefore it is unsurprising that in parallel (and unrelated to) the conversations and meetings between Anna and our Cycle Clothing Buying Team, our London based dhb Design team were independently working on our Autumn/Winter 2014 range, including our ‘Superstar’ Jersey. We register the intellectual property of all of our designs and to do this must save all of the ‘inspiration materials’ and initial ‘draft designs’. We can confirm with confidence by reviewing this audit trail, that the dhb Design team had no knowledge of any conversation with Anna Glowinski, nor any sight of her designs. Additionally, there had been no communication between our Portsmouth Cycle Clothing Buying Team and our London dhb Design Team relating to this new range.
• The inspiration for the Superstar Jersey (and indeed the other designs in our dhb Blok range, which it forms part of) involved many influences, including national flags and jockey jerseys – absolutely none of which could be traced from AnaNichoola or Anna Glowinski. To be clear the dhb Design team have never been in contact with Anna Glowinski or AnaNichoola Ltd at any stage.
We have shared this statement with Anna before publishing and have offered to meet up and take her though our design process and all of our inspiration material. We appreciate that the coincidence of the designs might have been puzzling for her, though there are so many designs in the marketplace today that it is unsurprising that these similarities coincidently appear from time to time. We wish Anna every success in her new endeavors.
We would also like to take this opportunity to reassure our loyal customers that we, as ever, stay true to the core ethics and principles that have led to our success to date and thank them for their continued support and custom.
Thanks for reading.
Wiggle.
Add new comment
47 comments
Certainly professional and thorough. But I don't find it that convincing to be honest.
Their two teams are based in London and Portsmouth so couldn't have talked to each other. How long does the stagecoach take to get from London to Portsmouth nowadays?
They have some 'inspiration materials' to back up their design. Not hard to reverse engineer this if you want to.
At the end of the day AnaNichoola has been producing stuff with the stars theme for a number of years. Are Wiggle really saying they've never seen it?
She doesn't have exclusive rights to using stars...
I don't care, it's a goddam fugly design either way.
Having followed this with interest I think Wiggle have been extremely profession throughout.
My judgement from what I have seen from the 2 stories on road.cc is that Wiggle have acted with integrity and professionalism.
Yes, there are similarities, but as so many have said...it's a jersey with stars on....it's not really ground breaking is it as the combination of the 2 have been around for quite sometime.
It is strange however that those who have shouted out in defense of Anna didn't get so emotional when TEAM PIE released their Team Sky rip off jersey or scream out in disgust on the forum threads where people have bought CHINESE COPIES of PINNARELLOs!?!?
I'd actually say the latter is far worse!!
Anna got ripped by wiggle. But if you dance with the devil, you really can't complain, when he steps on your toes and forgets your name...
She jumped the gun and now looks foolish!
I'd also add to that they promised a response, gave notice of the time of that response and met it.
That's high risk. It may have taken longer than they anticipated and it's so easy to have to say "sorry, not quite done yet."
They got through a lot today. AND they sent my Sidi's out. (After price matching them).
All jests aside, I am pretty surprised by the professionalism of Wiggle's response. Clearly took Anna Glowinski very seriously, and refuted her (as well as their history talking with her) without taking any potshots at all.
The bit where they say she asked for a job and they turned her down was a bit unnecessary though. Didn't seem to have anything to do with the claim and seemed to me they included it to embarrass her. I can imagine the guy writing the press release with a bit of a smug face writing that section.
I'm not sure it necessarily means that. The use of "again" and "working for Wiggle" could equally mean designing for. Perhaps not the best choice of words I agree. But, in effect, they set a context and ensure that they have covered off all approaches.
Sounds like a scorned business women who had one too many red wines on Friday.
I have loved the bandwagon jumping that has gone on against any successful business, even one that gives a lot back to cycling.
No wonder Wiggle didnt want to employ her
Of course there's no record of "inspiration materials" - any designer who included such an obviously similar design on their mood board would be in for a proper bollocking.
I suspect it's not the first time Wiggle have done this - have a look at DHB's Southsea jacket, then Surface's Aquaphobic jacket and tell me if you can spot the difference.
http://sfgfc.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/dhb-s-sea-zoom.jpg?w=400&h=400
http://www.discountcyclesdirect.co.uk/images/surface_aquaphobic_wool_gre...
Both look exactly like my Berghaus RG1 jacket.
How was Wiggle's polyester jacket copying Surface's wool one, out of interest?
The arms. Didn't you notice that the Wiggle jacket had *exactly* the same number of arms as the Surface? I'd certainly like to see evidence of their *inspiration* for that one!
Similar cut and collar, but I don't think anyone would get them mixed up, even on a very dark night.
I can;t be bothered to dig out a review of the Surface jacket, but IIRC it was mainly made from synthetics too. Both feature a sort of faux-tweed fabric, and look very similar, give or take a Napoleon pocket. Did you actually click the links?
Yeah, I did. They look very much like the chic, happening, hipster jackets that were all the rage a few years back.
Here's some more views:
http://road.cc/content/review/17147-dhb-southsea-jacket
http://road.cc/content/review/50600-surface-hydrophobic-wool-jacket
http://cdn.mos.bikeradar.com/images/bikes-and-gear/clothing/jackets/1261...
http://cdn.mos.bikeradar.com/images/bikes-and-gear/clothing/jackets/1257...
I dunno. They both look like casual jackets to me. And, I think I prefer the DHB one. For wandering down the pub anyway.
After being so quick to whip up publictiy on this after sending her initial complaint to wiggle at 11pm, and therefore giving them no reasonable chance to reply, how long do you think it will take her to post an apology?
Shes certainly made herself ripe for a libel action.
Pages