Trials have begun of driverless vehicles on a section of the Thames Path on the Greenwich Peninsula in southeast London. The government hopes they can transform urban transport, but with the tests forcing the temporary suspension of a cycle path, could any eventual widespread adoption affect the allocation of space for cycling?
The Royal Borough of Greenwich last year successfully bid for an £8 million grant to test three different types of the vehicles in partnership with the Transport Research Laboratory and the University of Greenwich.
The following video, posted to YouTube by Visit Greenwich yesterday, shows the trial of a driverless ‘pod’ supplied by Phoenix Wings under way on a cycle path between the O2 Arena – formerly the Millennium Dome – and John Harrison Way on the eastern side of the peninsula.
Earlier, concerns had been raised on Twitter by local blogger Darryl Chamberlain about the closure of the cycle path, although the footage shows that there is still ample space for cyclists and pedestrians to share space safely.
The trial, one of three being conducted and which address driverless vehicles' suitability not only on public highways but also as potentially part of separate transit system, does raise the question of whether the same might apply in more central locations with less space and higher footfall.
Funding for the pilot, as well as similar tests in Bristol, Coventry and Milton Keynes, was confirmed by Chancellor George Osborne in December’s Autumn Statement.
Nick Jones, lead technologist for the low carbon vehicle innovation platform at the government’s innovation agency, Innovate UK, said at the time: “Cars that drive themselves would represent the most significant transformation in road travel since the introduction of the internal combustion engine and at Innovate UK, we want to help the UK to lead the world in making that happen.
“There are so many new and exciting technologies that can come together to make driverless cars a reality, but it’s vital that trials are carried out safely, that the public have confidence in that technology and we learn everything we can through the trials so that legal, regulation and protection issues don’t get in the way in the future,” he added.
The trials are aimed at convincing both the car industry and the public of the potential of driverless vehicles, with details of the individual schemes set out below.
Greenwich
The GATEway project is based in Greenwich, South East London, and will model how driverless cars could be implemented in London, and further afield. Led by the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), testing will include automated electric shuttle vehicles, a demonstration of tele-operated driving and a simulated 3D model of the Greenwich peninsula. The project also aims to leave the legacy of a driverless vehicle test environment in Greenwich attracting international manufacturers and associated industries to the UK.
Coventry/Milton Keynes
UK Autodrive will be based jointly in Milton Keynes and Coventry. The programme will involve the demonstration of road-going cars and lightweight self-driving pods designed for pedestrianised spaces, and will be delivered on behalf of the UK by the City of Milton Keynes working in association with the City of Coventry. Other partners in the programme include JLR, Tata, Ford, RDM, Thales (UK), AXA, Wragge-Lawrence-Graham, Oxford University, Cambridge University, the Open University, and the new Transport Systems Catapult. Consulting group Arup has devised the programme and will provide programme management and technical co-ordination skills.
Bristol
The VENTURER consortium have joined forces to trial autonomous vehicles in Bristol, investigating the legal and insurance aspects of driverless cars and exploring how the public react to such vehicles. This programme aims to deepen understanding of the impact on road users and wider society and open up new opportunities for our economy and society. Bristol is surrounded by challenging terrain which will provide important data that can be used to successfully introduce driverless cars in cities and towns across the UK to reduce congestion, improve air quality and use roads more efficiently and safely.
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
As the driverless Pod is clearly driving down and taking up 75% of the cycle-section of the shared facility...
Question 1. If you use the pedestrian side of the facility to overtake it/avoid a head on collision are you committing an offence in the eyes of a PCSO?
Question2. Without a driver, who is responsible for the actions of the passengers?
Just asking.
1. Yes
2. The company who owns the vehicle and their public liability insurance company.
Add new comment
32 comments
1. Yes
2. The company who owns the vehicle and their public liability insurance company.
JUDGEMENT DAY IS NEAR!!!!!!
Pages