Sir Dave Brailsford says the UCI should pay for independent anti-doping experts to be embedded within leading teams to help prove that riders aren’t cheating.
The Team Sky principal’s comments, reported by BBC Sport, follow a weekend in which Tour de France race leader Chris Froome had urine thrown at him by a spectator who shouted out, “doper!”
Froome has had to field questions about whether he is riding clean throughout this year’s race, just as he did two years ago when he claimed the overall victory.
Speaking on the France Télévisions show Stade 2, Brailsford, who last week claimed Froome’s training data had been hacked by people trying prove he is doping, said: "It is not possible to prove a negative. I can't. But I can work with the UCI, independent experts."
He continued: "I understand people asking 'do we believe in Chris Froome?'
"How can we find a test where we say 'we are clean'? We have responsibility to be transparent.
"I would like the UCI to invest in individuals and put them into each team 24/7. That would prove we do nothing. I'm ready to do it.
"It is not fair what has been said. Chris is special. He has a special physiology. But he doesn't cheat."
Whether Brailsford’s suggestion is workable is open to question.
With 17 UCI WorldTour teams alone, it would certainly be expensive, perhaps prohibitively so for the UCI – if there were enough suitably qualified people to staff such an operation in the first place.
Moreover, with teams sometimes participating in three races concurrently and other riders elsewhere, for example on training camps, it would be impossible to keep tabs on everyone all the time.
Froome himself has pointed the finger at French ex-pros turned TV pundits Cedric Vasseur and Lauren Jalabert as helping fuel suspicions about him.
The latter’s insinuations were summarised by ITV 4 yesterday – although Jalabert wasn’t too keen to elaborate on them when pressed by Matt Rendell, as shown in this video posted to YouTube by a user named Michelle F.
Add new comment
62 comments
Well played ITV4, the Matt Rendell video is a small step towards redressing the balance. I don't know if Sky dope or not (I hope they don't), so I will keep my mouth shut about it until proof either way is forthcoming........... Something maybe Jalabert should've considered.
I agree with everything you say. Except in my case, I'll assume Sky isn't doping until there is proof that they aren't - its literally impossible to prove 100% they are not doping, only that they are (if they are). I couldn't prove I wasn't doping either - any test or study of any kind that showed I or Sky were not doping, would merely be seen as "not yet having found proof that I was doping". What's sad about this situation this year, is that the same people weren't talking about riders being doped when French riders where packing the top 10 last year, even as Nibali rode away with the race. Suddenly the French are having a rotten tour (bad luck has played its part as well) and the grapes suddenly taste very sour...
Pages