The RAC's annual survey of motorists has been published, giving an insight into the behaviour and attitudes of those who drive on Britain's roads, with thoughts on cycling infrastructure, cyclist behaviour, replacing vehicle journeys with bicycle miles, and last year's Highway Code changes again featuring prominently.
It notes that in adapting to high fuel and electricity costs 20 per cent of drivers have tried to replace vehicle trips with walking or cycling where possible. Elsewhere, more than half of drivers (53 per cent) said they now generally walk or cycle short journeys, a similar figure to in 2022 (52 per cent).
Despite this, the RAC suggests the "UK's drivers remain highly reliant on their vehicles" and 82 per cent agreed with a statement that they would "find it very difficult to adjust to life without a car". In less densely populated areas, this figure was as high as 91 per cent.
> Cycle more, drive less once pandemic ends, urges AA president
A majority of drivers (55 per cent) did say they would be willing to use public transport for more journeys if the reliability, convenience or affordability was better.
The report suggests that around a quarter of drivers are also cyclists (23 per cent), with 12 per cent using their bikes at least once a month, a percentage which is the same as it was last year.
When it came to cycling-related measures that might reduce car dependency, just 24 per cent of drivers in urban areas, and 18 per cent in rural locations, believe more segregated cycle lanes would be effective, while just 15 per cent of urban drivers and eight per cent of rural drivers said the same about bike rental schemes.
In the section examining drivers' top concerns, a fifth (20 per cent) said cyclist behaviour was their "top concern".
"Legislation will just have to keep playing catch-up"
One concerning part of the report came when looking at non-compliance of road rules, with almost half (49 per cent) of under 25s surveyed admitting to "using a handheld phone for calls while driving", up from 34 per cent in 2022.
"Shockingly", the RAC says, 30 per cent of under 25s asked said they had engaged in a video call while driving, almost double the reported 17 per cent amount in 2022. In the same age group, 19 per cent said they had taken a photo or a video while driving.
And when looking at all drivers, 60 per cent said they had used their phone while in stationary traffic, while 12 per cent claimed they could safely use a mobile phone and drive at the same time.
"It is possible that some of the public messaging relating to the dangers of phone use that was so effective in increasing compliance from 2017 onwards needs to be repeated for the benefit of the younger generation," the RAC's report suggests.
Tony Kildare, chief executive, IAM RoadSmart added: "The huge increase in video calls when driving shows once again that if phones have new features then young people, in particular, will use them and legislation will just have to keep playing catch-up."
On the topic of speeding, 57 per cent said they oppose reducing the default urban speed limit to 20mph, as has happened recently in Wales. Just 24 per cent support the policy, a figure that rises to 33 per cent among urban drivers.
Highway Code changes
Unfortunately the report only views last year's Highway Code changes from the viewpoint of pedestrian safety, but does still highlight that 71 per cent say they now give way to pedestrians
However, despite this, only 24 per cent said that when they are on foot they find other drivers willing to let them cross in such situations now covered by the Highway Code.
Just 18 per cent of those asked believed the changes had improved pedestrian safety, while almost a third (31 per cent) actually believe that pedestrians are now less safe as a result.
Add new comment
64 comments
if only we could move from "not trying to kill you" to "trying not to kill you". from indifference to actively trying to be safe around vulnerable road users
Thinking through wording people I talk to use (in the real world, not on here) most of them appear to be worried about hitting a cyclist* - guessing that is their "concern": damage they might inflict, rather than damage they might receive.
Given how safe they are inside their metal-safety-box, I can understand that being their biggest concern. It is mine when I drive.
*Pedestrians are probably seen as less of a concern, as they are normally found on a pavement
Could the 'cyclist behaviour' that concerns drivers be cyclists just existing, cyclists delaying their journey by a few seconds or cyclists reporting them for phone use, red light jumping and other types of dangerous driving? Of course it could just be the lycra 😉
I honestly believe a lot of it is just seeing people who've paid 1% of the cost of their vehicle (say £500 vs a £50,000 Range Rover) getting to their destination in half the time or better. Got to make you feel a bit of a chump and so angry...
Pages