Paul Brown, the driver who was eating a sandwich at the time he hit and killed cyclist Joe Wilkins, has been sentenced to 240 hours community service for causing death by careless driving.
He is also required to perform four sessions of restorative justice within 12 months and was also disqualified for driving for 12 months.
Wilkins’ partner, Nicci Saunders, told the Oxford Mail: “The fact the judge put this case in the lower level of careless driving is just a joke really. For what he has done, and generally for people who do that, there needs to be a prison sentence. A year ban is just no punishment.”
Miss Saunders said that drivers found guilty of causing death by careless driving should be banned for at least five years.
“At the end of the day he can carry on with his life almost as normal. It is for life for us,” she said, adding that their two children wake up crying and can’t remember what their dad looked like.
“These girls will never have their dad around – their lives and mine will never be the same. How do you keep the memory alive when they are that young and are forgetting already?
“It is hard work dealing with all this. I do not have many happy days but I try to be happy for the kids. Today I feel numb and just really let down.”
Careless driving
Mr Brown admitted causing death by careless driving, but was acquitted by a jury of causing death by dangerous driving.
In passing sentence at Oxford Crown Court on Tuesday, Recorder Andrew Burrows said that although Mr Brown had been holding a sandwich at the time of the crash, his eyes had been on the road.
Recorder Burrows said: “In my view this falls significantly below that of dangerous driving.
“You simply did not see Joseph Wilkins in the darkness until it was too late, albeit you ought to have seen him before you did and then taken the simple evasive action necessary to avoid him.
“You broke down sobbing in the witness box in the trial and express deep remorse for what you have done and deep sympathy for Joseph Wilkins’s family.”
Causing death by careless driving carries a maximum sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment, while the more serious offence of causing death by dangerous driving can result in a maximum jail term of 14 years.
Sentencing review
Causing death by careless driving carries a maximum sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment. The more serious offence of causing death by dangerous driving can result in a maximum jail term of 14 years.
The case is the latest in a long line in which drivers convicted of killing cyclists have received what many perceive as too lenient a sentence.
Representatives of British Cycling, CTC and RoadPeace last year met with justice minister Helen Grant to call for thorough investigation and tougher sentencing in cases where a vulnerable road user is the victim.
They also urged that improvements be made to the support provided to the families left behind. Also at that meeting was the brother of British Cycling employee, Rob Jefferies, killed on a training ride in Dorset in 2011 by a 17-year-old driver who had passed his test six months earlier and who already had a speeding conviction. He received a non-custodial sentence.
In its largely disappointing response to the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group’s Get Britain Cycling report, the Government said it will initiate a review of sentencing in cases involving cyclists and pedestrians in the new year.
The review of sentencing guidelines, which will be accompanied by a consultation, will be carried out by the Sentencing Council, an independent non-departmental public body of the Ministry of Justice. It will cover the offences of causing death by careless driving and causing death or serious injury by dangerous driving. Proposals will be subject to a formal consultation.
Reacting to the announcement of the sentencing review, Martin Gibbs, Director of Policy and Legal Affairs at British Cycling, said: "We need everybody to feel properly protected by the criminal justice system when travelling on the road.
"We’ve been asking the government for months for a review of sentencing guidelines so I’m glad to see that confirmed, though it should form part of a comprehensive review of the criminal justice process, which all too often fails people on bikes by not prosecuting or by returning sentences which don’t reflect the seriousness of the crime.
"We have been meeting with Ministry of Justice and the Department for Transport to push for improvements but progress has been slow.
“This announcement means that positive steps are being taken and is a victory for British Cycling and its members.”
Add new comment
37 comments
Dangerous driving implies a recklessness and an inevitability of an accident, careless merely suggests that his driving was not up to standard (you're not f#cking kidding). In this instance 'careless' is correct IMO - but it's the sentence for the 'death by' part that is insulting.
ridiculous sentence yet again, the carnage goes on. I read another report which said the cyclist didn't have any lights on his bike in the dark. Is that true?
Oh well, the driver was really sorry, so that's alright.
Eating a sandwich: How does that impair eyesight and impair ones ability to use a brake pedal?
Is the sandwich really that relevant? When one considers by his own account his "eyes were on the road", and the investigation states the cyclist was visible for at least 174m in front of him?
Eating a sandwich means you have to concentrate on 2 things at once, takes your hand away from being able to control the car and limits your reaction time when something does occur.
If not concentrating 100% while controlling a 2 tonne lump moving at at 100kmph things can go badly wrong quickly as this cyclist found out by paying his life.
Any other than concentrating on the road is dangerous because the consciences are lethal. So so sad the law doesn't agree....
also
"Forensic collision investigator PC James Henderson told the court visibility was “good” and tests showed the bike would have been first seen from 174 metres, giving 6.5 seconds reaction time."
174m sounds like a lot but 6.5sec is not that long...
how is this not dangerous driving? A man is dead!
Could that sandwich not have waited til he got to his destination?
I had a sandwich recently, on a long drive to North Wales. I had it in a service station, because i'm not an idiot.
The scary thing is, I ride Eaton Road quite often, and think of it as a nice safe country road, which I enjoy riding. Yet someone being "careless" could kill me, because "mmm sandwich" is more important to them.
Crikey they really can’t like him if they sentenced him to that much he must have really annoyed the judge. FFS when will this bollocks end? Maybe a judge or ministers child or family member will be the only way for change.
Pages