Chris Boardman is no stranger to igniting debates on social media, nor finding himself at the centre of one – most famously, perhaps, when he went for a bike ride on BBC Breakfast with presenter Louise Minchin, resulting in a flood of complaints about the fact he wasn’t wearing a cycle helmet.
> Complaints over bare-headed Chris Boardman’s helmetless BBC Breakfast bike ride
However, at the end of this most unusual of years, it was a Boxing Day Twitter post from the former Olympic and world champion turned cycling campaigner on the subject of mudguards that has sparked what he termed the “most controversial” debate he’s been involved in this year.
17 of the best mudguard – find out how to stay dry on any type of bike
Posting a picture on the social network yesterday of a Boardman ADV 9.0 adventure bike, he asked: “To fit mudguards or not to fit mudguards? That is the question. It’s a heart v head call.”
> Boardman updates ADV 9.0 Carbon bike for UK gravel adventures
Subsequently, Boardman tweeted: “In 2020, I’ve posted on the climate crisis, pollution, health crisis and transport justice. This one on whether to fit mudguards has proved by far the most controversial.”
And boy, did his original tweet polarise opinion. Here’s a selection of some of the 400-plus responses he received, starting with cycling commentator Ant McCrossan and Velocast's John Galloway succinctly expressing views at opposing ends of the spectrum.
By the way, the Boardman ADV 9.0, which comes with Shimano’s GRX gravel-specific groupset, is designed as much for riding on muddy towpaths and bridleways as it is for cycling on the road – and although you can’t see them in the pictures, it does have hidden mudguard mounts.
Although not every owner realises that, apparently ...
So, where do you stand on the issue? Are mudguards an essential fitting during the wetter months to keep yourself and fellow riders free from the mud and splashing surface water, or is there more of a "heart versus head" thing going on, as Boardman says, with a trade-off between keeping the lines of your bike clean at the expense of getting everything else dirty? Let us know in the comments below.
Add new comment
41 comments
Velo Orange, Honjo or Gilles Berthoud mudguards for us. Fine with the aesthetics with a steel frame.
Even in summer, during dry days, it's easy to pick up stone chips on enamel paint,.
Cleaning bikes is a lot easier & they protect not only you but the bike too, when the rain is around.
If you enjoy muddy, animal shit laden water chaffing your arse crack and being sprayed in your face on wet rides, then sure, don't fit mudguards.
Easy get 2 bikes, I have a winter/rain/gravel-bike with mudguards and a lightweight bike for the good months and climbing.
Mudguards all the way for me, I use my winter bike all year round, I refuse to get my best bike out in summer if its pissing down. There's nothing worse than a wet arse. I use Flinger Deluxe on my Enigma, fantastic quality and look good too.
I have a similar mudguard/rack setup and like yours I think the bike looks very smart with them. Not that I care how it looks because they're superb when the road is soaking since the water being kicked up the bike can be much worse than the actual rain.
I have mudguards on my Winter Bianchi and my Boardman CX which is gravel spec's...the Summer Bianchi....no way..... I'd rather have mudguards and a dry arse....plus clean kit...as you can never get some of the road debris stains out, with some kit costing what it does....worth the mudguards, unless you only ride in the dry summer outdoors & indoor train the other 8 months of the year....
I'll take the slightly ruined look of the bike over a soaking wet arse, muddy face and wet shoes.
Wouldn't be without them. I understand why some might find their aesthetics challenging. However, they are infinitely preferable to looking like one has shat oneself.
A big yes for mudguards. Unless you have a servant to clean your bike
And the same servant could clean one's back passage!
An intriguing idea.
Pages