West Sussex County Council has admitted that it acted illegally in ripping out an emergency bike lane that was showcased in a Department for Transport (DfT) video highlighting examples of how local authorities were rolling out temporary active travel infrastructure in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
The council had been awarded £781,000 in June 2020 under the government’s Emergency Active Travel Fund (EATF) to put seven proposed schemes in place, including the protected cycle lane on Upper Shoreham Road in Shoreham by Sea.
It began work on installing the facility in September of that year, and the cycle lane proved hugely popular, including with parents of children attending the five schools along the route.
But less than two months later the Tory-run council’s cabinet member for highways, Councillor Roger Elkins, said it would be removed, even though the cycle lane had not yet been completed.
The decision was called in by the council’s environment and scrutiny committee, but Councillor Elkins – who it transpired had never even visited the site to see the infrastructure first-hand – stood by it, and work to remove the cycle lane began in January last year.
> “Appalling” – Councillor who made decision to remove popular pop-up cycle lane had never officially seen it for himself
The council’s own monitoring subsequently found that there had been a dramatic increase in speeding on the road after the wands marking the protected cycle lane were removed last year.
> Dramatic increase in speeding after pop-up cycle lane removed
Cycling UK sought a judicial review of the decision in February 2021, with its application initially refused, though permission was granted following appeal, with the case due to be heard this week.
Today, the national cycling charity has announced that it has reached an out-of-court settlement with West Sussex County Council, which admitted that it had acted illegally, and is paying £25,000 towards Cycling UK’s costs in the action, which had been brought via the Cyclists’ Defence Fund.
Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at Cycling UK, said the council’s admission that it had acted illegally should send a message to other local authorities across the country on not scrapping infrastructure before they have had a chance to evaluate its effectiveness.
“In Shoreham, Cycling UK has drawn a line in the sand, showing there are repercussions for councils which ignore government guidance,” he said.
“Hopefully West Sussex County Council’s acceptance they acted illegally will put a stop to short sighted decisions like this happening across other parts of the UK.
“This is a victory for people who want their children to travel to school in safety, for people who don’t have to breathe polluted air, and for everyone who would like healthier, safer streets where we live and work.”
He expressed hope that the new governmental body Active Travel England, launched last Saturday with Chris Boardman named as its interim commissioner, would in future situations take action against local authorities rather than leaving interventions to campaign groups.
“Challenging councils’ which act illegally by ignoring government guidance shouldn’t be the work of charities like Cycling UK,” he said.
“We hope Active Travel England will make sure councils not only promote cycling, but ensure they act lawfully and don’t waste public funds.”
He added: “Cycling UK is truly grateful for all the support we’ve received from the public who have helped to fund our legal battle in Shoreham. We hope they can continue to support us and our ongoing work to make the UK a better place for everyone.”
The charity was represented by solicitor Rowan Smith of law firm Leigh Day, who said: “This is a massive legal, as well as campaigning, victory that will benefit cyclists in West Sussex and across the country.
“Cycling UK has achieved a big win in upholding statutory guidance to embed more climate-friendly travel, which it hopes will contribute to a greener post-pandemic recovery.
“Such great news comes in the wake of the Government setting up Active Travel England, a new body with powers to rank local authorities on the quality of cycling provision in their areas,” he added.
The council has since said that it plans to install high-quality permanent infrastructure on the same route – a promise on which Cycling UK is urging it to follow through.
> Plans to install permanent cycle lane in Shoreham where pop-up lane is being removed
Add new comment
44 comments
Mine arrived yesterday
Mine must be lost in the post...
Looks like "Er - mine arrived yesterday"? Or is that a the first stoat of spring?
They're weasily mistaken for each other
Upper Shoreham? Wear your fox hat!
robes would be very dangerous on bikes
Father Brown doesn't think much of that claim.
You'll be wanting a Workcycles cross-frame pastoorfiets then!
There was an impact report produced by the transport dept of the council who recommended the council take the decision to remove the cycle lane,that they enacted upon, that bit always gets lost in the coverage.
Sometimes councils do agree these settlements simply to stop protracting the legal costs further,certainly if defending the decision costs more than the cycle lane cost to built then it becomes pointless to continue in so much as the council doesnt gain anything by winning anyway.
Superb. I'm glad that as a member I'm suporting this kind of thing, but as Duncan says, it shouldn't be charities that are ensuring that councils abide by the rules.
Staggeringly brilliant result! Thanks CUK for all that hard work, and although you may have got some of the costs back, I'm sure there was so much more dedication, blood and sweat that went into that challenge that can't be reimbursed.
Aren't there several more cases going through the system? If so, surely those councils will cut their losses and reach a settlement, hopefully including reinstating the cycle facilities and re-educating the councillors/officers responsible. Hopefully this will influence other councils that just want to rip out cycle provision if a single driver objects.
Maybe not such great news. The Brighton Argus quotes a council spokesperson: ' ...there is no prospect...of the cycleway scheme... being restored...'
PS avoid the comments. Up to 9 this morning but the only one (of two) I read last night made me fear for humankind.
"as to the danger these steps will entail including stopping of vehicles on major roads because someone is waiting to cross a sidestreet"
"West Sussex CC acts illegally.
Gets sued and decides not to fight the cases as they know they would lose anyway.
Argus commenters - "Bloody Cyclists!'."
C'mon who from here posted the last comment !
Never read The Argus comments, full of absolute knuckle draggers.
Pages