A councillor in Surrey has claimed that a planned bike park near Dorking could attract child molesters.
Mole Valley District Council’s scrutiny meeting discussed last week the council’s plans to outsource management of the BMX track at Ranmore Common, also a popular venue for mountain bikers with extensive trails, to an outside company.
It says that volunteers have helped cut back overgrown scrubland at the site in the past but are no longer able to do so, and the council does not have the budget to carry the work out itself.
The council says a group that runs mountain biking sessions at a local school has approached it with a view to taking on the management of the BMX track and investing in the facility – which will be branded Surrey Bike Park.
Users will pay for access to the facilities, with annual memberships available (Adult £125.00, Public Services (NHS/Forces) £100.00, Youth (Under 18) £90.00, Full Time Student £90.00 and Family 2 Adults 2 Children £305.00).
There will also be day passes for non-members (All day access –standard rate £10.00, After School – standard rate £5.00, All day access (concessionary) £7.50, After school access (concessionary) £3.75).
But Get Surrey reports that Professor Patricia Wiltshire, an independent councillor for Ashtead Common, raised concerns over the welfare of children using the track.
“If you've got adults there, and there will be a lot of adult males, and you have children, we know the problem of checking people,” she said. “They have to be checked because of dangers to children.
“All that sort of thing has to be considered because it could be really quite serious, and you never know it could end up children being molested, goodness knows what,” she continued. “I’m not saying it would but it’s that sort of possibility.
“I don’t think it’s for all ages and genders, I think it will be mostly male and probably quite aggressive males at that,” she added.
The councillor has been accused of making a “sweeping generalisation” by local resident Sarah Meijer, who said: “Saying there is most likely to be aggressive males is a sweeping generalisation,” she said.
“The idea that it would be full of aggressive males on the prowl and the possibility of child molestation was completely unfounded.
“I have always found the cycling community to be extremely friendly, welcoming and supportive.
“I and others were disgusted and offended by the remarks. It is this sort of subtle discrimination that often goes unchecked but needs to be stamped out,” she added.
Some locals, reportedly including members of Mole Valley Cycling Forum, have protested about the BMX track being turned into a paid facility.
But the council’s cabinet member for leisure, Councillor David Draper, said: “People want an adult presence there, they want the ability to repair bikes, they want first aid and they want training, all of which are positive additions.”
Councillor Wiltshire insisted after the meeting that she was reflecting the views of one local resident who had got in touch with her.
“It is unfortunate that my words have been interpreted negatively but I was genuinely trying to save the bike park for existing users to use freely,” she told Get Surrey.
The scrutiny committee voted against the plans, although the ultimate decision rests with the council’s cabinet.
Add new comment
50 comments
A professor of what ffs? Logic???
She's the councillor for the same area where the locals tried to block the alteration of a property SSAFA bought to house families of soldiers undergoing treatment at Headley Court.
The nimbyism and insanity is alive and well....
Professor of thinking up pathetic anti-cycling excuses.
As far as I can see in the article, she is against the park moving to private hands and keeping it free with volunteers helping. There are other councillors totally against it though as the local allotment might hate the "noise" it generates.
Wait til she hears about all the adults at sports centres and schools
In the same way that the internet attracts paedophiles, therefore we must dismantle the internet?
According to Lady Colin Campbell ephebophiles are OK?
Well, someone else to add to my list of "people never to take seriously ever again".
Indeed sir. You might think that anyone bright enough to become a professor would know that a child is much more likely to be molested in the home than anywhere else.
Have you seen the professor's professional background? That appears to be a subject she actually does know about.
Not sure about that - she was an expert witness in the Soham case sure, but her expertise related to specialism in pollen and plant matter, not the mechanics of the crime itself.
She clearly is a highly intelligent, skilled and intelligent individual, (notwithstanding my previous comment) but I'd expect her as a scientist to refrain from making wild and unsupported assertions.
"What do we want?"
"A scientific evidence-based approach!"
"When do we want it?"
"After publication and peer review!"
No she doesn't, she is a forensic ecologist and botanist who has used her expertise on ecology and botany to help the police. She has no professional expertise on child abuse. I've help the police by appearing in line up's, by your assertion that make me a criminologist?
Imagine if some gammony old bloke had raised concerns over Mum's dropping their kids off after school and the danger caused by "women's lack of ability to control a car whilst attempting to park".
you're missing the obious risk of adults and children being in the same place at the same time. Could be molestation or anything.
Maybe all males over the age of 11 should be licenced before being allowed out in public, should wear a hi viz tabbard so they cannot hide in undergrowth and carry a clearly identifiable ID number so that any member of the public can report them if they do anything suspicious.
I mean, if it prevents one child being abused, how can anyone object?
This is the from the same mindset of requiring adult males to wear budgie smugglers in public swimming pools rather than board shorts. And as such, only a matter of time before it becomes law.
And a helmet of course.
The whole point is that no-one gets to see their helmet.
Make that an invisible hi-viz helmet then.
Jesus wept
Pages