Norwegian triathlon heavyweight Kristian Blummenfelt made headlines this week when the former Ironman champ and 2020 Olympic gold medal winner revealed his ambitious plan to win the Tour de France by 2028. Blummenfelt reportedly tested for the highest absolute VO2 max (as opposed to relative VO2 max, which factors in weight), ever recorded in history and is said to be joining UCI WorldTeam Jayco-AlUla to get his two-wheeled career underway.
> "Kristian Blummenfelt is not to be messed with": Tour de France stage winner backs 2020 Olympic triathlon champion's plan to win Tour by 2028 and says he'll "immediately claim his place" in peloton
He had the small matter of defending his Olympic crown yesterday, a task that did not go to plan, Great Britain's Alex Yee pulling off a stunning comeback victory as Blummenfelt finished a disappointing 12th. Afterwards, the soon-to-be pro cyclist was not happy and had a pop at the "amateurish" organisation of the event which was delayed by a day due to concerns about pollution levels in the River Seine.
He told the Discovery TV cameras: "That is not what we have worked for, I'm of course disappointed. I felt I got into a position where I could fight for a medal and victory, but I just didn't quite have the running legs I needed to keep up. I felt I had good control on the bike, and was excited about how my legs would be when I started running, but it was heavy.
"It is the same for everyone, but it is of course amateurish on the part of the organiser..."
We should point out he didn't claim the "amateurish" organising stopped him winning a medal and he was quick to praise GB's Yee and silver medal winner Hayden Wilde for their "aggressive" run.
"I felt ready this morning, that was probably not why," he said. "They go hard from the start. It was certainly expected that they go out quite aggressively in the first two or three kilometres to stretch out the field. It is probably what Alex and Hayden regretted after Tokyo, that they did not run more aggressively."
The "amateurish" aspect of the organisation was how the decision to postpone the races, initially scheduled for Tuesday but delayed until Wednesday due to the level of E. coli bacteria in the Seine where the swimming leg took place, was made and communicated to athletes (who have presumably spent months preparing to peak perfectly for one day). Early yesterday morning the organisers said they'd been given the green light and the races went ahead a day late, no doubt a frustrating exercise for many involved.
Norwegian teammate Vetle Bergsvik Thorn admitted it had "not been optimal", the athletes having to wake up early on both days to check if there was a competition to race. Sports director Arlid Tveiten said it was "unprofessional" to not have a back-up plan for if the Seine was not able to be used, but said with time they'd only remember how cool it was to race through central Paris.
"We think it is a bit unprofessional not to have a reserve arena, but at the same time we have to, so there is nowhere in the world where it is cooler to organise a triathlon. I think that's what we're going to remember when we get a little distance," he said.
Making (admittedly quite valid) complaints about dodgy race organisation after a disappointing result? You'll fit in just fine in pro cycling, Kristian...
Add new comment
35 comments
Tomorrow's headline - "Local racer accused of E.Coli doping". Officials say it's a trickle-down effect from top level sports.
Hard to choose between E.Coli and Carbon Monoxide. Maybe the Olympic committee should start testing swimmers and triathletes for E.Coli rebreathing?
All the other riders were in the same situation and eleven of them finished ahead of him.
Maybe the winner had an unfair advantage and the water companies dumping effluent in the UK's rivers was a cunning plan all along...
To be fair, it does seem pretty amateurish. Basing an entire Olympic event on having cleaned up a historically unclean river with only days to spare with no alternative venue and even a suggestion to run the event with a key component missing, I would say, is quite amateurish.
I understand the desire to run the event as planned, and the Norwegian coach admitted that this will no doubt provide the abiding memories, but given the challenges involved in making the event safe, surely a back up plan would have made sense?
My understanding is it's not at all uncommon (and getting worse) in triathlon for the swim leg to be affected by poor water quality, and mostly it would just end up being cancelled and the race run as a duathlon, it not being practical to relocate or reschedule. The Olympics, being the Olympics, are unusual in having the clout to make alternative arrangements, and paradoxically it's the uncertainty that that's caused that's resulted in most of the complaints.
Pages