‘Sprint on the right side of the road, you pelican!’
It’s been a hard-fought battle over what has felt like an interminably long transfer season – and Lidl-Trek certainly brought their A-game with those novelty t-shirt posts – but the prestigious ‘Social Media Transfer Announcement Post 2023’ award has been snatched at the death by Jayco-AlUla, thanks to this bananas, but surprisingly note-perfect, take on Crocodile Dundee’s final subway scene:
Have you ever seen anything more Australian in your life? Also, Matt White as Sue – perfection…
Anyway, the point of that whole video, aside from brightening up all our mornings, was to announce the signing of Aussie cycling’s very own Mick Dundee, Caleb Ewan, who is returning to the Australian squad he turned pro with nine years ago, on a deal lasting until the end of 2025.
The 29-year-old burst on to the scene with the then-Orica GreenEdge team in the mid-2010s, taking stages at the Giro and Vuelta, before leaving for Belgian squad Lotto in 2019.
After a storming start to his spell at Lotto, winning five Tour de France stages (including one in Paris) and a further four Giro stages, Ewan has endured a frustrating 2023 marked by a series of (sometimes dubious) near misses and a very public falling out with the Lotto Dstny management at the Tour.
> “I’ve seen proof of the Yeti with more pixels”: Caleb Ewan rues another dubious sprint defeat – decided by extremely low-res finish photo
Stéphane Heulot, the team’s CEO, launched a scathing attack against his sprinter in July, questioning Ewan’s “commitment” to the team, comments the Australian’s agent described as “quite disgusting” and “humiliating”.
That breakdown in the relationship between the 29-year-old and the team’s management – Ewan has only raced four times since the Tour, failing to finish on three occasions – opened the door for a return to where it all began, Jayco-AlUla, where he will join old rival Dylan Groenewegen in the Australian outfit’s sprinting ranks.
Ewan has to settle for third on stage three of this year’s Tour, behind Jasper Philipsen and Phil Bauhaus (Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
“For us to have another Australian rider which such calibre joining us, it is very special, and he will provide us with another fantastic option to challenge for sprint finishes,” Brent Copeland, Jayco’s general manager, said in a statement this morning.
Meanwhile, Ewan said: “I’m definitely coming back to the team as a more experienced rider, in the last few years I’ve won the biggest races of my career and I think I’ve developed a lot as a rider and also as a leader. When I joined the team initially, I was only 19 or 20, so I was very young. I learnt a lot from the experienced guys that were already there and used that going forward in my career.
“I have developed as a person and as a rider and I look forward to coming back in more of a leadership role. It will be great to be able to help the younger Australians riders too, to reach their potential and in that way also give back to the team.
“The main thing for me will be getting back to winning ways and I hope to bring a lot of success to the team.”
And what better way to announce the return of Australian cycling’s prodigal son than with a reference to one of its most famous film exports?
I can see the press conferences at the Tour now:
‘So, Caleb, what do you make of the team’s new energy gel supplier?’
‘You can live on it… But it tastes like s***’
‘And what are your chances of winning a stage?’
‘Fair.’
‘What are your chances of winning a stage and the green jersey?’
‘Better than average.’
Alright, alright, I know that’s the sequel, don’t make me get Donk on you…
Add new comment
48 comments
Active travel is vital.
It's funny how people on these developments moan that there are no amenities and young people are bored but so many are against the 15-minute city/town idea.
Two sides of the same coin. Not either/or - both!
Given than cycling is a bit like super efficient walking (same effort, much faster and/or further - plus much easier to carry stuff) AND that it neatly bridges the kind of gaps that you get in a decent public transport system (yeah, we don't all have one...) adding in first class support for cycling (not just "it's ... possible" or "just use the path") is rather important in addition to making places more human-scaled.
Plus - if you provide (properly) for cycling you've provided for wheelchair users, many other mobility vehicles, people with other limits to their mobility, safer travel for children, it's much safer for the partially sighted etc. Active travel shouldn't be "...and those less able can just drive / call taxis / wait in hope for a community bus".
Old faves: who else benefits from decent cycle infra, inclusive cycling.
Re Labour's new towns - given that Starmer essentially endorsed 15 minute neighbourhoods in his speech, there are grounds for optimism
The problem is that if Labour go too hard on these things before the election there is a real problem with the vast number of idiots in this country will forget completely about the last 13 years of shit show under the Tories and vote for them again because they don't want ULEZ and these 15 minutes neighbourhood. Won't something think of the poor suffering motorist. "Its OK, the Tories hear you, we will make sure big bike loses their grip on the country's infrastructure."
.
'Idiot' = 'someone who dares to have a different opinion to my lefty one'.
.
Are you Trendy in disguise?
.
"Idiot" - meaning someone that has been misled by right-wing mainstream media (and maybe a bunch of right-wing conspiracy focussed media too) into not understanding what a "15 minute" neighbourhood entails.
I can understand non-idiots wanting to push the motor agenda due to lack of critical thinking and understanding of counter-intuitive concepts such as induced demands, but why on earth would people want to always have facilities more than a 15 minute journey away? How does that even work - if you live next door to a doctor's surgery, would you then insist on attending one that's further away, or would you go for demolishing all residences within that 15 minute boundary?
Eejit - someone who trawls The Daily Eejit for potted bald opinions ranted out by the swivel-eyed tightrighty ex public school journo-yob then regurgitates them like a gone-off meaty pie as their own. Which particular Ejit-rag is your, er, choice?
I don't think labour need to say anything. Gear Change is still a DfT policy document and Active Travel England is a statutory consultee for these developments.
Active Travel England to be consulted on all large planning applications - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
If Labour want to say anything they just say they will adopt current Tory active travel policies.
I think you're overestimating the number of people who reject ULEZ - most vehicles (more than 9 out of 10) are compliant. Granted in a borough.constituency with a tiny majority it may play a role but generally there is a loud shouty minority in my experience (although I don't doubt that there are inconveniences attached to the scheme).
Unfortunately the Media sensationalism around Anti-ULEZ claims they are a violation of our freedom and must be stopped. They are an enemy to all along side 20mph zones, LTNs and speed limits in general, after all...
New towns could be an opportunity to build something exceptionally good on a large scale. There are plenty engineers, architects and planners who'd love to do it. I hope they'll be given the chance but...
[replying to myself...] there does also need to be a big push on regenerating existing urban cores too, with lots more housing and active travel amenability. Our existing-but-struggling town and city centres are well-suited to being attractive 15 minute neighbourhoods - but there needs to be a concerted effort to repurpose and revitalise them.
Exactly. Before building new, focus on regenerating what is already there in disrepair.
I don't want to offend anyone from Milton Keynes but it's not to my liking!
And - the difficult point - choosing not to drive some trips must be relatively attractive compared to driving them.
Milton Keynes is the example (also Stevenage). The cycling infra certainly isn't perfect at all but would still be considered "good" for much of the UK (even places that have some...) BUT the town was designed to be superbly convenient to drive.
I'm a firm believer that we'd have to get really lucky to have a designer or design team create something better than mediocre... at the risk of creating more Le Corbusier style atrocities.
We've known for at least thousands of years how to build great walkable places, mostly organically with some ground rules, as settlements became villages, then towns, then cities, and buildings got repurposed or replaced as needs changed.
There's the name for the new towns design competition: "come and help us design the UK's next Atro-cities!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iywaBOMvYLI
Pages