Here at road.cc, we’ve always known that riding a bike can lead to great environmental, health, safety, social, and political benefits – and now a group of academics have helpfully confirmed our long-held suspicions.
A new study titled ‘Orientation towards the common good in cities: The role of individual urban mobility behaviour’, undertaken by psychology researchers at the University of Hagen in Germany and published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, examined the relationships between mobility behaviour – in other words, what method of transport you use – and political participation, social participation in organisations, neighbourhood solidarity, and neighbourly helpfulness, four facets of what the authors describe as “orientation towards the common good”.
According to the study, “a pronounced focus on the common good” is considered an essential component of social cohesion and is associated with the wellbeing of residents across diverse communities and multiple social levels.
However, the researchers point out that little has been previously known about the conditions or factors that promote the common good, or how citizens themselves can create it.
Likewise, while cycling is associated with many positive psychological variables, little is known about how it affects the common good.
> Researcher recommends cycling to work to try and match Amazon tribe’s unparalleled heart health
By analysing surveys between 2014 and 2019 of a representative sample of the German population, the researchers found that, in urban environments, “cycling rather than driving was positively associated with orientation towards the common good in all models” and that riding a bike “was the only variable that was a significant positive predictor for all four facets of orientation towards the common good after controlling for possibly confounding variables (home ownership, personal income, education, sex).”
They argue that while the interactions motorists and car passengers have with their direct environments are “significantly reduced”, cyclists on the other hand “directly experience the breadth of social diversity and cultural heterogeneity that make up urban life and cannot escape these impressions due to sensory density”.
This direct experience of the environment around them, the authors say, “leads to a stronger emotional bond between people and their neighbourhood” and therefore can lead to them participating in civic activities and politics.
In other words, riding a bike – and the interactions and emotional connection you have with the people, communities, societies, and things around you while cycling – can make you a more responsible, engaged citizen and neighbour.
> Academic behind ‘cyclists seen as less human’ study: “If you have a safe and normal cycling culture, how could you see people as anything but human?”
The “relative isolation” of driving, meanwhile, can “reinforce individualistic behaviours and cause drivers to neglect collective actions”.
Thus, the authors concluded that mobility behaviour is indeed “associated with the orientation towards the common good”, findings which they say are “significant for policy and planning because the benefits of cycling over driving are more profound and sustainable than previously thought”.
Quick, someone get Rishi on the phone…
Add new comment
69 comments
I agree with much of the sentiment, and when I'm riding I'm usually lit up like a Christmas tree and wearing a hi-vis top and (only because it's a legal requirement here, in truth) cycling helmet. Always have, to try to maximise the odds of getting home in one piece.
However the problem with this style of safety add is that it reinforces in drivers the view that even though they are ( barring freak circumstances) the only ones with a significant probability of causing a KSI statistic, they can only be at most 50% at fault, because the cyclist/pedestrian/wheel chair user/infant in pushchair etc. etc. really should have been paying more attention to the risks posed by the speeding 3.5T dual-cab ute (to use a typical Australian example) while going about their normal, everyday, business.
Clearly the safest solution is for everyone not driving something weighing at least 3.5T to simply stay at home (while hoping a passing airliner doesn't fall on the house).
I don't have a problem with this advert. I don't consider it vicitim blaming, it does alert people to the risks of chosen behaviours. As my father used to say to me, "it is no good having right on your side if you are dead".
And that justifies victim-blaming adverts by law enforcement agencies exactly how?
It's a thinly veiled threat.
Justice & Truth, you say..
So POTUS-45 is dead.
That's an attractive proposition for democrats everywhere.
We seem to have a cabinet of the walking dead ourselves
I think you'll find that they take helicopters or large black limos as, being mostly drunk from both the House of Commons bar and on power-without-principle, they can't manage walking without tripping, falling or grasping at the private parts of passers-by " just to stop myself toppling over, melud".
I thought they only held parties when they'd passed laws against "ordinary" people from seeing each other or dying relatives. I mean what's the point of them partying if they can't laugh at the idiots that voted for them?
"Quick, someone get Rishi on the phone…".
What fer, like? Pishi will only invent more "policies" to see-orf the cyclist whilst promoting car loonery, as the common good is (from Toryspiv perspective) a very bad thing indeed. Folk might begin to notice exploitation, polluting profiteers and spiv-spoilers of every ilk & tittle busy degrading and damaging them and theirs to make more money to salt away tax-free in the foreign places!
Shirly by now The Thatcher Thing's great insight (or was it just a-one o' her queer dreams, due to only 3 hours sleep each night and too many sherries) that there is no such thing as society should have got a firmer hold on the minds of serfs everywhere by now?
I'm surprised that Pishi hasn't yet made a new law reinstating fox hunting, only with cyclists instead of foxes and SUVs instead of hosses. What's that - he already has?!
Pages