Looks like the ‘greatest cyclist of all time’ debate is alive and kicking again.
It all seemed a done deal on Sunday evening when, in the wake of Tadej Pogačar’s devastating, Cannibal-esque 100km attack to win the world road race championships, Eddy Merckx himself appeared to admit defeat, telling L’Équipe “that it’s obvious that he is now above me”.
“Deep down, I already thought as much when I saw what he did on the last Tour de France, but tonight there’s no more doubt about it,” the Belgian – widely regarded as the finest male rider the sport’s seen – told the French newspaper after Pogačar joined him and Stephen Roche as the only men to secure the Giro-Tour-Worlds triple crown in a single season.
> “It’s obvious that he is now above me”: Eddy Merckx casts his vote in the GOAT debate… and he reckons Pogačar has now nipped ahead with “unimaginable” world championships victory
“Obviously, you can never compare eras, but this is an incredible rider. I didn’t attack with 100 kilometres to go in a world championship, but what he has done is unimaginable. It’s something we’ll remember for a very long time.
“He took a lot of risks against [Mathieu] van der Poel and [Remco] Evenepoel, but that didn’t scare him. That’s when you realise that Pogačar is an immense champion. He’s out of the ordinary.”
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
However, after a brief period of reflection on his own cycling legacy, Merckx has suddenly backtracked on his comments, insisting to Spanish site Relevo today that he was simply comparing Pogačar’s exploit in Zurich and his own worlds wins individually, and not their overall careers, before cheekily adding that the UAE Team Emirates rider “has a long way to go to be better than Eddy Merckx”.
When questioned by Relevo on his comments to L’Équipe, Merckx said: “I was referring to what he did at the world championships, on that particular course.
“It was incredible, and I said it like I thought it, but no, beyond that, I don’t think Pogačar is better than Eddy Merckx. He has only won three Tours. He is not better than me yet. He has a long way to go to be better than Eddy Merckx.”
When asked who he thinks, then, is the greatest rider of all time, the five-time Tour de France winner was equally unequivocal.
“I don’t know if it’s right for me to say this, but I think there are few cases of a cyclist who has competed and won so many races from January to December. There was a year in which I did about 190 days of competition. Now, however, they race about 80 days a year, no more.
“Pogačar does a bit of everything, it’s true, but few do what we did, contest the classics, the monuments, and the grand tours by stages. I think there is no comparison.
“He is a very strong cyclist, the best of his generation for sure. But look at what happened last year, Vingegaard was stronger than him at the Tour. And this year, when I think Vingegaard was not yet 100 per cent, he finished second.
“I don’t know, we’ll have to see how the rivalry develops in the coming years. What is clear is that Pogačar has a lot of class.”
Oof. Looks like the GOAT battle – however complicated, contrived, and somewhat meaningless it may be – has recommenced.
(Ed Sykes/SWpix.com)
Of course, as I mentioned on the live blog on Monday, it might be worth pointing out to Merckx – who was quick to note that Pogačar only has three Tours to his name, compared to the Belgian’s five – that at the same age (26), he had only taken two Tour de France victories, and had won the same number of world championship, Tour of Flanders, and Liège-Bastogne-Liège titles as the Slovenian.
To pull at that thread further, Merckx had two Giros to his credit by the time he turned 26, compared to Pogačar’s one, four editions of Milan-Sanremo, which the Slovenian is yet to win (not for want of trying), and two Paris-Roubaixs, which Pogačar is yet to attempt.
However, at that age Merckx was yet to win the Tour of Lombardy (he would go on to win two), while Pogačar is aiming to win his fourth straight Race of the Falling Leaves next Saturday.
Let’s just say, it’ll be worth revisiting this debate in a few years’ time.
Add new comment
68 comments
...and typically imageS of open roads - roads without cars!
(Apart from the one advertised...)
..and no pedestrians other than lustful plebs wishing they were in ~Car~
Yes - a current source of amusement in our household is spotting a car advert with even the slightest hint of traffic.
Maybe before calling out cyclists promoting cars you should do something about the amount of car adverts that generate this site's revenue.
I liked the comment but I'm not sure if road.cc has control of this.
I'm sure they have more control than assumed...cars is obviously where the money's at.
Beats temu and the AI-generated cr*p often sold as ads these days.
Yep, please give me an Aston Martin ad over an AI-generated tasteless t-shirts and "what even is that?" ad from Temu.
Pages