Belgian cyclocross star Toon Aerts, who earlier this week received a two-year doping ban after testing positive for the testosterone-boosting drug Letrozole, has launched a scathing critique of the UCI’s handling of his case, including sending the governing body a “big and heartfelt middle finger”.
The 29-year-old, a leading figure on the cyclocross circuit for much of the past decade, failed an out-of-competition test for Letrozole in January 2022, a week and half before he finished sixth at the cyclocross world championships in Fayeteville, Arkansas, won by Tom Pidcock.
On Friday, after a lengthy investigation, the UCI suspended him for two years, backdated to February 2022 (meaning he will miss the coming ‘cross season), and stripped him of any results obtained between 19 January and 5 February 2022.
> Toon Aerts set to receive two-year ban for positive anti-doping test
The substance Aerts tested positive for, Letrozole, is primarily used to block oestrogen during the treatment of breast cancer, but can be used in a sporting context to help boost the production of testosterone. It is regarded by the UCI as a specified substance, meaning it does not come with an automatic provisional suspension, though Aerts decided to suspend himself while he prepared his defence.
Despite claiming that he was a victim of contamination through a food supplement, the UCI ruled that “after a thorough examination of the case, including several expert reports submitted by the Belgian rider, the Tribunal considered that Toon Aerts had failed to establish how the prohibited substance entered his body.”
In a statement released last night, Aerts lambasted the governing body and its treatment of “flesh-and-blood people”.
“1.5 years I had to wait for this final verdict,” he said. “I may have typed in the word Letrozole on Google 5,000 times during this period… hoping to find the missing piece of the puzzle. But we didn’t find it. Now where on earth did it come from? I still don’t know exactly how this got into my body. But I can’t blame myself. I threw thousands of euros at it, visited several universities, had several reports written by experts… and in the meantime I just kept running, cycling, and teaching.
“Never was I invited by the UCI or given the chance to speak to anyone physically. Everything was via email or registered mail. We were always bound by tight deadlines to reply within a few days, which often included holidays. But on the other hand, we always had to wait weeks, sometimes months, before we could receive anything back.
“Waiting, waiting, waiting… I think they sometimes forget that riders are also just flesh-and-blood people.”
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
He continued: “It has also become clear to me over the past few months that the ‘presumption of innocence’ simply doesn’t exist here. I thought this was a basic right… We tried to explain everything we knew ourselves as transparently as possible and to substantiate it scientifically. This showed with 100 percent certainty that I am not a conscious doping user. You then at least hope for common sense from the people on the other side… But there just isn’t any. The legal framework is sacred.
“I never took doping and ever even considered it. After a year and a half in a legal tug-of-war, now portrayed as a cheater. Along with my entire family and surrounds suddenly labelled losers. It hurts and it doesn’t feel right.
“Well here UCI, a bit and heartfelt middle finger! You could have made us the happiest people on earth… But who is Toon Aerts in the big circus of cycling?”
> “It’s like being wrongly put in prison for murder”: Canyon-SRAM’s Shari Bossuyt protests innocence following doping positive
Aerts concluded by referencing the case of fellow Belgian rider Shari Bossuyt, who also tested positive for Letrozole in June, and who is currently suspended by her Canyon-Sram team as the investigation into her case continues. Like Aerts, the 22-year-old claims she is a victim of contamination.
“I only hope my case rings a bell with everyone,” he wrote, “because I am holding my heart for riders and athletes who may go through exactly the same thing. My heart is bleeding for Shari who is in the same situation.”
Aerts also confirmed he will “definitely be back” racing when his suspension ends on 16 February next year.
Add new comment
43 comments
Fake news! You'll be saying you can get an ambulance there next!
Yes, trains are less common than cars so they should have to stop and press a "beg button" then wait for a green light at every level crossing!
That Dokter Beecham and the badbugger Marples-the-lorry already dun it.
Absolutely, apparantly some of them have been in place since the 1960's, just think how many people have died because emergency vehicles couldn't get to them in the last 60 years!
It's not about ripping out the cul-de-sac, more about knocking down the house on the end, and maybe the one behind it so a multi lane highway can be put in, with plenty of parking, so that it may now be used as a "fast" rat run...
Also:
https://robertweetman.wordpress.com/2020/04/16/where-is-the-best-place-f...
Firstly, a disclaimer I live on a modal street built in the mid 90s. I'd like it to stay that way.
Secondly, I am not suggest that any changes to our street layout should not be reviewed and any potential unforseen negative consequences of changes ignored.
However, nobody should be fooled by Sunak's rhetoric. He's simply kicking the ball down the road presumably until after the next election. He's failed to establish a review panel or to detail the criteria for which the success or failure of such schemes can be established. I am convinced that any such review will identify the benefits of LTNs to polution, health, climate etc etc which will outweigh the small inconveniance to a minority of drivers. So what happens then? Wellidf Sunak does get re-elected, then like many similar reviews before it the Tories will simply find another way to stall any meaningful progress. All of this while our planet continues to burn.
The simple fact that experts may have already come to some conclusions on the benefits of many LTNs and that more empirical evidence will only underline this will only outrage the climate change denyers.
The Alt Right playbook:
*Evidence that its happening is presented
"Its not happening"
*More compelling evidence that it is happening is presented
"Its not happening"
*Irrefutable proof that it is happening is presented
"Its not happening"
*Evidence so clear that it is happening is presented that to deny it would mark you as a lunatic
"Ok, its happening but there is nothing we can do about it"
*Evidence that we can do something about it is presented
"Well now its too late to do something about it and its somehow someone else's fault"
Real life example, here in south west Scotland multiple windfarm planning applications were objected to on the basis that it would destroy tourism in the area as they are a "blot on the landscape" These objections were dismissed continually until recently when the message became " the landscape has already been ruined with windfarns so one more won't matter.
Before anyone says "but windfarms are green" yes they are to an extent but they're not what we need, we need nuclear and governments of all colours have been failing us on this for decades!
Well the ol' onshore wind was for a long time a good way to grab subsidies... Nuclear is pretty hard to get "done" by governments, plants are always "controversial" and they take ages to get going. They're also getting much more expensive.
Currently we're kind of on "predict and provide" with energy. What would be to our advantage - or our descendents' advantage would be to use much less, more efficiently. (If only we could avoid trying to keep up with the Joneses - probably humanly impossible!) And - given the UK has hills, lots of coast and (currently) has a temperate climate - get some more of the more dependable renewables and some storage (offshore wind, pumped hydro).
We (as in the government - devolved or national) should have invested far more in to getting Pelamis to work efficiently.
But ... its hard for a politician to point at a half submerged tube that's quietly going its thing in the waves, than at a 60m, gleaming white tower with 30m long spinning blades.
Far better to point at the blot on the landscape and say "behold, what I have done, I've made a better world for everyone" ... wins more votes.
And there is great irony in standing with your back to Torness Nuclear Power Station (generates enough for about 5m homes) and looking at a wind farm ...
Don't worry, nothing will actually happen before the next GE so unless the british people are daft enough to elect another tory government you're safe...on second thoughts worry, worry a lot!
Pages