Tower Hamlets Council’s decision last month to remove most of the borough’s low traffic neighbourhood schemes, despite a series of consultations showing that residents were in favour of retaining the traffic-calming measures, has been criticised by a group of local headteachers, who have penned an open letter to mayor Lutfur Rahman urging the notoriously anti-active travel politician to reverse the decision, which they branded “an attack on thousands of children’s futures”.
Last month, we reported that Tower Hamlets Council voted to scrap the walking and cycling initiatives introduced by the previous Labour administration in 2021 in Columbia Road, Arnold Circus, and Old Bethnal Green.
A similar Liveable Streets scheme on Canrobert Street, however, was retained, while a bus gate restriction in Wapping was kept due to “exceptional” support in a consultation last year.
“As headteachers of Tower Hamlets schools, we have a duty of care to all the young people in the borough and we are shocked and dismayed by the way that Mayor Rahman’s decision on 20 September deprioritised the health and safety of students in Bethnal Green,” the letter, addressed to councillor Mushtak Ahmed and signed by 86 primary and secondary school headteachers, said.
This isn’t the first time, meanwhile, that Rahman’s pro-car platform – since his re-election last year, the Aspire Party leader has rolled back a series of initiatives aimed at reducing motor vehicle traffic and promoting active travel, which he claims have increased congestion and contributed to more CO2 emissions in the area – has been opposed by local schools.
Last October, children, teachers, and parents installed their own Les Misérables-style barricade outside a school in Bow in protest at the council’s decision to put an end to School Streets initiatives in the borough, designed to restrict the use of motor vehicles outside schools at drop-off and pick-up times – a campaign that eventually saw Rahman reverse his decision.
> Children take to the barricades to save School Street
And in their open letter to the mayor, they accused the council of ignoring the views of local schools when it came to ripping out the borough’s “popular and successful” Liveable Streets measures, a decision they say would bring the borough “back to square one”.
The letter said: “Five of the most affected schools (Oaklands, Lawdale, Elizabeth Selby, Virginia, Columbia) wrote jointly to the mayor on 30 January 2023. In the letter they outlined why they supported the current street layouts in Bethnal Green, their concerns about the proposals to reintroduce thousands of extra cars per day in front of their school gates, and their belief that there are ways to improve the current layouts, for example by introducing more controlled crossings.
“The letter did not receive a response, neither the mayor nor any member of his cabinet went to speak to the schools, and it was not included in the consultation reports appended to the officer report for the 20 September decision. This is an unacceptable omission in the decision-making process.
“Mayor Rahman promotes the interests of Tower Hamlets’ young people through his free school meals policy for secondary schools and in his decision to retain the 33 ‘school streets’ across the borough.
“However, his decision to remove the current street layouts in Bethnal Green, and his failure to take any steps to reduce vehicle journeys in the borough, are an attack on thousands of children’s futures.”
> “Extreme, undemocratic, and dangerous”: Council scraps majority of low traffic neighbourhoods – despite “overwhelming” public support for cycling and walking schemes
The headteachers noted that, according to the council’s public health team, only 23 percent of children and young people in Tower Hamlets are physically active and that all schools in the area have council-approved School Travel Plans, which aim to encourage cycling and walking to school, and reducing car use.
“So, infrastructure which encourages walking and cycling to school is a powerful tool for the council to use, yet the mayor has decided to spend millions of pounds removing the most successful active travel infrastructure in the borough,” the letter said.
The council’s own equalities impact assessment, the teachers pointed out, also flagged during the decision-making process that scrapping LTNs would have a particularly negative effect on young people, due to the “increase in road danger, pollution, and discouragement for walking and cycling”.
> Police urge against scrapping low traffic neighbourhood, saying it reduces crime
The letter concluded: “While the immediate effects of this decision will be felt most significantly by schools within the low traffic neighbourhood in Bethnal Green, the impact will be felt across the borough.
“Children and young people will see that their daily safety and their long-term health is less important to the powers that be than the interests of people passing their schools in motor vehicles.
“More children will spend more days doing short journeys in cars, undermining their fitness, and increasing their risk of obesity. And they will all have friends in neighbouring boroughs who are much happier walking and cycling to school, where the councils have ongoing programmes to install and improve active travel infrastructure.
“How is it rational to feed and teach our children well, mandate that schools should encourage walking and cycling to school, and then remove the infrastructure which makes it safe and easy for young people to travel in a healthy way every day?”
Add new comment
35 comments
Bit of a chicken-and-egg situation, I think: there is a lack of track cycling coverage in the mainstream media, because I suspect the mainstream viewing population isn't aware of it / isn't familiar with it; so the mainstream media could cover it so as to inform people that it even exists, but they won't because they don't think the mainstream population is interested; but if they did cover it, the mainstresam population might be interested; etc etc etc etc etc....
It's not a lot different to MTB racing; receives scant coverage - even from the cycle racing media - and we have the World/Olympic XCO champion, plus the Downhill World Champion - and U23 XCO World champion......
Too many of the cycle racing journalists are just road racing focussed; they wouldn't know a MTB if it ran over them.
For those who are unaware of Lutfur Rahman, see his wikipedia page. The Controversies section is quite extensive. Private Eye's Rotten Boroughs column has also been quite educational on the subject over the years. I'm sure he does a lot of good as well.
no doubt... knighthood for services to democracy in the post
Trebles all round.
Pages