This one’s not strictly a cycling story, but it is funny.
According to a press release sent to us today by Warwickshire Police (so you know it’s going to be good), a motorist was handed six points on his licence, along with fines and charges amounting to over £1000, earlier this month after failing to provide information about the identity of the driver in relation to a speeding offence.
After the owner’s vehicle was caught at 58mph in a 50mph zone last December, the 28-year-old was sent a Notice of Intended Prosecution requiring him to confirm who was behind the wheel.
But instead of ‘fessing up, the historically-minded motorist decided to send several documents quoting medieval laws and customs – including Clause 39 of the Magna Carta, which guarantees freedom from arbitrary punishment without due process – and, bizarrely, demands for millions of pounds.
Not sure what Pope Innocent III would make of that ‘defence’, mind you…
“Let me be clear, all drivers on UK roads are subject to the statutory requirements of the Road Traffic Act, Warwickshire Police’s Dave Valente said in a statement. “This includes driving licences, vehicles being MOT’d, insured and taxed. It also means complying with the speed limit, and the consequences of failing to do so.
“Drivers who respond with extensive demands based on ancient medieval customs, will not evade prosecution.”
Good to know.
However, Valente also noted that this reliance from law-breaking drivers on medieval rights and charters is, oddly, on the increase in the UK.
“Unfortunately this is not a one off case,” he said. “We have noticed an increase in those who quote this type of material, to avoid the consequence of a speeding offence.
“This driver found out the hard way, trying to avoid a speeding prosecution could cost them a lot more than responding in accordance with the Road Traffic Act.”
Add new comment
39 comments
He did some good bits at Glastonbury.
Unexpectedly engaging and charming BBC series.
Brighton's new Labour council strikes again as another active travel project, slated to start this year, is paused: https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2023/06/26/final-phase-of-valley-gar...
So they've painted in that cycle lane at the Foot of the Walk just as a navigation aid so cyclists can work out how to go through a gap in the kerb? It doesn't grant any sort of priority at all?? Alrighty then...
It looks like the answer of "how to survive" is to completely ignore the cycling infrastructure - note the other cyclist in Dave McCraw's video also not using it.
They're ignoring the useless paint and using the useful built cycle infrastructure, so not quite a John Forrester
It's a really poor design that creates needless conflict but, in principle, it's very simple - anything turning left has to ensure the cycle lane is clear: Rule H3, 211.
I don't disagree in principle but I'm not going to put my life on the line every time I use it it hoping the driver behind me knows and understands that rule.
It's also interesting to see that the bus in the video is one of the new double axle types which proved unsuitable and too large for some of the initial routes they were deployed on due to their size and turning circle.
Edinburgh Clowncil, you couldn't make some of it up.
Oh, I agree. In principle it should work fine because 'the rules', but in practice it absolutely needs to be redesigned before someone dies.
Since when does everyone follow the HC? The ones that are backed up by criminal law get ignored on a daily basis by numerous drivers(including speeding, red light running, mobile phone use and driving whilst under influence of drugs/alcohol, no insurance/MOT/tax). What makes you think that the more advisory rules (which are primarily written as etiquette to settle civil disputes) will get better treatment?
Pages