Oh the duality of cycling. Two riders enjoying a ride in the most beautiful weather on a sunny hill in Spain, while another drudges his way through the snow with a bike.
With the cyclocross season now underway, it's time for the roadies to let loose, but if you've chosen the double life of a cross and a road cyclist, there ain't no rest for the wicked.
The men's road racing world champion Mathieu van der Poel and the men's time trial champion Remco Evenepoel were filmed cycling together in Calp, a quaint little town on Spain's Mediterranean coast, with clear blue skies and a shining sun overhead.
Evenepoel also posted the ride on his Strava, on which he was also accompanied by another Alpecin rider Siebe Roesems, with the activity titled 'FC Alpecin'.
And then on the other hand, there's Wout van Aert, fresh off the back of winning Tour of Britain and a road season which seemed to dazzle and burn too brightly at the start, only for it to flicker in the middle and end with not as many victories and goals as the Belgian rider might have wanted to achieve.
Wout van Aert, Dublin UCI Cyclocross World Cup 2022 (Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
It's been almost 10 months that Van Aert has raced in cyclocross, and now the 29-year-old rider from Herentals, Flanders, was back in his home region to amp up his CX training. With temperatures below the freezing point, he completed a 146km ride yesterday, and another 68km on Tuesday, with the latter titled 'Annual wake-up call'.
Belgian rider Eli Iserbyt chipping in with a cheeky comment on Strava: "Please don't wake up too much."
And to add more to the misery, Van Aert also did a 10km run in wet snow yesterday, also part of training regiment for cylocross. Cycling, what a brutal sport.
Add new comment
80 comments
We have an area that gives options. The one is safer and slower and the other is faster and as demostrated in the video possibly dangerous. Anyone may chose his route. I would definitely choose safe and slow, some here would prefer speed. As many times posted here before, I cycle in order to feel safe given the expected real conditions, not the ones I would expect other drivers to make if they fully obliged to the law as if they were robots.
I will not necessary agree with some laws in other countries that oblige you to cycle in cycle lane if it exists. But in any case when there is dedicated cycle infra I try to use it. Not only because in the vast majority is safer than having to share the road with a 40 ton truck, but because when you use them, it is the best advertisement for people still hesitant to cycle. More cyclists on the road, greater chances to have better cycling infra in the future.
Have a nice weekend guys
I live outside of London where what passes for cycle infrastructure is in most cases a shared use sign on the pavement. I would love to have infrastructure like this on my doorstep, and enjoy using it when I have the energy to take the brompton with me to avoid the tube going from central to West London.
Have a great one.
I responded to your questioning the cyclist using the road - you did specifically do that, so why are you fabricating some personal attack on me and "Rendy"?
I have no problem with you having a different viewpoint, but if it's a victim blaming one, then I'll try to clarify why you want the cyclist to modify their behaviour, but not the motorist that's causing the issue.
Why do you think this is being blown out of proportion? I at no point accused you of victim blaming, but pointed out that your comment was (there is a difference between accusing someone of "being" something vs pointing out that a comment has that property). I'm wondering if you're projecting somewhat.
I am not projecting at all, just as I never "decried" the cyclists for using the road. All I did was point out that the cycle lane that cyclisto referenced at the start, was at that point in use/usable.
Well, it certainly came across that way to me.
Decry: To express disapproval of (a person); denounce: synonym: criticize.
So, interpreting your question as a simple, non-judgemental question, I would answer that the cyclist wants to use the straight-forward quicker route.
You've completely ignored what I've said, the cycle path stops there and you would have to cross the road and cycle in the traffic lane that the cyclist is using anyway. They have simply switched to the road sensibly in advance so they don't have to try and cross two lanes of traffic in order to carry on going forward.
Do you mean the one on the other side of the road? Just a case of crossing two lanes of traffic to get there, probably tangle with pedestrians or get stopped at every side street and then cross back over two lanes of traffic when it suddenly stops and you want to use the road again.
Alternatively, drivers could just wait until they could make a safe overtake of the bus - maybe 5 seconds or so?
Sarcasm on
But surely the vehicles were "established"
sarcasm off
Please don't share AI "Art". It is trained by stealing from human artists. Every AI art piece is by definition stolen intellectual property from a all human artists who have a hard enough life as it is.
Today its: "Har har it put fingers on a shoe har har" but we are a very small number of years away from "Why would I employ a creative human to do that job when an AI can do it instead for free?"
I don't want to live in a world where human creativity is eradicated, do you?
Agree. I don't take photographs, because it's putting landscape and portrait painters out of a job and eradicating human creativity.
People have wanted art, and to employ good artists, despite the technological changes through pretty much the whole of human history. I don't see that changing.
If someone's art can be replaced, without any loss of meaning, by AI then it probably wasn't a good use of the artist's time or skills. I'm pretty sure you could build a robot that could pedal a self-steering bike at 100kph, but people will still want to watch the Tour de France.
That doesn't really change the fact that they are using artwork without permission or payment, potentially for commercial purposes.
Unless an artist is blind then so have they!
Iirc one of the newer releases of either Disco Diffusion or Stable Diffusion is trained on unstolen art.
Can't say I really know anything about it personally but a friend of mine likes to waffle about that stuff.
Most commercial art is in large part created out of the works and ideas of other artists and quite a bit of fine art too. Certain types of work may be automated, but moan about it to a highly skilled type compositor of forty years ago, paying opportunities for human creativity will remain and probably expand.
Fatal Crashes
The attached report refines data previously published by
and is a very significant step forward in understanding the causes of fatal crashes. By using the last, rather than an early assessment point, we draw benefit from an extensive investigation using a whole range of expertise, and in doing so provide a much more precise assessment of the contributory factors. We recognise that more informed fatal crash data will help all stakeholders - including policing - respond to and target the causes, and by doing so help to save life. It will also provide a more informed picture for crash victims and the wider public. The data has found a notable rise in speed and impairment through drink or drugs as contributory factors, and therefore we now know that these offence types are much more likely to result in fatalities. This reinforces our strategy of targeting drivers who commit these offences. On average 5 people die every day in the UK in road crashes, and somebody is killed or seriously injured every 23 minutes. So many people lives needlessly cut short or changed, and so many bereaved families left with lifelong devastation. This has to change and more informed data can help influence the urgent action needed.
From Andy Cox
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/contributory-factors-in-fatal-c...
Thanks - an excellent link.
Some limits to the data of course (it's the police, so police have to have attended AND made a note of something) but it's high proportion of the total available.
Probably not surprising to everyone but the main ones associated with deaths:
Speed - exceeding the speed limit or travelling too fast for conditions
Drink or drugs - driver or rider impaired by alcohol / driver or rider impaired by drugs
Distraction - driver using mobile phone
(Plus not wearing seatbelts)
Remind me why phone use and speeding aren't "real" crimes again?
I love that, for Cycling in Kilkenny, that was enough traffic to warrant posting a video of! When I think of the hundreds of stationary cars I have passed in my commuting...
Despite the fact that it could have been highly entertaining, probably the right call not to include pave sections in the opening stage of the Tour. Opening stages are always incredibly chaotic and nervous anyway, throw in a rainstorm and muddy cobbles and it could have been absolute carnage; imagine the criticism the organisers would get if two or three GC contenders went out on the opening day with broken collarbones or worse. In eschewing the chance to race on the cobbles they are thinking about the health and spectacle of the race as a whole as opposed to a one-off sensation at the start. For those of us who love Paris-Roubaix, well, we've got Paris-Roubaix! Without wanting to sound too much of the old curmudgeon that I am, I hope this starts a trend to stop including quite so many "novelty" stages in GTs, they are exciting enough as it is without the need to chuck in gravel or cobbles, in my opinion.
Quite apart from the cobbles thing, three stages in the Pas de Calais looks ideal for popping over w bike to spectate and ride and bring back wine.
To me the Flanders bicycle road speed limit sounds, on balance, to be a benefit for people using cycles. It will help control dozy drivers in motor vehicles, which is the problem.
Provided it is enforced.
The only issue is imo if it turns out to be an entering wedge.
Yup, 30 km/h is a bit over 18 MPH, I have no trouble staying under that in town without needing a speedometer, unless there's a long descent.
CyclingMikey's brilliant explanation of the difference between cyclists filtering and drivers passing too closely:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikWFQquoZto
I prefer this one: https://twitter.com/theJeremyVine/status/1492768026965463040
'Hmm... this page doesn’t exist. Try searching for something else.'
Sorry, when you paste a link road.cc sometimes includes a trailing space in the hyperlink. Try this.
Yep, thats a good one too.
Cue bicycle nunberplates in Flanders!
Yeah, there's no way to enforce it for cyclists, but those on mopeds etc. will need to watch out which is great.
Reading the article I think the title is misleading. I think the limit is aimed at motor traffic using the bicycle streets not the cyclists.
Yep, that's what I think. You can't send a fine through the post for speeding if you can't identify the rider.
Pages