A cyclist from Winchester has criticised Hampshire County Council after a street sweeper fire caused a diesel spill on Upper High Street, resulting in dangerous road conditions that led to his accident. Jonathan Edgoose, 62, who shattered his hip in the crash, has accused the council of negligence, claiming that the lack of proper action left cyclists vulnerable.
On 11 December, a street sweeper caught fire near the council offices on Upper High Street, spilling a significant amount of diesel across the road. The fire triggered evacuations and road closures, but the council's response to the diesel spill has been heavily criticised. While the council made some cleaning attempts, the road remained slippery for days, with no warning signs or closures to protect cyclists and pedestrians.
The first victim of the diesel spill was Nick Wray, who injured his wrist after coming off his bike on the street and said that the council had failed to clean the street or put up any signs warning cyclists, pedestrians and other road users about the slippery roads.
Now, The Hampshire Chronicle has reported that Mr Edgoose, an experienced cyclist, was also injured when he fell from his bike on 14 December due to the slippery road surface. “I’ve been cycling for years, and this road is already tricky enough without something like this,” Edgoose said. “I’ve had five days of agony, and I’m on all sorts of morphine. The council should have done something sooner. It was a totally avoidable accident.”
The crash resulted in a shattered hip for Edgoose, who has since undergone hip replacement surgery. His recovery will take several months, and he says the injury has severely impacted his life, including cancelling a planned cycling trip to Spain in January.
> “To leave a road in that sort of state is really quite serious”: Cyclist slips and injures wrist as council leaves roads covered with diesel for days after street sweeper fire
“It’s ruined my Christmas. I was looking forward to my trip, but now I can’t even walk properly, let alone cycle. The doctors have told me that my hip will never be the same again,” he explained.
Edgoose believes the council failed to act in a timely manner, despite the fact that the diesel spill was reported as a significant hazard. “The oil was on the road for days before I had my accident. The council knew about it, and yet they waited far too long to close the road and clean it properly. It’s incompetent. If it was dangerous, they should have shut the road down straight away,” he said. “It’s not just about cyclists – what about pedestrians? I know at least four other cyclists who have fallen there. When you're on two wheels, you hit the ground hard.”
His frustration was echoed by Wray as well, who had earlier said: “It’s just unbelievable that nothing was done sooner. The fire happened on December 11, and the council didn’t even close the road or put up warning signs. It’s such a serious issue. I’m bruised and battered, and my bike was damaged too. I just don’t understand how this was allowed to go on for so long.”
Hampshire County Council responded by apologising for the inconvenience and disruption caused by the diesel spill. In a statement posted on social media, the council acknowledged the hazardous conditions on Upper High Street: “Our highways service has been working on-site at Upper High Street in Winchester to clear a large diesel spillage caused by a vehicle fire on Wednesday, 11 December. We have undertaken several deep cleaning treatments to remove the fuel residue.
“However, this has penetrated the surface of the road and pavement, creating slippery conditions for road users and pedestrians. Following further site assessments this morning, we have closed a short section of the High Street between the roundabout at Sussex Street and its junction with Tower Street to undertake further specialist cleaning.”
The council also apologised for the disruption, particularly during the busy Christmas period, but stated that the closures were necessary to ensure public safety. “We apologise for the disruption this will cause in Winchester city centre at this busy time of year, but it is essential to ensure the road and pavement can continue to be used safely,” the statement concluded.
Add new comment
38 comments
You've clearly never had to accelerate out of the way from a falling chimney or similar predicament
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jL29m3lW-k
Speed limits vary quite largely depending on the road type or location, so cars will always have to have the ability to exceed the lowest one in order to reach the fastest one.
We had an incident with a DPD van, we arrived at a cross roads to turn left (we are behind the give way line with right of way to traffic coming from Left/Right). As we start to turn right a DPD van arrives from the opposite direction turning left.
Some of the group behind me are a little slow in turning right so the DPD van turns in front of them, driver is ranting and gesticulating. He promptly stops immediatly (less than 20 meters) after turning blocking the road to deliver to a house on the corner.
The road he turned out of was a dead end with little traffic.
A couple of years ago, I hired a fancy carbon bike whilst in Spain. Did 93 miles in three days (twas a family holiday, so had to cap my time riding) not once did I get an even nearly close pass! My rides in the UK, are generally around 10 miles, that way I have more oportunity to get on the bike. VERY rarely do I get home without having a rant about "moronic idiots" in cars, vans and lorries trying to kill me. Often half a dozen in one ride. How do they get to know that Im out so quickly???
Why do you give these morons oxygen?
Meanwhile, in Glasgow another cyclist struck down by a driverless car
https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/24825235.cyclist-critical-condition-...
Sadly not really morons in the political sense. Lots of people (not just desperate Conservatives or Farage-style demagogues and "disruptors") have spotted that throwing out a bit of "but cyclists" is useful distraction. And some are eager to fill a small but significant market for prejudice-driven "banter" (hate).
Political criticism is usually easier and safer than construction. Politicians and other salespeople work on the very powerful human fears of loss and our sense of injustice. If challenged to make a positive statement they can say they'll facilitate the flow: "you have to drive - so we will make that cheaper and easier!"
Driving is synonymous with transport and we are very priveledged compared to almost everywhere else in this regard. However we're limited by the problems and inefficiencies of mass motoring, which will likely increase in future. But any change from that will result in disruption and indeed must involve driving being less convenient in relation to other transport modes.
"Has it got easier and cheaper to drive (travel)?" or "will (a given change) make your drive (journey) harder?" will do.
They should get the story correct ---- Car strikes bicycle (no humans involved)
None apart from the human in a critical condition. Aye no humans FFS
Pages