A judicial review into London mayor Sadiq Khan’s plans to expand the city’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) at the end of August gets under way today at the High Court, following an appeal by five Conservative-led councils.
According to the Labour mayor’s plans, the ULEZ – inside which motorists will be charged £12.50 a day for driving non-compliant, high-polluting cars – will be extended to outer London from 29 August, a decision described by Khan as “not easy but necessary to reduce the capital's toxic air pollution”.
As part of the expansion, a £110m scrappage scheme will also be introduced, which aims to provide low-income Londoners with grants of up to £2,000 to replace their high-polluting vehicles.
> Boris Johnson blasts “unnecessary” ULEZ expansion as “mad lefty tax” designed to “rake in money from hard-pressed motorists”
However, since the start of 2023, Khan has faced increasing pressure from local authorities to reconsider the expansion. Eleven of the 19 outer London councils initially expressed their apprehension towards the scheme over issues such as the seven-month timescale of implementation (which they believe does not give residents enough time to switch vehicles), the scrappage policy, and poor public transport links.
But in the end, it was the Conservative-controlled Bexley, Bromley, Croydon, Harrow, and Hillingdon councils who launched legal action over the expanded ULEZ, after publicly declaring that they would “do everything in our power to stop it from going ahead”.
The councils argued that there were five grounds for a judicial review, though in April the High Court ruled there was only sufficient evidence for three of them.
These include the belief that the expansion is too big and should thus be treated as a new scheme, that the consultation was flawed, and that it did not consider the potential for those bordering the zone to take advantage of the scrappage scheme.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Paul Osborn, the Conservative leader of Harrow Council, said the local authority believed the ULEZ expansion would have a “devastating impact on the poorest motorists in Harrow”.
“People who do low paid jobs in antisocial hours, they don’t have public transport alternatives,” he said. “They’re being asked to pay £12.50 every day to go to work and if they work over midnight, they’ll be asked to pay £25 because they have to pay it for the next day as well.”
However, Hirra Khan Adeogun, head of Car Free Cities at climate change charity Possible, told the programme that the legal action was a distraction from the main issues concerning pollution and the environment.
“It’s such a shame to see these local authorities wasting time and taxpayers’ money trying to prolong the negative impacts of air pollution and climate crisis,” she said.
“It’s absolutely essential that people in outer London get cleaner air and be part of a greener London and that includes poorer Londoners who are most at risk when it comes to toxic air.”
Meanwhile, Khan told Reuters: “The independent assessment confirms that ULEZ works and the expansion will lead to five million more Londoners breathing cleaner air.
“You’re not going to please 100 percent of people all the time. No politician in history has managed to do so.”
Earlier this year, Khan also argued that the opposition to the scheme was simply a political strategy by Tory councils who he says are “in the pocket of vested interests”.
The BBC was also told in January that the councils keen to instigate a judicial review accept that it would be unlikely to succeed, but that it would nevertheless act as a “delay tactic” to “tangle the mayor up in court and push a decision on the matter closer to the 2024 London mayoral election”.
Add new comment
78 comments
The chinese? You know the largest population in the entire world.
are there many Chinese people who don't have access to google who frequent Road.cc ?
At least 9000
"Pedant on"
India has now just edged China out with 1,428,758,094 sorry 095 nah 096 against 1,425,667,828. India now 131 oops 142
"Pedant off"
I demand a re-count!
Now 1,428,758,495 🤣
<face/palm>
Does it actually matter?
You were alluding to last year's sh!tstorm about P&O and I put a relevant news quote about it up.
I was supporting your comment: why are you making such a big deal about it?
Why are you so quick to bite? 🎣
Where do you look for that?
I put "DuckDuckGo" into my search bar and that loads a page that I can search for Google on.
Also found a website that makes it easy to find: https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=google
You can have DDG or Bing or whatever you want to use but you still have google. It doesn't cease to exist for you
I don't know - I stopped using AltaVista many years ago and it ceased to exist. Coincidence?
Um. Yes. Yes it is. I ceased to use Bing but it's still about. Maybe you were the only Altavista user in the world and they just didn't want to tell you.
I knew it!
Perhaps everyone else was tempted elsewhere? I remember having an embarrassing moment many years ago when I was asked to give a lesson in the internet to a friend's dad. Entered alta-vista by accident - which took us somewhere entirely unexpected.
Thinking about it now though perhaps that wasn't such a faux-pas after all?
I used to use Copernic as then it searched the top 10 search engines so I could spread my business around.
Nobody but me should have google at the moment, I downloaded it to my PC last week and Alphabet still haven't paid the ransom so I'm keeping it!
No one really wants Bing.
Pages