Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Driver who told cyclist “I’m going to kill you” before ramming him with car jailed

Judge told Bradley Harris he had carried out an “appalling piece of deliberate dangerous driving” when he knocked Michael Edge off his bike

A driver ​who told a cyclist “I’m going to kill you” before ramming him with his car has been jailed for 10 months after being found guilty of dangerous driving.

Bradley Harris of Northop, Flintshire, was also banned from driving for 20 months and will have to pass an extended retest to regain his licence, reports the Daily Post.

Mold Crown Court heard that Harris, aged 27, was driving his Audi A3 on Northop High Street at around 8am on 21 April last year, with cyclist Michael Edge riding in the opposite direction.

Phil Clemo, prosecuting, said that Mr Edge thought that Harris, who was driving an Audi A3, would slow down so they could get past each other, but when he didn’t, the cyclist moved into a layby to enable the driver to pass him.

According to Mr Clemo, Harris “felt deeply affronted” at the cyclist moving to one side.

CCTV images showed the driver reversing down the High Street “at speed” then making a three-point turn and driving after Mr Edge.

Harris then shouted at the cyclist: “I'm going to knock you off. I'm going to kill you,” then deliberately swerved at him, with the cyclist sustaining injured ankles among other injuries.

When interviewed by police, however, Harris tried to claim that it was the cyclist who had instigated the confrontation, and denied that he had caused his injuries, insisting the exchange had been purely verbal.

In mitigation, Robin Boag said that Harris had experienced “a few moments’ loss of control” due to stress and that he took that out on the cyclist.

He added that his client was well aware of the potential effects of dangerous driving, having lost his father in a road traffic collision when he was a child.

Judge Niclas Parry, however, described what Harris had done as an “appalling piece of deliberate dangerous driving” in which he used his vehicle “as a weapon,” adding that the only appropriate punishment was imprisonment.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

37 comments

Avatar
TriTaxMan replied to BalladOfStruth | 2 years ago
4 likes

BalladOfStruth wrote:

I can only assume the cyclist gestured/said something (which is not unreasonable when confronded with bad driving) and it set the guy off. I've had a guy jump out of his car before now, fists swinging, when I had the audacity to shake my head after he cut me up on a roundabout. There are some utter knobs out there.

It's just that the article says that it was the cyclist moving over that caused the offence. I'm sure there's more to this.

See I read the article on the Daily Post the opposite way.  This sentence "Mr Edge "didn't think a lot" about moving into a layby to make space before carrying on with his journey, with the prosecution saying that he "experienced this a lot" as a regular cyclist." in particular

The way I read that sentence was that there was a layby for the cyclist to use but because they were an experienced rider they felt comfortable continuing on the road without diving out of the way of the motorist.  Which IMHO is a more likely situation which would trigger the driver.

Having looked at google maps it sounds like the rider would likely be passing a row of parked cars on their side of the road, with the Audi driver not waiting until the rider finished passing the parked cars.... then the Audi driver taking objection to the cyclist not using a gap in the parked cars to let him past.  (p.s. that's all speculation on my part and is no way suggesting that the cyclist did anything wrong)

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to TriTaxMan | 2 years ago
2 likes

I am partial to a bit of speculation and I suspect that the 'it happens a lot' is a reference to cars failing to give way at parked cars on their side of the road and driving straight at an oncoming cyclist.

I would think this is the likely view the cyclist had and they pulled into the layby outside the shop because the car didn't wait behind the parked cars on their side.

If it had been me, I may have over-exaggerated a swerve into the layby to make a point. That might rile a certain type of motorist, as they could think I had not appreciated the tiny gap they had planned to give me.

Avatar
nosferatu1001 replied to BalladOfStruth | 2 years ago
6 likes

Me yellin oi at a nob parked in the bus stop / cycle lane (yeah, shitty infra) was eniugh to get chased down, forced off the road, punched kicked by the pair of them then a cricket bat to the bike wheel for good measure. 
 

definite nobs. 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to nosferatu1001 | 2 years ago
13 likes

nosferatu1001 wrote:

I didn't understand that reasoning either - maybe he somehow felt reduced because the cyclist chose to stop? 

I have noticed in recent years a tendency in a very small minority of motorists to be affronted if a cyclist offers them courtesy, e.g. waving them out of a junction or stopping to allow them to come down a single lane between parked cars first, most people say thank you but from the odd one you get a frown or even occasionally the finger. I think it must be something to do with their thinking that in ceding to them you are somehow claiming an equality on the road, that you have a right to make decisions about being courteous or insisting on your priority, and that doesn't fit in with their belief that the motor is king of the road and all others are there as a favour or shouldn't be there at all.

Never seen anyone take their resentment to such beserk lengths, obviously.

Avatar
ooblyboo replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
5 likes

Hadn't really thought about it this way before but that is an interesting theory.

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to BalladOfStruth | 2 years ago
5 likes

Truly bizarre, yet entirely plausible given my experience on the roads of Britain.

Avatar
brooksby replied to BalladOfStruth | 2 years ago
9 likes

BalladOfStruth wrote:

Having read this and the accompanying article, I feel like I’m missing something. He felt so affronted by a cyclist getting out of his way that he felt attempted murder was the only option? What?!

Maybe the cyclist didn't bow down and doff his helmet?

Pages

Latest Comments