A driver who told a cyclist “I’m going to kill you” before ramming him with his car has been jailed for 10 months after being found guilty of dangerous driving.
Bradley Harris of Northop, Flintshire, was also banned from driving for 20 months and will have to pass an extended retest to regain his licence, reports the Daily Post.
Mold Crown Court heard that Harris, aged 27, was driving his Audi A3 on Northop High Street at around 8am on 21 April last year, with cyclist Michael Edge riding in the opposite direction.
Phil Clemo, prosecuting, said that Mr Edge thought that Harris, who was driving an Audi A3, would slow down so they could get past each other, but when he didn’t, the cyclist moved into a layby to enable the driver to pass him.
According to Mr Clemo, Harris “felt deeply affronted” at the cyclist moving to one side.
CCTV images showed the driver reversing down the High Street “at speed” then making a three-point turn and driving after Mr Edge.
Harris then shouted at the cyclist: “I'm going to knock you off. I'm going to kill you,” then deliberately swerved at him, with the cyclist sustaining injured ankles among other injuries.
When interviewed by police, however, Harris tried to claim that it was the cyclist who had instigated the confrontation, and denied that he had caused his injuries, insisting the exchange had been purely verbal.
In mitigation, Robin Boag said that Harris had experienced “a few moments’ loss of control” due to stress and that he took that out on the cyclist.
He added that his client was well aware of the potential effects of dangerous driving, having lost his father in a road traffic collision when he was a child.
Judge Niclas Parry, however, described what Harris had done as an “appalling piece of deliberate dangerous driving” in which he used his vehicle “as a weapon,” adding that the only appropriate punishment was imprisonment.
Add new comment
37 comments
See I read the article on the Daily Post the opposite way. This sentence "Mr Edge "didn't think a lot" about moving into a layby to make space before carrying on with his journey, with the prosecution saying that he "experienced this a lot" as a regular cyclist." in particular
The way I read that sentence was that there was a layby for the cyclist to use but because they were an experienced rider they felt comfortable continuing on the road without diving out of the way of the motorist. Which IMHO is a more likely situation which would trigger the driver.
Having looked at google maps it sounds like the rider would likely be passing a row of parked cars on their side of the road, with the Audi driver not waiting until the rider finished passing the parked cars.... then the Audi driver taking objection to the cyclist not using a gap in the parked cars to let him past. (p.s. that's all speculation on my part and is no way suggesting that the cyclist did anything wrong)
I am partial to a bit of speculation and I suspect that the 'it happens a lot' is a reference to cars failing to give way at parked cars on their side of the road and driving straight at an oncoming cyclist.
I would think this is the likely view the cyclist had and they pulled into the layby outside the shop because the car didn't wait behind the parked cars on their side.
If it had been me, I may have over-exaggerated a swerve into the layby to make a point. That might rile a certain type of motorist, as they could think I had not appreciated the tiny gap they had planned to give me.
Me yellin oi at a nob parked in the bus stop / cycle lane (yeah, shitty infra) was eniugh to get chased down, forced off the road, punched kicked by the pair of them then a cricket bat to the bike wheel for good measure.
definite nobs.
I have noticed in recent years a tendency in a very small minority of motorists to be affronted if a cyclist offers them courtesy, e.g. waving them out of a junction or stopping to allow them to come down a single lane between parked cars first, most people say thank you but from the odd one you get a frown or even occasionally the finger. I think it must be something to do with their thinking that in ceding to them you are somehow claiming an equality on the road, that you have a right to make decisions about being courteous or insisting on your priority, and that doesn't fit in with their belief that the motor is king of the road and all others are there as a favour or shouldn't be there at all.
Never seen anyone take their resentment to such beserk lengths, obviously.
Hadn't really thought about it this way before but that is an interesting theory.
Truly bizarre, yet entirely plausible given my experience on the roads of Britain.
Maybe the cyclist didn't bow down and doff his helmet?
Pages