Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Hit-and-run uninsured and unlicensed driver who seriously injured cyclist avoids jail

Judge told Brandon Tate that he escaped custodial sentence “by the skin of your teeth”

A judge has told an unlicensed and uninsured driver who seriously injured a cyclist than fled the scene that he had escaped jail “by the skin of your teeth.” In response to the case, the national cycling charity Cycling UK has repeated its call on the government to make good on its pledge to reform sentencing in road traffic cases.

The male cyclist sustained life-changing injuries when he was hit by a car driven by 23-year-old Brandon Tate in Washington, Tyne & Wear on 16 June last year, reports the Sunderland Echo.

The motorist, from South Shields, failed to stop but reportedly returned to the scene on foot shortly afterwards to ask how the victim was faring, but failed to call the emergency services, South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court heard.

He then left again, and sent his step-sister and her two children, all of whom had been passengers in the borrowed Peugeot car at the time of the crash, back to the scene.

The step-sister, who was described as “distraught,” took 15 minutes to call 999, with the court told that she possibly delayed through not wishing to implicate Tate.

The cyclist sustained injuries to his foot and leg, including a damaged artery, and was in hospital for 12 days afterwards.

Grace Taylor, prosecuting, said: “He decided to hold back and not take the bend. The Peugeot came around the bend on the wrong side of the road and collided with him.

“The first contact was the front bumper, which hit his knee, and the wheel hit his foot.

“He was ejected from the bike, and came to rest on the other side of the road. The Peugeot was nowhere to be seen.

“He was crawling along and he saw the defendant walking, and he asked if he was alright. [The victim] said that he needed an ambulance.

“He said he then heard the sound of car wheels screeching. He then saw a woman and two children.”

Tate, who had no prior convictions, admitted failing to stop after an accident, driving without insurance and driving without a licence.

District Judge Kathryn Meek sentenced him to an 18-month community order and ordered him to undertake 250 hours of unpaid work.

She told him: “You leave for your own reasons, your own cowardly reasons. There’s so many things that you have done wrong here, and I don’t mean bad decisions, criminally wrong. It must have been clear to you there were significant injuries.

“You panicked and you panicked because you knew you shouldn’t have been driving the car, you knew you shouldn’t have been in the car.

“You went off, leaving the injured person and two young children and your step-sister at the scene, having to deal with it.

“Your step-sister was, presumably, torn about how to deal with the situation,” she added. “You are so lucky this wasn’t worse.”

Tate was also banned from driving for 18 months, and was ordered to pay costs of £85 and a £95 victim surcharge.

Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at the charity Cycling UK, told road.cc: “It’s nearly seven years since the [fthen] Secretary of State for Justice Chris Grayling promised a full review of road traffic offences and penalties, but there’s been scant action to progress this since.

“Tougher penalties for ‘hit and run’ drivers who leave the scene of a collision where they knew, or ought to have known, that the collision was likely to have resulted in serious or fatal injury, should have been looked at within this review, and is something Cycling UK has repeatedly called for.

“The maximum penalty for that offence is six months custody, which is perfectly adequate in most cases, but where a victim is left in need of urgent medical attention yet the driver flees without calling for assistance, delaying the provision of a breath test, the courts should have greater sentencing powers.

“There has to be consequences for running away rather than remaining at the scene, calling for help, providing a breath test and co-operating, otherwise there’s almost a perverse incentive to leave.

“The government can take the first step to fixing this and other anomalies with our road traffic laws by doing what it promised in 2014 and reviewing traffic offences and penalties.

“Over 12,000 people have died on our roads since they made that commitment, and further delay is simply disrespectful to the victims of road crashes and their families,” he added.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

64 comments

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
4 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

So on the one hand you have life changing injuries and on the other you have "please don't drive for 18 months". To my mind, someone who panics after a collision and only thinks of themselves is not mature enough to drive - let's keep them off the road permanently as they had their chance to follow the rules.

"Please don't drive for 18 months cos, after coming close to killing someone, you have to be asked politely not to do the thing that you were doing illegally when you inflicted the injuries on the victim" 

Did that sentence not make sense? Much like the judge's then...

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
13 likes

I am only surprised that Judge Meek did not require the cyclist to write a sincere letter of apology to the court for all the trouble and inconvenience he has caused.

Avatar
the little onion | 3 years ago
15 likes

18th month driving ban? For someone who doesn't actually have a license? Absolute joke.

 

Surely should be a decade-long driving ban

 

Institutionally anti-cyclist. 

Avatar
EK Spinner | 3 years ago
13 likes

Good gawdm not even a suspended sentence to ensure he gets locked up next time he gets caught. He has already proven that he doesn't believe rules of law (you need a licence and insurance) or society (The victim is injured and the pair of them take over 15 mins before calling an ambulance) apply to him. The quicker selfish scum like this are made to understand that they cannot opt out of society then the better the world will be for all

Pages

Latest Comments