Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Lorry driver killed cyclist three months after his licence was revoked because of his eyesight

“You should have seen her but you failed to do so”

The lorry driver who hit and killed cyclist Josephine Gilbert in Derby was driving unlicenced and uninsured, having had his licence revoked 12 weeks earlier due to concerns over his eyesight and diabetes. Herbert Wyatt has been jailed for 45 months and banned from driving for five years and three months.

Josephine Gilbert, aged 25, was riding on the A52 Ashbourne Road close to the Markeaton Island roundabout when she was hit from behind by Wyatt on January 21.

The Derby Telegraph reports that she suffered catastrophic head injuries and died instantly.

In interview Wyatt claimed he had moved out to overtake and that Gilbert had “rode out into him”.

However, dashcam footage showed Gilbert riding consistently in a straight line and near the kerb.

“She was wearing bright orange cycling clothing, a pink and black cycling helmet and was riding straight,” said Lisa Hardy, prosecuting.

“There was no traffic coming towards her, visibility was good and he had 17 seconds of her in his vision to move out and overtake her if he wished. But the defendant effectively mowed down the deceased, driving over her in a straight line.”

Wyatt’s licence to drive lorries had been revoked in October – information he kept from his employer and which also meant he was uninsured.

He was said to have tried to deceive both the DVLA and his doctor over his eyesight.

Hardy said: “He reiterated repeatedly he’d had no issues with the DVLA, but when all of the checks were made it was clear that was not the case.

“Just the day before he had spoken to a clerk at the DVLA and admitted he knew he was unlicensed to drive large vehicles.”

Wyatt pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving; causing death by driving a vehicle while uninsured; and causing death by dangerous driving while unlicensed.

Sentencing him, Judge Jonathan Bennett said: “The tragedy about this case was that it would have been avoided but for two features.

“One, you should not have been driving that vehicle and you knew that. Secondly, you should have seen her.

“I have had the misfortune of viewing the footage and you can see the deceased for 17 second after coming off the roundabout.

“She was wearing bright orange clothing, a pink and orange helmet, there was no traffic, nothing was coming the other way. You should have seen her but you failed to do so.

“You demonstrated a callous disregard for others culminating in this tragic incident, cutting short the life of Josephine and devastating her family.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

40 comments

Avatar
ktache | 3 years ago
15 likes

My thoughts ate with the family and friends of Josephine Gilbert.

Whilst no sentence could ever make up for her senseless killing, I'm glad the driver is going to prison for some time, though I do wonder why the driving ban was not for the rest of his life.

Neither his eyesight or ability to drive will improve anytime soon.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to ktache | 3 years ago
20 likes

Saying this again - anyone that is found culpable for taking someone's life whilst driving should get an automatic lifetime ban. They've had their chance to prove that they can behave responsibly on the road and tragically failed.

Avatar
zero_trooper replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
2 likes

Upticking you every time! laugh

Avatar
kil0ran | 3 years ago
10 likes

Blimey, a 100% "Hang him" response in the Derby Telegraph comments, makes a change

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to kil0ran | 3 years ago
2 likes

Everyone can imagine the family car crushed to oblivion under an HGV.

Avatar
kil0ran | 3 years ago
6 likes

45 months so that equates to 7 years without his discount. How is it not the maximum sentence considering all the contributing circumstances? He can drive again in a little over 5 years.

I'd be happier with a life driving ban and ditch the prison sentence. If you're a pilot or a ship's captain caught drunk on duty, or with a medical issue preventing full capacity, you're banned for life. Why aren't "professional" drivers held to the same standard? 

Avatar
Grahamd replied to kil0ran | 3 years ago
5 likes

kil0ran wrote:

I'd be happier with a life driving ban and ditch the prison sentence.

What deterrent would that be to someone who has lost their licence already?

Whilst I am not a fan of prisons a message does need to be sent. Whether this is strong enough message is questionable, but I would jail every motorist who caused harm to anybody,  if they did not hold a driving licence. For any "professional" drivers I would double the penalty.

 

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
3 likes

Just what do you need to do to get a maximum sentence for this sort of thing? Or even half of the maximum?

Avatar
oceandweller replied to EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
3 likes

Cut up Paul Dacre? Damage a Cabinet Minister's car?

Avatar
makadu replied to EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
0 likes

EddyBerckx wrote:

Just what do you need to do to get a maximum sentence for this sort of thing? Or even half of the maximum?

Run over a policeman it seems

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-devon-55317631

6 1/2 years after pleading guilty.

I think the discounting system should also be looked at - circumstances of the offence and how far down the process has the offender gone before pleading guilty - seems to me you get the same discount changing your plea half way through a trial as you get if you confessed up front.

 

Pages

Latest Comments