Following reports of anti-social behaviour and abusive language towards visitors, including a councillor who felt that he was threatened after pointing out to three men they couldn't ride their bikes on British Camp in Malvern, calls to install clear signage to deter cyclists have been made, amidst concerns about damage caused by cyclists riding atop the historic site.
British Camp in the Malvern Hills, Herefordshire is an Iron Age Norman hill fort located at the top of Herefordshire Beacon and thought to have been first constructed in the second century BC. The areas surrounding the hill fort, which is designated as a scheduled monument, has beautiful cycling trails and is a popular flocking site for many mountain bikers, besides being host to the annual Malverns Classic Mountain Bike Festival.
However, after the reports of abusive and anti-social behaviour, cyclists have been told by the police that such actions will not be tolerated, and that all cyclists should familiarise themselves with the maps of the hills to learn where they can and cannot ride. West Mercia Police also said that they will be stepping up its patrols in the area as a result of the recent events.
One of the visitors allegedly abused by cyclists was Malvern Hills district councillor Paul Bennett. Last week, the Lib-Dem councillor told the Malvern Gazette that he was simply trying to tell three mountain bikers something he thought they might not have known, as there is no signage telling people they can't ride their bikes on British Camp.
He said: "The men were very hostile, I felt threatened as they were swearing, being very abusive and kept saying 'Don't you have anything better to do?'
"I was polite but they were in no mood to talk and it was unwarranted hostility. I think if I had asked them if they wanted an ice cream I would have had the same reaction from them."
Following this incident, Bennet has raised a call for 'No Cycling' signs to be installed at the British Camp and help deter cyclists and prevent any further damage to it, reports Worcester News.
> Cyclists accused of causing “unlawful” damage to nature reserve by digging up “important habitat” to create mountain bike jumps
Although there is one bridleway that skirts the lower slopes of British Camp above the reservoir, cycling elsewhere on the monument is not permitted (Andrew Gustar on Flickr, licensed via CC BY-ND 2.0)
Malvern Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) said it has also received reports of antisocial mountain bikers at British Camp. A spokesperson for Malvern SNT said: "This area of the Malvern Hills is one that we patrol on a regular basis and will not tolerate abusive and offensive language from other users of the Hills.
"We patrol on bikes most commonly, to allow us to cover a larger portion of the hills on a single patrol, but cover some areas on foot. Especially as some areas are not permitted for bikes.
"It is appreciated that cyclists occasionally accidentally stray from the approved areas for bikes, but we would encourage cyclists to familiarise themselves with the maps of the hills that are available for free from the Malvern Hills Trust.
"If asked to not cycle in an area, to appreciate that the Malvern Hills Trust staff are just doing their job and are enforcing the restrictions to keep the hills maintained and safe for everyone to enjoy."
> "Who the hell is going up there on a daily basis, unless they happen to be Chris Froome?": Councillor slams hilly cycle path plan and claims those who do use it will be "flying up and down" using it as "racetrack"
Cllr Bennett added: "British camp won't exist eventually as every time people go with bikes there is further damage. We all need to make sure it isn't damaged, as we're custodians of the future. It's important we preserve it when we can, as it's a focal point for tourism for the entire area."
In 2021, we reported that a barbed wire was strung across the Malvern Hills cycling trails, with the Trust saying that it was “gravely concerned” over the discovery of the trap for cyclists.
While tales of councillors celebrating thousands of pounds raked in by fining anti-social cyclists (such as the 82-year-old Barrie Enderby who famously told the council to "stick it up their a*se") riding in Grimsby and more recently, "rogue cowboy council wardens" lying in wait to jump cyclists in Colchester and issue them fines are well-known and widely reported on this website, in July, young cyclists were accused by conservationists of causing “serious” damage to a nature reserve by digging up parts of the earth to create mountain bike jumps.
According to the Wildlife Trust, a section of wildflower meadow at Cross Hill Quarry, a former quarry site and green space located just outside Clitheroe, has been dug up in recent weeks to create a number of small jumps, an act the Trust claims is “unlawful”.
“The quarry floor at Cross Hill Quarry is one of the most important areas on the site for wildflowers. In fact, just next to the damaged area an orchid was in flower, and countless other important species associated with these limestone grasslands may have been lost,” Kim Coverdale, East Lancashire’s Reserves Officer for the Trust, said in response to the ramps’ creation.
The news came just days after a group of children in Wales were threatened by residents after they cleared a woodland of litter to create a cycle track, which the local housing association claimed was anti-social behaviour that was causing “severe damage” to the area.
Add new comment
53 comments
You are being way too defensive about this. The councillor didn't even claim the riders had caused damage, he said he spoke to them as they may not have been aware - due to lack of signage - that cycling was not permitted on the monument and got abuse in return. He hasn't said "all cyclists are the same and must be banned" as you claim; he was simply pointing out that cycling is, perfectly sensibly, not permitted on the monument. There are places where it's proportionate and sensible not to allow cycling, just as there are places it's p&s not to allow driving and in some cases even walking. Reacting as if any limitation on cycling must be a massive attack on cycling and cyclists or, in your words, acting "as if everyone who rides a bike is some sort of plague on society which must be expunged at all costs" (something which isn't even close to a fair representation of what the councillor said or did) is just histrionic.
On the subject of who causes most damage (aside from it being another contrived 'competition'), I don't think the issue is as simple as that, it's who does the most damage when being less responsible. A wheel may roll over objects and often cause less damage than a shoe or boot treading on it, but a skidding tyre will quite likely cause more damage than a stomped foot. A responsible walker would step away from the edge of a drop (as they have time to decide) whereas a cyclist may either be ride close to that edge either out of irresponsibility or lack of reaction time. I'd argue that, most of the time, walking will cause less damage to vulnerable areas, but it's clearly not a black and white situation.
Yep, there's a difference to riding carefully whilst keeping to the gravel paths and dragging the back wheel at speed down the grassy earthwork embankments. Without that context it's hard to know how reasonable the complaint is.
However, if cycling is totally forbidden (and perhaps walking off the marked path too), then that ought to be signed and people shouldn't be riding there.
As far as I know, the only research into which caused the most damage, boots or bikes, found that it was boots.
If, rather than a trail used by cyclists, there were a road used by cars running over the monument, would they stop the cars?
That analogy doesn't make sense though. Foot trails have usually been around the same amount of time as the ancient sites themselves. You're not suggesting cars were driving 'over' the fort during the Iron Age?
This is a site of scientific and historical interest and needs to be preserved.
Whataboutery is not helpful. Anyway, plenty of places cars can't go, eg bridleways
Well there isn't a road or a trail so the question does not arise. If people were riding dirt bikes or driving Land Rovers over the monument then of course they'd be stopped. This really isn't a case, as your comment seems to imply, of cyclists being picked on unfairly, it's a case of a few cyclists being bloody stupid and potentially causing damage to a site of huge historical significance in an area where there are a huge number of permitted off-road routes for them to use.
Including those with mountain bikes on the rack?
Do they have roosts nearby?
Collective noun for mountain bikers. Any ideas? 'Rookery' might be an option.
It's a misprint. Much of the rest of the article is questionable on grammar and sense grounds.
Flocking loads.
I would like to see exactly what 'damage' has been done by cyclists, and how this suffers from any damage by walkers. It's all a bit vague, but while not condoning anti social behaviour, presumably from a very small number of cyclists, some reports seem to be exaggerated, for effect.
Interestingly most research has shown that trail damage by cyclists and walkers is about the same - I may point you towards this article which links the studies: https://www.mbr.co.uk/news/research-reveals-walkers-do-more-damage-to-tr...
You haven't looked far. Deep ruts that wreck the ground. Unless, perhaps, very wide tyres. Hard soled heavy walking boots also do damage that can take years for ground to recover - so they're also discouraged in some places
Crikey! I, too, am supporting the police on this matter.
I never thought I'd see this day ...
*checks sky for thunder clouds before leaving house * 🤣🤣
I'm with the councillor on this (unusually!). What kind of nob thinks riding a bike through a Scheduled Ancient Monument is even a thing.
Seconded. I read the headline and was all geared up to become righteously indignant, then read the article and I think he has a point. Nobody is complaining about you riding your bike to get there, just saying don't ride your bike (or e-scooter or motorcycle, for that matter) on the ancient monument...
Thirded. Plus you can ride a bike (or horse) over pretty much the rest of the Malverns (ok, some of the slopes are a bit steep for even the bravest downhiller).
Perhaps Henry II was skidding an e-mtb when he destroyed the medieval castle. Or perhaps he was just angry about new builds on ancient sites. At any rate he did such a good job that I had to check Wikipedia when I read 'Norman' in the article.
Probably just nicked the stone to build a jump ramp.
As the story has now been clarified both by an onlooker and the folks themselves, I can honestly say, anyone who think riding a bike through a scheduled monument is a thing, is a nob, but these folks were not, having pushed their bikes.
Pages