So many riders these days are rather reliant on GPS devices and platforms such as Strava and komoot for their every move on two wheels, they may never have experienced 'serious' cycling in any other way.
At times it could even seem as if these ‘wired’ riders scowl at the very idea of occasionally ditching their connections and simply riding for the sake of riding bikes. Is this performance and stat-based approach versus just riding something that differentiates, perhaps even divides us as cyclists, or even as personalities in general?
Let's start with a disclaimer: this is an opinion piece, based not on data or stats but rooted in a lifetime of riding bikes, in all kinds of disciplines and for all kinds of reasons. Sure it may raise some ire, especially from the highly connected crowd, and perhaps the more unplugged amongst us are by nature far less likely to be here reading this anyway!
Different strokes
Of course we are all cyclists, but our personalities and our very reasons for riding bikes can differ dramatically. There are many riders out there who do ride predominantly for competitive reasons, either racing or for personal performance gains. I guess these are the cyclists who are most likely to be wired and driven by devices, and more likely to also chase Strava PB’s, KOM’s and note the stats.
The easy riders?
On the flip side are those who get into cycling for the pure love of riding a bike, for the joy of getting out there in nature, for the escapism it brings, for the adventure potential, and also to escape that competition and connectivity we may well face in every day life. This type of rider is probably far more likely to ride unwired.
Of course there are those, like me, who weave between the two. I have dabbled with various devices and training apps on many occasions in the past, and decided that using them is simply something I do not want to do. Like many of out here, I do also get more than enough of that constantly connected pressure and stats in everyday life as it is.
At first I thought that maybe this was a generational phenomenon, as we didn't have these gadgets years ago. Although, having encountered numerous older riders, especially those who have come to the sport later in life, or perhaps those who have returned to the competitive side after years out, I have found them to be even more device-friendly and performance-driven than some riders half their age. Strangely some of these riders are not always so receptive to the notion of unplugged riding.
> How to maximise your fitness when you get to 40+
A game of numbers
There is no argument that devices and platforms are useful for a number of purposes: monitoring your performance, logging your training, for plotting routes, and even for some inspiration and motivation; however, the thing is that devices and platforms do not make you go faster. They are simply soulless electronic devices that record and display data. They may well help many riders to achieve the stats they want, but then again they can also be extremely limited and restricting, not to mention damaging in some ways too.
Devices and platforms don't care how you feel. They cannot know if you had a bad night’s sleep (most of them anyway), or if you’re going through personal problems, or if you simply don’t feel like riding all out into the howling headwind that they can’t record.
There will be many who disagree, but I think devices and their stats have impacted the ability and incentive (or will) of some cyclists to ride on feel and trust their gut instincts when needed.
That feel-good factor
Being able to ride purely on feel is a great asset for any competitive cyclist to have, and also for us unplugged and non-competitive riders out there. Simply learning how your body, and possibly more importantly your mind, reacts and deals with situations and stresses is a core element to performance gain. At the end of the day, this is what makes the difference when it comes to the crunch and when the stats are all about even. No matter what the computer says, only you can judge this.
Then there are the mental health implications of being device and platform-led. There are those who thrive on chasing KOMs/QOMs and PBs, and many out there who may take a hit to their morale when they compare themselves – or rather compare their stats – to virtual data posted by others online; data of which the circumstances are not always entirely clear.
This is something that can be very deterring for many younger riders who are perhaps just getting into cycling in particular, many of whom may not actually want to race. They may be seeking that elusive escapism from the harshness of their everyday life, and may not be looking for even more life competition.
Why not unplug for a while?
Nobody here is telling you to get rid of the Garmin or to sacrifice your Strava account, as they have plenty to offer; but there is so much more to cycling than stats and data. I think that a good proportion of riders today are missing out on the simple pleasures of going out for a ride. Not ‘training’, just going for a ride, and taking a route you’ve never been on before.
There’s a lot to be said to just heading out with little or no end goal other than to have fun, with the ride as long or short, as fast or slow as you feel like. Just going with the flow, living in the moment, and being curious and exploring as you do it.
Despite what some may think, you can ride just as hard – perhaps even harder – by unplugging. There’s no “computer says no” scenario, it’s all down to you to decide and to learn your own limits, which devices can only but guess at. You never know, by going unplugged and riding on emotion and feel you may well learn a whole lot more about yourself, and see a completely different side to cycling too.
There really is nothing to lose by riding unplugged at times. You may even enjoy the experience more than hitting that segment PB. Hell, you could even just stash away your device and check it later if that all sounds too harsh of a detox, which would maybe even give you another view of things all together...
Add new comment
25 comments
And yes, it's probably worth adding, the bike in Strava is not used for me to achieve goals, it's more for statistics of the total distance, because I ride only for my own pleasure 🌳🏞️💚🦉
I agree in many ways with the author of the article, when I was a supporter of not using any applications, and especially Strava, but then I tried it and it turned out to be quite normal, and if you want to systematize your workouts, it doesn’t have to be a cycling trip, but also jogging, walking for health or strength and cross fit and even yoga, this may well help you. The best communication is live with your friends and acquaintances, but if they are not around, then why not find loved ones there? 🧡🧡🧡 And also since I joined your interesting site since yesterday 🌞🍵🫖🎶🎶🦉) I'm wondering if there's a common group or community here on Strava?
Mostly, I use a Wahoo because I have no sense of direction or memory for routes and it's useful to be able to redo an interesting route I did a few months ago, or to plan a Sunday club ride so that there's an approximately equal number of km before and after the mid-ride coffee & cake stop.
I got my thinnest in the year I got into Strava because I did find KOM hunting motivating. But my wife pointed out that racing on the roads with cars all the time is dangerous so I gave it up. I am older now and there are more cyclists so I would not be able to get onto leaderboards if I started again. Google activity tells me my mileage.
The only thing I miss is Strava flyby, which is good for finding out who you passed if you both are using Strava.
https://labs.strava.com/flyby/viewer/
That functionality is massively reduced as it used to be default on and now is default off. I did use it alot to get recommended routes for leisure cycling by checking out fly-bys of others.
The gizmos we cyclists are sold as 'must haves' are the embodiment of the McNamara fallacy, not everything that can be measured counts and not everything that counts can be measured. For me at least the very best cycling's about exploration not perspiration.
Quote from a former US president, "Comparison is the thief of joy."
I somewhat agree, it's good to have all my exercise records. But for me it can be disheartening seeing how far down the rankings you are when you think you've just smashed a climb and feel strong.
Don't be disheartened by other people's records, there's no knowing how genuine they are. Living in London, plenty of leaderboards are topped by people who have quite obviously, deliberately or otherwise, left Strava on while they have been in the car or on a motorbike, unless there really are people capable of sustaining 50 mph+ over ten miles out there. There are also plenty of people who "forget" to turn Strava onto the ebike setting...on segments near the Heathrow flight path you even get leaderboards topped by people who've left the app on when flying, apparently cruising through Hounslow at 300mph!
The only useful comparison I find on the app is comparing my current efforts with my previous ones, other than that aged 53 there are always going to be a lot of people out there who can beat me, I'm near the top of my age group so even there...maybe I'll start taking an interest again when I turn 55 and am back at the bottom of an age range.
As well as the data analysis from VeloViewer, I really like one of Strava's lesser features, the heatmaps. Being able to look back over years of rides often encourages / motivates me to want to do particular ones again.
The heat map is also great for finding local roads you haven't ridden at all. One of my favourite things is to lead a group on roads that none of us has ever seen before, despite being within a half day ride of home.
I think that keeping an eye on heart rate is worthwhile to avoid over enthusiasm at the start of a long ride. Then there's the joy of seeing friends' photos, especially from trips away. So I'll stick with GPS and ride logging.
No. GPS/strava is easily the biggest motivational factor for me. Got me riding again after a 15 year break that was then followed by cancer. Even more motivational than the first thing I tried : a new bike.
To me, Strava was a great tool. A great motivator to ride more, and a magnificent source of great routes. I'd either be told about them, or I would simply see where people are riding and do that myself. In order to ride a lot of those (quite long and hilly) routes I needed to get better, and it allowed me to see if I was getting better.
But there is also a flip side. When I found myself shivering, riding in a drizzle on a cold, dark and unpleasant autumn day, because I "had to" ride to achieve my weekly or monthly distance, I realised it was counterproductive. The primary goal is to enjoy it. So I stopped joining the distance challenges. And it was fine.
It is your decision. I don't know if I am in some way different than other people, but I don't have to take drastic steps to regulate my behaviour. I don't need to leave facebook or twitter or instagram etc. I can just ignore them. I might ride an extra loop to reach some "whole" distance when I'm tired and just want to go home, or I might just remember that this number is quite arbitrary and not at all whole, in, say, miles. I might take the longer route to make the ride a fondo, or I might decide that getting rid of my headache is more important, and finish with 98km ridden. It is your choice.
When I do find myself checking my current power or speed etc. too often, I switch the thing to energy save mode. The screen turns off and you need to wake it by pressing a button when you need it. We should all do it more often. We're supposed to be in the moment, take it all in, instead of acting as a chief engineer on the enterprise and keeping the dilithium core at the correct output level.
yep similar experience to mine, though my OCD would never let me finish on a 98km ride,if Ive ridden that far already another 2km isnt going to hurt me however bad I feel and Ill make it 2.5 just to make sure my garmin doesnt shortchange on it.
I think the point articles like this miss is there are lots of ways to use Strava, that are perfectly healthy for the mind & soul, it doesnt mean you are always a meta pro obsessing over stats just because you use an app. Yes those people exist but Id suspect they would be doing that even if Strava never existed.
I use Strava to record how far I ride, how fast Im going to measure my fitness, and share my rides with my friends, who do similar, Im never going to trouble any QoM leaderboards, or break massive distance records, but I do like setting personal bests and setting myself goals.
that said any tips at restoring motivation to ride heartily appreciated.
With so many more shark-head carnivors on the road these days, the whole KOM thing, for me at least, is ancient history. Kinda fun (and safer) at the time, but a fad 7-10 years ago, and now it's more about quality of ride and memories riding with people I like.
Educated guess, but it would not surprise me if the rate of change of (road) segment KOMs (gravel is a relatively new phenom) is low presently and that most are locked out amongst a select few high cat competitive athletes in a given area. If the elites happen to pass through then expect to go from #1 to #100 quicker than the proverbial (high cats included).
The parlous battery life on my Garmin led me to switch the screen off during rides: I can now go by feel while actually out there, and pore obsessively over the stats when I get home. Win-win would be overstating it, but it works for me.
No thanks. I love my data, stats and seeing where others have ridden.
there are so many ways to use data and gps which facilitate a non competive approach to riding ( though all are still susceptble) having found KOM's past there sell by date most of my interest is monitoring general fitness. The big motivator is doing Explorer Tiling (veloviewer) to find new routes and places rather than the repetitive rides that have become a staple of so much riding.
Heart rate, gradient and cadence are all you really need so that you can judge not going into the red and therefore ride further for longer
All these stats are all very well if you're going for maximum performance capability - but none of them show me what I want to know, which is how much my cycle rides affect my expected lifespan, i.e., is being able to shave a minute off a particular route likely to make me live for longer and of so, by how much?
"the thing is that devices and platforms do not make you go faster"
Hmm not true. They motivate you to go faster.
I know if I have my garmin showing my speed I will go faster than if I didn't. In the same way if you have a rider half way up the hill in front of you to chase, you will go faster than if you didn't, or best of all when running late for work I have achieved some of my best averages 😁
I only use data tools like Strava to prove to my wife that I was *actually* doing what I said I was going to be doing ... and not really doing Sylvia in the next village.
That me and her 'husband' appear to do exactly the same route, with exactly the same metrix info doesn't cross her mind ...
Strava isn't only about performance. I like seeing where other people have ridden, which can lead to new routes for me, and looking at the photos er media that they post and the comments underneath. Same goes for devices in general, they're not just about performance. With a computer on my bars I can follow a route in unfamiliar places, very useful if on new territory, and keep an eye on time and distance because I have family obligations. Which maybe the writer of the article doesn't? We can't all float about like clouds...
I wouldn't leave home on a bike without my Wahoo running and the app on my phone running. This is principally so that the live tracking works so my wife can find me if she needs to. My rides then automatically upload to Strava, but to be quite honest I never look at it, and these days rarely get or give Kudos.
A lot of the so called analysis on Strava is nonsense anyway. To prove myself a liar, last weekend I did exactly the same route on Saturday and Monday and I wnet of Strava specifically to compare them. The one in which I KNEW I had worked harder but had achieved a 1kph lower average speed due to an extra 12kph of wind was rated as less intense inspite of me using a heart rate monitor.
I will carry on using Strava, but principally to record my total miles and nothing more.
Always good to take a break from the numbers.....to be honest.... this past year when me and my cycle buddies have done more Gravel and Bikepacking where numbers are secondary to Navigation, the adventure has been more important. Still nice to collect the stats and distances for Strava etc....but makes cycling much better.
Must admit that recently, I find myself only looking at the map on my Wahoo with just distance to cue and GPS accuracy as data fields. Probably explains my current massive drop in average speed!