Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Café Roubaix could keep name after Fuji owner wades into Specialized row

ASI, which licences Roubaix trademark to Specialized in US, says it had no right to register name in Canada

The owner of the Café Roubaix bike shop in Alberta, Canada may be allowed to keep the name after Advanced Sports International (ASI), owner of the Fuji bikes brand and which licences the ‘Roubaix’ name to Specialized in the United States, stepped in to say it would be happy for him to use it. ASI’s CEO also says that Specialized had no right to register the name in Canada.

News that Specialized, which has registered ‘Roubaix’ as a trademark in Canada, was threatening the shop owner Dan Richter, who also sells carbon wheels under his Café Roubaix brand, with legal action, prompted accusations of bullying against the California-based bicycle manufacturer on social media at the weekend.

But Pat Cunnane, ASI’s CEO, has told the American trade publication Bicycle Retailer that Specialized did not have the power under the licensing agreement with ASI to register the ‘Roubaix’ name in Canada and that his company was happy for Richter to use it.

Cunnane said: “We have reached out to Mr. Richter to inform him that he can continue to use the name, and we will need to license his use, which we imagine can be done easily.

He added that his company has been trying to contact both Richter and Specialized, so far without response.

“We are in the process of notifying Specialized that they did not have the authority, as part of our license agreement, to stop Daniel Richter... from using the Roubaix name,” he added.

“While ASI does have the authority to object to Mr. Richter’s use of the name and while we at ASI understand the importance of protecting our bicycle model names, we believe that Mr. Richter did not intend for consumers to confuse his brick-and-mortar establishment or his wheel line with our Roubaix road bike.

“And we believe consumers are capable of distinguishing his bike shop and wheel line from our established bikes.”

Specialized registered the ‘Roubaix’ name in Canada in 2007 for “Bicycles, bicycle frames, and bicycle components, namely bicycle handlebars, bicycle front fork, and bicycle tires.”

Larry Koury, Specialized Canada’s managing director, told the Calgary Herald at the weekend that "A simple trademark search [by Richter] would have prevented this,” adding, “We are required to defend or lose our trademark registration"

However, ASI’s Cunnane pointed out that while Fuji, which has a Roubaix model in its range, had never registered the trademark in Canada, it had been using it there since before Specialized licensed the name from ASI in the United States in 2007.

“Like many trademark owners, ASI does not register its trademarks in every country and never tried to register the mark in Canada,” he explained.

“ASI only recently learned of Specialized’s registration of the Roubaix trademark in Canada and ASI’s position is that Specialized’s registration of the mark in Canada was inappropriate under the terms of their license agreement.

“ASI has used the mark in Canada for well over 10 years, giving it first-use trademark rights in Canada.”

Cunnane also said that ASI has in the past drawn up agreements with other parties regarding trademarks, giving the example of Gran Fondo, which it uses in the United States, while under a co-existence agreement, BMC uses the trademark in Europe.

Richter, who served with the Canadian armed forces in Afghanistan, opened his high-end bike shop in Cochrane, Alberta in March this year.

He used his life savings, military severance pay and money he was awarded due to post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD) to fund the opening of the shop, which deals in high-end bikes, and says that getting the business up and running has helped him cope with his PTSD.

But even though he believes he has a strong case against Specialized, with his lawyer estimating legal costs of in excess of C$150,000 to fight the American company’s claim, it looked as though he might be forced to acquiesce to its demands and change the shop’s name.

ASI’s intervention means that Richter may not now have to do that, and far from having to come up with a new brand and rebuild it from scratch, the publicity he has gained is unlikely to have harmed his fledgling business.

The Calgary Herald said yesterday that while it had not yet been able to speak to Richter about ASI's intervention, he had been touched by the support he received, including people from around the world ordering products from his website - he's currently getting more Café Roubaix t-shirts printed after running out of stock.

"This is encouraging and exciting, and I’m finding it very humbling as well,” he said. “I’m really amazed by the level of support. It’s overwhelming.”

“We were ready to roll over. Maybe now we can come to an agreement,” he added. “We’ve always been willing to compromise.”

While Specialized has yet to formally respond, it’s fair to say the company is not coming out of the episode well.

Many users of Facebook and Twitter have said they will never buy one of its products again as a result of its threat of legal action against Richter and are calling on others to boycott the brand.

Nor is the fact that it is ASI that has put forward a solution to allow Richter to keep using the Café Roubaix name likely to reflect well on Specialized; irrespective of Cunnane’s assertion that it went beyond its powers in registering the trademark in Canada, the company had its own opportunity to back down that it has now missed.

While social media has played a crucial role in bringing the case to international attention, even before the days of Twitter and Facebook similar stories of brands taking what was perceived as heavy handed tactics to protect their trademarks have at times gained global media attention.

In 1986, the small New Zealand town of Otorohanga changed its name for a time to Harrodsville after then owner of the Harrods department store Mohamed Al-Fayed sought to take legal action against restaurant owner Henry Harrod, who had named his restaurant after himself.

Other businesses in the town also changed their names to Harrods, and the scorn heaped on Al-Fayed in the media in Britain and elsewhere led to him backing down.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

53 comments

Avatar
mr-andrew | 11 years ago
0 likes

It seems as if this is becoming something of a habit for Specialized. Anyone remember the court case against Volagi in which they won $1 in damages? That garnered a fair amount of bad press, but nothing on this level. It seems as if their heavy handed legal department isn't doing them any favours at the moment.

Avatar
LondonDynaslow | 11 years ago
0 likes

I still love my Roubaix but I'm glad it's in the garage til the spring. I'd be embarrassed to be seen on it at the moment.

Avatar
Fran The Man replied to LondonDynaslow | 11 years ago
0 likes

"Embarrassed", deblemund? My Roubaix's in the cupboard under the stairs right now, but I can't wait to get it out again and ride it with pride! Well done to ASI for stepping in and sorting out this silly business before the Canadian vet suffers from more PTSD – Post Traumatic Specialized Disorder!

Avatar
LondonDynaslow replied to Fran The Man | 11 years ago
0 likes

Ok maybe that was an overreaction! Looking forward to riding her with new wheels  105

Avatar
lukea-d | 11 years ago
0 likes

and to the right of this forum - an ad from Hargroves Cycles reading "Specialized sale now on"! I can't see that leading to too many clicks.

Avatar
allez neg | 11 years ago
0 likes

Down with this sort of thing

Avatar
mooleur replied to allez neg | 11 years ago
0 likes
allez neg wrote:

Down with this sort of thing

Careful now!

Avatar
jellysticks replied to allez neg | 11 years ago
0 likes
allez neg wrote:

Down with this sort of thing

Careful now

Avatar
caaad10 | 11 years ago
0 likes

I'm going to build a bicycle and call it "New York" or similar, then register the name in europe.....

Avatar
badback replied to caaad10 | 11 years ago
0 likes
caaad10 wrote:

I'm going to build a bicycle and call it "New York" or similar, then register the name in europe.....

Or even better Morgan Hill.

PS There's a Roubaix in South Dakota: https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&channel=fflb&q=...

Tickles me that Spesh nicked their current slogan 'I am Specialized' from Spartacus (and Nike). As everyone know's Spartacus rides a Trek.

Avatar
bici1977 | 11 years ago
0 likes

How did Qui-Gon Jinn say? There is always a bigger fish.....

Avatar
dbb | 11 years ago
0 likes

seems like common sense - how did that happen?

Avatar
Alb | 11 years ago
0 likes

Well played Fuji/ASI, well played  41 Specilaized PR team lots to learn from this episode methinks.

Avatar
boardmanrider | 11 years ago
0 likes

I find it un-believeable that Specialized was granted a trademark based on a placename. Then again, this strikes me as being a fairly typical arrogant approach by an American company. How they can appropriate a place not in their own country as their own is remarkable.

I would be very curious as to what the Belgian government or the Mayor of Roubaix says about this. Surely it should be the other way around? Plus what about 'Roubaix' fabric?

What this has done for me is that I'll never, ever buy a Specialized product. I'll go home on with puncture if the only inner available to me is made by Specialized.

Avatar
thebungle replied to boardmanrider | 11 years ago
0 likes
boardmanrider wrote:

I would be very curious as to what the Belgian government or the Mayor of Roubaix says about this. Surely it should be the other way around? Plus what about 'Roubaix' fabric?

Why would the Belgian goverment be concerned?

Avatar
boardmanrider replied to thebungle | 11 years ago
0 likes
thebungle wrote:
boardmanrider wrote:

I would be very curious as to what the Belgian government or the Mayor of Roubaix says about this. Surely it should be the other way around? Plus what about 'Roubaix' fabric?

Why would the Belgian goverment be concerned?

Well, my thought would be given that it's a city in Belgium they might have something to say. It's not like Specialized invented the road. They are selling bikes based on a Belgian name. Ok, maybe it's a bad example.

Avatar
surly_by_name replied to boardmanrider | 11 years ago
0 likes

S'in France. I think that's what thebungle was trying to convey. I think the expression you are looking for is "smart ar$e".

Avatar
Simon_MacMichael replied to boardmanrider | 11 years ago
0 likes
boardmanrider wrote:

I find it un-believeable that Specialized was granted a trademark based on a placename. Then again, this strikes me as being a fairly typical arrogant approach by an American company. How they can appropriate a place not in their own country as their own is remarkable.

Why is it 'American' arrogance? Companies all over the world, in all industries, use place names as trademarks and brand names, and unless it's a product that has protected name origin - Parma ham, Champagne, Melton Mowbray pork pies etc - it's fair game and perfectly legal.

The issues here, I think are two-fold. One, that Specialized were way too heavy-handed and could simply have found a way to let Mr Richter use the Roubaix name. No-one was ever going to confuse the two, and no-one outside Alberta would ever have heard of Café Roubaix.

Secondly, we already knew that they used the name in the US under licence, but now ASI are saying they don't believe Specialized had the right to trademark it in Canada - and I'm wondering if they may have shot themselves in the foot there if, say, that gave ASI grounds to terminate the US licence.

Avatar
velobetty replied to Simon_MacMichael | 11 years ago
0 likes
Simon_MacMichael wrote:

Parma ham, Champagne, Melton Mowbray pork pies etc

I feel sorry for the owners of the café in Roubaix. Nobody cares about them, do they?  3

Avatar
cub replied to boardmanrider | 11 years ago
0 likes
boardmanrider wrote:

I'll go home on with puncture if the only inner available to me is made by Specialized.

Lets not get carried away here.

Avatar
GerardR replied to cub | 11 years ago
0 likes

Well, if I had a puncture and was being particularly philosophically pure, I'd be quite happy to be carried away rather than perambulate (just working the "p" angle).

Avatar
surly_by_name replied to boardmanrider | 11 years ago
0 likes

Here's how trade marks (and patents) work. In the old days, the registrar of trade marks (or the patent office) would examine your application in detail including existing marks, names, etc (or the prior art) and then grant or decline to grant trade mark (or patent). That detailed review function cost money that governments decided could be saved by effectively outsourcing the role of scrutinising a mark (or a patent) to private litigants. (In any trade mark or patent case, the respondent will almost inevitably counter claim for invalidity.) So now applications for trade marks (and patents) are given only cursory scrutiny, then advertised in the government gazette and then granted, the theory being that if someone has a problem with the mark (or patent) then they will challenge it. This kind of works but tends to favour the deep pocketed over the small. Specialized's statement that they needed to act to defend their mark - or the mark that they believed they had the right to use in the relevant territory - ("protect it or lose it") is probably correct and I have some sympathy with their legal position but as a PR exercise they've cocked this up mightily.

Avatar
jmaccelari | 11 years ago
0 likes

Good on Fuji - and even more brand damage to Specialized. They really seem to be trying to paint themselves in as bad a light as possible. I for one will be avoiding their brand in future.

Pages

Latest Comments