Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Bollards installed on new cycle lane outside hospital after drivers immediately block it

Complaints as new cycling infrastructure outside Bristol Royal Infirmary instantly blocked by parked vehicles

Bristol City Council acted quickly to place bollards on a cycle lane outside a hospital in the city, that after the newly installed cycling infrastructure was immediately blocked by drivers' parked vehicles.

The situation unfolded on Upper Maudlin Street, outside Bristol Royal Infirmary, after local cyclists quickly complained that a new painted cycle lane was soon unusable due to the number of parked vehicles in it, a video shared on social media showing the extent of the parking.

Parking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, BristolParking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol (credit: George Holland/Facebook)

One rider George Holland, who filmed and shared the video online, wrote: "Lovely new cycle infrastructure outside the Bristol Royal Infirmary. Was so optimistic. Instant parking area."

Parking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, BristolParking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol (credit: George Holland/Facebook)

Prior to the cycle lane there had been a temporary bus stop, disabled parking bay and taxi bay in the road space where the cycling infrastructure has now been installed, the image below showing how the street looked in October 2024.

Parking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, BristolParking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol (credit: George Holland/Facebook)

However, despite the double yellow lines and cycle lane running through that space now, not much has changed in terms of the roadside picture, the route still dominated by parked vehicles.

Parking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, BristolParking in bike lane on Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol (credit: FixMyStreet)

 One person who reported the issue to the council wrote on the FixMyStreet portal: "The new bike lane is blocked which is a hazard to cyclists. Some of these cars have Blue Badges. Additional signage should be added on this main route to prevent any cars parking here. Perhaps a no loading/no stopping at anytime sign with regular enforcement. If this is not done, a cyclist will be seriously injured or killed."

Another added: "Cannot use cycle lane due to parked cars all along road — would bollards be possible? Feels unsafe cycling in this area. Love the addition of the cycle lane but unfortunately ruined by disrespectful car users."

> Bristol cyclists most likely to experience bike theft in UK, new study finds – as councillors call for more secure bike hangars to be installed amid "unprecedented demand"

Local rider Holland, who shared the initial video, admitted it was "not an easy equation to balance" as some of those parking in the lane are Blue Badge holders or dropping off vulnerable patients to the hospital. However, others suggested this needed to be addressed by the hospital and council without putting cyclists using the infrastructure at risk.

Ultimately, the council has now responded to the parking complaints and quickly installed bollards to segregate the route from traffic, another image posted on social media now showing the infrastructure clear.

Upper Maudlin Street bollardsUpper Maudlin Street bollards (credit: George Holland/Facebook)
 

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
Bigtwin | 11 hours ago
0 likes

Taxis doing what they want where they want when they want: unusual...

Avatar
BikingBud | 12 hours ago
0 likes

Even Grommit has the sense not to sit in the cycle lane or on the pavement.

If car drivers  only had the common sense of Grommit.

Avatar
brooksby | 1 day ago
6 likes

I had to walk past my old stomping ground on Park Row the other day, which is the western end of this same scheme (Marlborough Street by the BRI, Lower Park Row, and Park Row). Mandatory cycle lane and double yellow lines, but no bollards. And a big white SUV parked outside the Greek pastry shop... surprise

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to brooksby | 21 hours ago
7 likes

Would a D-lock fit through the wheel?

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 1 day ago
12 likes

The next big problem to be tackled in my opinion along with pavement parking. The problem is, if I have understood correctly, that police can't enforce unless they witness a car causing an unneceesary obstruction (video evidence is not acceptable) and the council officers can only issue tickets if they witness a parking infringement (video evidence is not acceptable). In Gloucestershire the police won't even enforce driving on the pavement or in a compulsory (solid white line) cycle lane from video evidence unless the video shows that someone has been inconvenienced.

Why this should be the case is anyones guess but the likely reason is that politicians feel that sorting it out will lose them votes. It's the one area left where selfish behaviour, which potentially harms others, is acceptable to the public. Even smoking was sorted out eventually.

The whole thing is a mess and it's pedestrians, cyclists and, worse of all, wheelchair users who suffer.

Avatar
JimTheGlawsFan replied to Bungle_52 | 1 day ago
6 likes

Absolutely, had a conversation with the PC that can't do anything about it after I have loads of photos of it in Gloucester.
I'm so frustrated and I only commute that way once a week.
This guy parks on the double yellow shouldered kerb every single day.

Avatar
Simon E replied to JimTheGlawsFan | 1 day ago
3 likes

JimTheGlawsFan wrote:

This guy parks on the double yellow shouldered kerb every single day.

Just squirt some thick grease all over his side windows and door panels. If you're feeling really uncharitable you could throw some sand at the door panels as well.

Grease on the windscreen next and superglue the wipers.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to Simon E | 21 hours ago
2 likes

Using superglue anywhere on the vehicle would be considered as causing damage so that would be an offence. I don't think spreading grease over the car windows would count as an offence as it's not damage as such.

Avatar
the little onion replied to OldRidgeback | 20 hours ago
4 likes

OldRidgeback wrote:

Using superglue anywhere on the vehicle would be considered as causing damage so that would be an offence. I don't think spreading grease over the car windows would count as an offence as it's not damage as such.

 

I'm sure the whole lentil-in-the-valve deflation trick isn't technically criminal damage either.

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to OldRidgeback | 19 hours ago
6 likes

The key is not to get caught. I'm getting to the point where I have no fucking sympathy for drivers. They behave like (unironically) entitled cunts while they whinge bitterly about cyclists and the pittance that is spent on crap infrastructure for us. 

They put our lives and health in constant danger. They park where they want with no consequence. They pollute the air horribly and the chance of a bad driver actually being punished is close to 0 despite their victim complex. 

If they can't take even the slightest consideration for people walking, pushing prams, cycling or in wheelchairs then fuck em. Their car gets damaged. 

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to mctrials23 | 12 hours ago
3 likes

mctrials23 wrote:

The key is not to get caught. I'm getting to the point where I have no fucking sympathy for drivers. They behave like (unironically) entitled cunts while they whinge bitterly about cyclists and the pittance that is spent on crap infrastructure for us. 

They put our lives and health in constant danger. They park where they want with no consequence. They pollute the air horribly and the chance of a bad driver actually being punished is close to 0 despite their victim complex. 

If they can't take even the slightest consideration for people walking, pushing prams, cycling or in wheelchairs then fuck em. Their car gets damaged. 

There is CCTV in very many places in the UK. A charge of criminal damage wouldn't look good for job prospects and would also make travelling overseas difficult. But grease on the windscreen or as The Little Onion suggested, a lentil under the dustcap, wouldn't count as criminal damage. They'd still be very, very inconvenient for an inconsiderate driver.

Avatar
BikingBud replied to JimTheGlawsFan | 12 hours ago
2 likes

JimTheGlawsFan wrote:

Absolutely, had a conversation with the PC that can't do anything about it after I have loads of photos of it in Gloucester. I'm so frustrated and I only commute that way once a week. This guy parks on the double yellow shouldered kerb every single day.

Perhaps keep an eye on this:

Avatar
Bungle_52 replied to BikingBud | 9 hours ago
0 likes

BikingBud wrote:

Perhaps keep an eye on this:

Nice idea but Gloucestershire Constabulary are not interested as exemplified by this prvious NMOTD. Not only was there NFA for the close pass in bad weather with a poor road surface but no action on the lack of tax.

https://road.cc/content/news/nmotd-630-police-explain-why-punishment-pas...

In fact someone local videod the car around 6 months later and it still wasn't taxed.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Bungle_52 | 1 day ago
2 likes

Bungle_52 wrote:

Why this should be the case is anyones guess but the likely reason is that politicians feel that sorting it out will lose them votes. It's the one area left where selfish behaviour, which potentially harms others, is acceptable to the public. Even smoking was sorted out eventually.

Absolutely.  Calculus - a lot of drivers (an even greater number of vehicle-users) times (say) a tiny fraction who sometimes say "sod it, I have to drive / park here" equals a great deal of potential opposition.

And given it isn't just a tiny fraction who do this, and that many see their use of their vehicle as "existential" e.g. supporting their dependents, for work, for getting to work... that opposition will be noisy.

Whereas ... I'm guessing the death and injury thereby caused is small enough to rationalise away.  e.g. "that was just someone driving badly / they stepped out without looking".  And the numbers of people who perhaps feel they can't take certain routes because they can't trust spaces to be clear?  Also tiny.

Result - politicians pushing this are committing an "unforced error" in their opponents' eyes.

Bungle_52 wrote:

The whole thing is a mess and it's pedestrians, cyclists and, worse of all, wheelchair users who suffer.

Frustratingly we could probably avoid (most of) this if only one or two fundamental things were the other way around e.g. "you can only drive on the street / road and only park where indicated".  Other countries have demonstated this ... but "not here".

Avatar
CarlosFerreiro replied to chrisonabike | 21 hours ago
3 likes

chrisonabike wrote:

Frustratingly we could probably avoid (most of) this if only one or two fundamental things were the other way around e.g. "you can only drive on the street / road and only park where indicated".  Other countries have demonstated this ... but "not here".

20 years ago the local shopping street was relaid in cut stone slabs. To minimise the paint to go down on the nice £££ stone, there was a "park only in marked bays" traffic order, instead of yellow lines - (you can park here vs you can't park there). The sheriff refused to enforce that as it was "unclear" and so... yellow lines were added everywhere.

Nowadays there's just no enforcement at all.

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to Bungle_52 | 19 hours ago
3 likes

Sometimes cars around me get their wingmirrors smashed because people can't get past them because the inconsiderate knobs have left so little space between the fence/brambles and their car. Its a shame but accidents happen. Paint occasionally get scratched as well. Such is life. Hopefully these inconsiderate twats might think twice about it if their cars start having accidents. 

Avatar
brooksby replied to mctrials23 | 18 hours ago
7 likes

mctrials23 wrote:

Sometimes cars around me get their wingmirrors smashed because people can't get past them because the inconsiderate knobs have left so little space between the fence/brambles and their car. Its a shame but accidents happen. Paint occasionally get scratched as well. Such is life. Hopefully these inconsiderate twats might think twice about it if their cars start having accidents. 

"I'm so sorry, I seem to have knocked that mirror. … I'm sorry, I seem to have done it again.  And again."

My wife was utterly furious with me one time where I shoulder barged a van's mirror, knocking it back.  She told me I didn't need to do that - I said yeah, but I they didn't need to park up on the pavement like that: I'm just not avoiding them, rather than actively walking into them.

Avatar
GMBasix replied to brooksby | 16 hours ago
4 likes

I get all faint from time to time.

I do hope it doesn't happen when I've just got my keys out.

Avatar
BikingBud replied to Bungle_52 | 12 hours ago
5 likes

Bungle_52 wrote:

The next big problem to be tackled in my opinion along with pavement parking. The problem is, if I have understood correctly, that police can't enforce unless they witness a car causing an unneceesary obstruction (video evidence is not acceptable) and the council officers can only issue tickets if they witness a parking infringement (video evidence is not acceptable). In Gloucestershire the police won't even enforce driving on the pavement or in a compulsory (solid white line) cycle lane from video evidence unless the video shows that someone has been inconvenienced.

Why this should be the case is anyones guess but the likely reason is that politicians feel that sorting it out will lose them votes. It's the one area left where selfish behaviour, which potentially harms others, is acceptable to the public. Even smoking was sorted out eventually.

The whole thing is a mess and it's pedestrians, cyclists and, worse of all, wheelchair users who suffer.

It's on the pavement just tow the fucking thing. Charge £250 for getting it back.

Self fund it like hypothecation of speeding that saw the growth of the scamera industry.

Job jobbed 

Latest Comments