Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Roman Kreuziger to miss Vuelta after CAS rejects appeal

Tinkoff-Saxo rider had hoped to have provisional suspension imposed by UCI overturned

Tinkoff-Saxo rider Roman Kreuziger will miss the Vuelta after the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) rejected his appeal against the provisional suspension imposed on him earlier this month by the UCI as a result of the ongoing investigation into suspicious values in the Czech rider’s biological passport data.

In a press release issued this afternoon, the CAS said that its arbitration panel had heard the parties at a hearing in Lausanne this morning, with Kreuziger hoping to win the appeal so he could compete in the Vuelta and possibly the UCI Road World Championships next month.

The CAS said the panel had dismissed Kreuziger’s appeal and he “remains provisionally suspended pending a decision on his alleged anti-doping rule violation.” It added that it would publish its full award with the grounds for its decision in the coming weeks.

Kreuziger was withdrawn from Tinkoff-Saxo’s Tour de France squad at the end of June when it emerged that he faced questions over his biological passport data.

He was included in the team’s squad for the Tour de Pologne earlier this month, but on the eve of that race the UCI provisionally suspended him, prompting both the rider and his team to claim that he was being treated unfairly and that the UCI was acting outside the scope of its own rules.

Given today’s decision, which followed an expedited process given the timeframe involved, it appears the CAS arbitration panel has rejected those arguments.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

3 comments

Avatar
macleanalan macl | 10 years ago
0 likes

Yes, more info on why here:
http://cyclingtips.com.au/2014/08/anti-doping-expert-parisotto-explains-...

And this is the system that Saxo-Tinkoff had signed up to.

Avatar
Paul J | 10 years ago
0 likes

The bio-passport involves long-term monitoring of blood values, to catch allow irregularities to be caught by comparison. This is by design. It means that sometimes old doping can be caught because old blood parameters don't match more recent ones.

This is by design.

So saying "These bio-passport results are from long ago, why did they take so long to act?! Dicks!" indicates one has misunderstood what the bio-passport is meant to do.

Avatar
Simmo72 | 10 years ago
0 likes

I can't comment on the abnormal results found but I will say they were from some time ago, so why the fcuk have the uci taken so long to act? Pick up the pace, you look like dicks.

Latest Comments