Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
3 comments
Yes, more info on why here:
http://cyclingtips.com.au/2014/08/anti-doping-expert-parisotto-explains-...
And this is the system that Saxo-Tinkoff had signed up to.
The bio-passport involves long-term monitoring of blood values, to catch allow irregularities to be caught by comparison. This is by design. It means that sometimes old doping can be caught because old blood parameters don't match more recent ones.
This is by design.
So saying "These bio-passport results are from long ago, why did they take so long to act?! Dicks!" indicates one has misunderstood what the bio-passport is meant to do.
I can't comment on the abnormal results found but I will say they were from some time ago, so why the fcuk have the uci taken so long to act? Pick up the pace, you look like dicks.