Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Drunk, speeding driver who killed two cyclists loses appeal against length of sentence

Judge says Alexander Walter's actions had "devastating" effect on victims' families...

A drunk driver who killed two cyclists in February this year while speeding in a stolen car, leaving seven children fatherless, has lost his appeal to have the 10 year three month prison sentence handed down to him in April shortened, with a judge saying his actions had a "devasting" effect on the victims' families.

John Morland, aged 30, and 39-year-old Kris Jarvis, were killed on the evening of 13 February when they were hit by a black BMW car in Purley-on-Thames, Berkshire. It was being driven by Alexander Walter, who had taken the vehicle, which belonged to his partner, without her permission.

At Reading Crown Court in April, Walter pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving and other offences including aggravated vehicle-taking, driving while disqualified, and driving while uninsured.

Sitting today at the Criminal Appeal Court in London, Mr Justice Globe noted that Walter was driving at speed while trying to evade police, had twice the legal limit of alcohol in his bloodstream, and had taken cocaine during the 24 hours prior to the collision, reports Get Reading.

The judge said: “The BMW remained out of control as it went round the bend.

“He killed two people and had previous convictions for motoring offences.

“He took his partner’s car without consent and failed to stop when requested to do so by the police.

“He drove over the limit at a grossly excessive speed and lost control of the car, killing two cyclists cycling on the footpath.”

Walter’s lawyers claimed that the sentence did not take sufficient account of his guilty plea, but the judge observed that the prosecution had made an “overwhelming” case, and described the effect of his actions as “devastating.”

He added that personal statements from the families of Mr Morland and Mr Jarvis “highlight the disastrous consequences of Walter’s actions.”

Mr Jarvis’s fiancée, Tracey Fidler, attended the hearing and said: "I'm glad he didn't get what he wanted.

"It was very emotional. I had to leave the court at one stage because I was a bit of a mess.

"I've been there from the start and I just had to go but that should be the end of it now, thank god," she added.

Together with Mr Morland’s fiancée, Hayley Lindsay, Ms Fidler has launched a petition urging the government to change the law so that for example where someone is convicted of causing death by dangerous driving following an incident in which more than one person is killed, separate sentences apply for each life lost. Currently, nearly 23,000 people have signed it.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
scrumpydave | 10 years ago
0 likes

This petition is laudable but it's not the petition I would like to see. The approach to sentencing multiple deaths is a tiny part of the problem with the legalised murder that is our road laws.

Avatar
McDuff73 | 10 years ago
0 likes

he should be denied a licence for the rest of his life when he does eventually leave prison

Avatar
Simmo72 | 10 years ago
0 likes

The best we can do is to get this e-petition signed, created by the family of these victims whose lives were destroyed by this vile man. It still has a way to go but I struggle to believe there are less than another 80,000 cyclists who want to see this law changed. Please if you have not signed then please read and if you agree pledge your support, if you have already signed, please spread the word.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/67911

Avatar
leqin | 10 years ago
0 likes

Give me a gun and I would blow the fuckers brain out - what a complete and utter failure as a human being he is.

Avatar
truffy | 10 years ago
0 likes

Cannot say more than the above. Except there are some people who should never be behind the wheel of a vehicle. Since this SOB was driving while disqualified and uninsured he obviously does not consider the rules to apply to him, and therefore cannot be trusted. Ever. I don't know how, realistically, people like that can be dealt with.

Avatar
JudgeDreddful replied to truffy | 10 years ago
0 likes

Amputation of both hands and both feet would make it difficult for him to ever drive a car again.

Avatar
brooksby | 10 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Walter’s lawyers claimed that the sentence did not take sufficient account of his guilty plea,...

Seriously? He got ten years, for all of that, and he thinks that's a bit unfair. He should get time added on now for wasting the court's time.

Avatar
Cyclist27 replied to brooksby | 10 years ago
0 likes

This is the UK driver attitude - do what I want, don't bother with road laws. It's about time killer drivers were charged with manslaughter.

Avatar
Airzound | 10 years ago
0 likes

Should have got life - minimum 30 years or the death penalty which should be brought back for exceptionally nasty scum such as this. The UK is soft on sentencing of killer drivers and this one killed two people with extreme aggravating factors. He'll be out in 5 years. The roads are a very dangerous place.

As I say scum.

Avatar
jacknorell | 10 years ago
0 likes

He should have to pay the state back for the defence council fees...

Scum.

Avatar
bobinski replied to jacknorell | 10 years ago
0 likes
jacknorell wrote:

He should have to pay the state back for the defence council fees...

Scum.

he might have to...

If you are found guilty at Crown Court, you might have to repay some or all of the legal aid if you have more than £30,000 in income, savings, property and investments.

AND if the Court of Appeal thought the appeal lacked merit they could have ordered that he reserve time already served.

Avatar
jacknorell replied to bobinski | 10 years ago
0 likes
bobinski wrote:
jacknorell wrote:

He should have to pay the state back for the defence council fees...

Scum.

he might have to...

If you are found guilty at Crown Court, you might have to repay some or all of the legal aid if you have more than £30,000 in income, savings, property and investments.

AND if the Court of Appeal thought the appeal lacked merit they could have ordered that he reserve time already served.

I don't think this bottomfeeder will ever have that sort of (traceable) income again in his life, so unfortunately... technically you're right, but won't happen  2

Avatar
Das | 10 years ago
0 likes

Should have been increased!!!

Avatar
JohnMartin | 10 years ago
0 likes

A step in the right direction for once.

Latest Comments