Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Biggin Hill resident rails against ‘lycra louts’

Puts up homemade sign protesting cycling club's use of signs...

At least one Biggin Hill resident seems to have taken against ‘lycra louts’ and has gone to the trouble of putting up a sign informing local cycling clubs that they are not welcome. The person responsible feels cyclists block roads and pollute the countryside ‘with orange plastic signs’ – a reference to the route markers used in organised cycling events.

The sign was discovered by cyclist and Twitter user @trivers1985 at the top of Westerham Hill near an Indian restaurant called Shampan At The Spinning Wheel.

There is an obvious irony in putting up a sign to object to people putting up signs. Twitter user, @Binstedman, suggested to @trivers1985: “you should have taken it down to keep them happy” while @greycells commented: “the temptation to stick a more honest notice about pollution would be too great.”

Reporting on the story, the Sevenoaks Chronicle are running a poll asking: 'Do you think cycling clubs are a menace on our roads?' At the time of writing, 63 per cent of respondents had answered 'yes'.

They and the person who put up the sign will be disappointed to learn that all three routes on next year’s London Cycle Sportive will tackle Biggin Hill. With the sportive having been sold out both this year and last, hordes of ‘lycra louts’ are pretty much guaranteed. Details pertaining to signage along routes are not yet known.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

58 comments

Avatar
KirinChris | 10 years ago
0 likes

The irony of people in that area complaining about signage is that on a Sunday half of Surrey is gridlocked by people driving to and from Sunday pub lunches.

I recently did the Ride of the Falling Leaves through there - a small sportive, about 600 riders, organised by local club Dulwich Paragon.

Due to a series of mechanicals I was much later than I wanted to be and at one point going through the village of Downe it was total chaos. A long single lane road out of the village with about 50 cars and trucks trying to go in opposite directions. They might still be there for all I know.

However there was plenty of space for bicycles. A red-faced Mercedes lout started yelling at me about how I should stop because "We're all just trying to get through here".

I told him I was going through, no problem. Certainly not my problem anyway.

Come to think of it, all those pubs have signs too.

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 10 years ago
0 likes

A female friend of mine admits she detests cyclist and uses no 'road tax' and other various reasons for her dislike. What it actually boils down to is that she doesn't like to be delayed by cyclists and feels nervous around them (whilst clad in steel). There is an element of jealousy that cyclist can filter pass slow or stationary traffic.

Avatar
Bikeylikey | 10 years ago
0 likes

Idiotic tiny minded car drivers! You are not welcome here, blocking roads paid for by cycling taxpayers and polluting the air with exhaust fumes causing global warming and the end of life on earth!

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to KirinChris | 10 years ago
0 likes
abudhabiChris wrote:

The irony of people in that area complaining about signage is that on a Sunday half of Surrey is gridlocked by people driving to and from Sunday pub lunches.

I recently did the Ride of the Falling Leaves through there - a small sportive, about 600 riders, organised by local club Dulwich Paragon.

Due to a series of mechanicals I was much later than I wanted to be and at one point going through the village of Downe it was total chaos. A long single lane road out of the village with about 50 cars and trucks trying to go in opposite directions. They might still be there for all I know.

However there was plenty of space for bicycles. A red-faced Mercedes lout started yelling at me about how I should stop because "We're all just trying to get through here".

I told him I was going through, no problem. Certainly not my problem anyway.

Come to think of it, all those pubs have signs too.

And that's where this whole story is full of irony and wrong. Local complains that the area is polluted by signs, the solution is to put up more signs!  22
LynnS complains that the roads are too narrow for bikes and that she and she alone should be allowed to drive here car down her own roads.
The newspaper that brought us this story and wonderful poll is full of stories regarding the traffic gridlock of the area and not one mention of the pollution created or random useage of inverted commas. I particularly like the story about traffic chaos caused by a golfing event...  41
Bicycles freely passing stationary traffic, yet are considerd to be the reason for slowing traffic down.
And of course, the final irony of cyclists not paying "road tax" (do you see what I did there?).

Avatar
bikebot replied to CXR94Di2 | 10 years ago
0 likes
CXR94Di2 wrote:

A female friend of mine admits she detests cyclist and uses no 'road tax' and other various reasons for her dislike. What it actually boils down to is that she doesn't like to be delayed by cyclists and feels nervous around them (whilst clad in steel). There is an element of jealousy that cyclist can filter pass slow or stationary traffic.

As a friend of mine who knows a few things about psychology has explained this to me before, for some drivers their dislike is caused by their own lack of confidence (the feeling nervous). Driving safely around cyclists is something they don't know how to do, and for the simple reason that we all instinctively don't look to blame ourselves in life's disputes, irrational arguments gain weight.

The simplest solution for the driver is for the cyclist to not be there. The correct solution for both parties, is for the driver to have the training to handle the situation.

It's a reason why I've argued before that drivers should specifically be taught how to drive around slow road users (mainly cyclists) during their driving lessons, so that it becomes a familiar and practised skill. Not only will driving improve, it will probably have some impact on these stupid attitudes.

Avatar
SteppenHerring | 10 years ago
0 likes

South London Cycling Clubs. What a nuisance. It's not like they've been going for the last 130 years or anything.

Avatar
KiwiMike | 10 years ago
0 likes

Whilst the idea cyclists 'block roads' is clearly wrong, I agree with the sentiment that hundreds of day-glow signs along a route is visual pollution. Organisers should be putting them out on the morning, and removing the same day. If they aren't, local councils should remove and send the organiser a bill.

Particularly in popular areas - I have seen some major intersections with two, three or more arrows from previous events stapled or zip-tied to street furniture.

I managed to do this for my charity sportive earlier this year - three routes of 20, 40 and 60-miles, putting them out by myself on the day (4:30am start!) and 3 others helping get them back in. An hour after the last finisher crossed the line, all ***400*** course arrows were back in. Given the majority of sportives are commercial ventures they should 100% be out and in on the same day. Councils should be stipulating this for events, and not re-issuing permits if the organisers don't comply.

Simples.

Also, sportive entrants should be pressuring organisers to clean up after themselves on the day. I see no difference between a discarded pile of gel/bar wrappers and a swathe of neon arrows.

Avatar
Al__S | 10 years ago
0 likes

when the signs go up or down is a red herring. They're almost certainly not actually worried about the visual impact of the signs. They're against what the signs bring.

Though of course they're (unsurprisingly) ignorant about who puts up signs, as generally cycling clubs don't....

Avatar
dave atkinson | 10 years ago
0 likes

just do an audax  3

Avatar
mattsccm | 10 years ago
0 likes

re the comment from an organiser above.
Signs should not go up Friday/Saturday.
The former is too early and is visual pollution. Coming down on Monday is wrong. Your course closing team should strip them.
Arrows, PR notices the lot.
Yes I know it is a pain but life is a pain and local residents have an equal if not greater right to have a say.
Thing is if everyone did it properly there would be no problem.
It would give the irrational, grumpy and down right miserable no where to go. As the sportive scene has become more self indulgent and excessive it has created the rod to beat the back of all cyclists.

Avatar
Fixedwheelnut replied to mattsccm | 9 years ago
0 likes

The rules as laid down by Councils state that signs should go up no earlier than 48 hours before the event so we are within the rules, we also abide by the rules of placement so as not to interfere with pedestrians or other road users and when we remove them we remove all the fixings as well. To be honest I have always had them all down by Sunday night, this year we had three signs removed in an area that I had to re assign and a local cyclist has emailed me tonight to say he has seen them hidden behind a hedge off the route so I am picking them up tomorrow.

Don't forget it is not just route arrows but Caution Cyclist signs and Cycle event signs that all have to be placed either side of major junctions, a lot of sportives even some commercial ones skirt this one.

PS I took down several SRS Event signs that had been left up by another group as well.
Cheers
Steve

Avatar
Beaufort | 10 years ago
0 likes

The minority of 'lycra louts' spoil the goodwill for the majority. You know who you are.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Beaufort | 10 years ago
0 likes
Beaufort wrote:

The minority of 'lycra louts' spoil the goodwill for the majority. You know who you are.

You're right. And you know what, too - there are some motorists who are selfish s*ds, driving aggressively and badly.

I for one think it is terrible - can't they see that they are spoiling it for the majority, and bringing down the good name of motor vehicle drivers.  39 This "collective responsibility" thing is tosh.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 10 years ago
0 likes

92/8.
Great work.

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Whole family voted 91% now  1

Avatar
Twybaydos | 10 years ago
0 likes

This is near where obnoxious Youtube and Twitter troll Cycling Mikey lives. Anyone think that it is him putting the signs up to get a rise out of people, and to create an argument that would not otherwise be there?

Avatar
dodgy replied to Twybaydos | 10 years ago
0 likes
Twybaydos wrote:

This is near where obnoxious Youtube and Twitter troll Cycling Mikey lives. Anyone think that it is him putting the signs up to get a rise out of people, and to create an argument that would not otherwise be there?

No, I think it's just you.

Avatar
robert posts child | 10 years ago
0 likes

Local sign for local people i suppose...  39

Avatar
Bigfoz | 10 years ago
0 likes

What's the smallest possibly circuit on which a 100mile Sportive with a couple thousand people could be run that passes that house? couple thousand riders passing every 1/2 hour for the whole day should work nicely.

Avatar
tourdelound | 10 years ago
0 likes

 4 Incognito on the Chrome browser and get voting on the Chronicle web site fellow bicyclists.  19  36  35  103

Avatar
mattsccm | 10 years ago
0 likes

I have a sympathy with the arrows if, as is round here they are left up. They should be removed by the vehicle that closes the course ie just behind the last rider and most definitely with , say an hour. An organisation that cannot do that should be made to do so. Equally they should only go up the day before.
Who ever runs Wiggles events is especially bad at that.
I still feel that its just plain selfish to run several events in an area when vast parts of the UK never see one. Oh yes, the organisers care little for the locals.
I would assume that someone just doesn't like arrows and bikes. Its a free country.

Avatar
noether replied to mattsccm | 10 years ago
0 likes

Don't confuse freedom of speech with hate speech

Avatar
jova54 replied to mattsccm | 10 years ago
0 likes
mattsccm wrote:

..........I still feel that its just plain selfish to run several events in an area when vast parts of the UK never see one. Oh yes, the organisers care little for the locals......

So in the interests of fairness you'll make those who want to ride drive to other 'deprived' parts of the country. I won't even begin to calculate the additional costs in fuel, time, CO emissions etc that would produce.

People want to ride in that area because it's close to or accessible from where they live. If organisers can't get enough entries in 'deprived' areas it's because no one is interested or they're out sticking up stupid signs or putting down tacks.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 10 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
spen | 10 years ago
0 likes

A brain surgeon by the name of Lynns posted "The roads in Biggin Hill are not suited to bikes as they are very narrow and have no bike lanes." But surely that just means the roads aren't suitable for cars!

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 10 years ago
0 likes

Poor misguided LynnS, she seems to think the the article is making refernce to either her or their roads. I wonder if she'll be so enthusiastic to take ownership when it comes to filling in the pot holes and general road maintenance....
86/14  24

Avatar
Fixedwheelnut | 10 years ago
0 likes

Our club organises the Hell of the Ashdown starting & finishing in Biggin Hill, I can assure you all the signs go up Fri/Sat and come down Sun/Mon, signs in the Biggin Hill/Knockholt area are always last up and first down due to the number of stolen and turned signs in the area, approx £150 worth of signs have gone missing in the area over the last five years.
Also tin tacks in the road and a cows carcass that may or may not have been accidentally left in the road that had a rider off his bike, I know of many road rage incidents in the area, but often even a reg number is not enough due to the number of unregistered cars in the area, our own Vice President had his £2000 trek written off as a driver drove over it whilst going for him, the Police Officer said he wished he could put a big wall around Biggin Hill and call it a jail.

Avatar
neil2908 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Cycling clubs aren't the problem, sportives are, charging people to ride a mass participation club run, Hundreds of riders thinking they're racing, with no marshalling, no lead cars etc.

Avatar
Daveyraveygravey replied to neil2908 | 10 years ago
0 likes
neil2908 wrote:

Cycling clubs aren't the problem, sportives are, charging people to ride a mass participation club run, Hundreds of riders thinking they're racing, with no marshalling, no lead cars etc.

Bollocks. All the sportives I've been on have marshalls and ok some people take it too seriously but not everyone thinks they're racing

Avatar
paulrbarnard replied to Daveyraveygravey | 10 years ago
0 likes
Daveyraveygravey wrote:
neil2908 wrote:

Cycling clubs aren't the problem, sportives are, charging people to ride a mass participation club run, Hundreds of riders thinking they're racing, with no marshalling, no lead cars etc.

Bollocks. All the sportives I've been on have marshalls and ok some people take it too seriously but not everyone thinks they're racing

Quite - for me the challenge is finishing...

Pages

Latest Comments