Cyclists in York have been handed free bike lights and safety gear to make sure they comply with the law and stay safe over winter.
Police outside York St John University handed out LED lights and reflective backpack covers to those without their own last week.
Sergeant Colin Sutherland, of York Safer Neighbourhood Team, told York Press: "The nights are getting much darker now and it is really important that cyclists take their safety on the roads seriously.
"Having lights on your bike which are in good working order is essential to ensure that other road users can see
you and make sure they make allowances for you.
“We have a number of lights available which City of York Council have provided, which we are giving out to people who need them to help them stay safe. The lights we have given out so far have been greatly appreciated by the recipients and the parents of young people we have given them to."
Councillor Tracey Simpson-Laing said: "Having lights on your bike can save lives. So, we fully support this campaign.”
Oxford has a famous annual crackdown by police that targets cyclists riding without lights.
The cyclists are issued £50 fixed penalty notices for riding without lights will avoid having to pay the fine if they can produce a receipt at a police station showing that they have bought lights for their bike.
The York initiative follows on from one in Worcester where 40 cyclists were handed free high-visibility vests and rucksack covers, flashing armbands and silicone lights earlier this month.
Police officers and staff from the Safer Roads Partnership waited on the A38 at The Tything educating riders on safety measures.
Add new comment
39 comments
Do I now need a reflective backpack cover in order to comply with the law?
When did this happen?
Can we give drivers compulsory eye tests too?
Merry Christmas.
This appears to be a genuine safety based campaign, giving away things that will provide a level of increased visibility, rather than the usual fine and forget approach. If I got stopped and offered additional reflective kit and lights for free, I wouldn't hesitate for a second before accepting it.
I have no issue with the lights which are a requirement, I worry about making hiziv jackets and helmets compulsory through the back door and the resultant victim blaming.
@ Matheson SMIDSY.
I have no issue with the lights which are a requirement, I worry about making hiziv jackets and helmets compulsory through the back door and the resultant victim blaming.
@ Matheson SMIDSY. :([/quote]
I think the courts have already started down that road, I was reading some advise on the Cyclist Defence Fund website and Courts seem to routinely take into account Hi Viz and helmets (sorry for rattling that cage) etc when deciding on compensation etc
Considering that judges are already telling juries to ignore the highway code when considering verdicts! What hope is there!
https://beyondthekerb.wordpress.com/2014/02/12/futility/
Which is fine because they are not the law in that scenario. Any good lawyer should be able to argue against this and use the appropriate law to their advantage and prevent that type of stupidity from the judge prevailing.
Yawn...obvious pedant is obvious. Go and find a mirror and have an argument with yourself.
You'd be surprised with the number of people who wear a hi-vis jacket and then put a rucksack (usu dark, non-reflective) on and wonder why drivers can't see them from behind!! Hi-vis rucksack covers have got to be worth it, especially as they tend to be waterproof as well - wet kit to change in to for the office is no fun!
Great news and a positive move for all involved. Shame not all are responsible enough to buy their own and take the initiative themselves. Although there's nothing wrong with leading by example.
Pages