A review of the safety of cyclists among tram lines all over Croydon has been ordered after coroner Selena Lynch issued a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following her investigation into the 2013 death of cyclist Roger De Klerk.
Mr De Klerk was riding along Cherry Orchard Road, Croydon on November 12 2013, just before midday. He stopped at lights, then turned left into Addiscombe Road, where his wheels became caught in the tramlines, causing him to fall into the path of an oncoming bus.
The 43-year-old IT consultant had recently left publisher HarperCollins to start his own business. Originally from South Africa, he lived in Forest Hill, London.
In her report, the coroner stated four concerns, pointing out that "tramlines represent a significant danger for cyclists"; the design of the cycle lane at the junction is confusing and gives the impression that cyclists should use the pavement to cross the junction, then puts left-turning cyclists parallel with the tramlines; if cyclists mistakenly use the pavement because of that confusion, they are potentially in conflict with pedestrians; and the signage at the junction appears to suggest that the tram route is a cycle route.
Ms Lynch instructed the London Borough of Croydon to undertake "an urgent review of of the provision for cyclists on or near tramlines both at this junction and generally".
The report gave the council until December 11 to respond.
A Freedom of Information request by Croydon Cycling Campaign's Austen Cooper revealed that Croydon Head of Highways Steve Iles has asked Transport for London's design team to carry out a review of the junction and suggest options to make it safer.
Mr Cooper told the Croydon Advertiser's Tom Matthews it was "sad that Croydon Council wait for people to die and coroners to complain before action is finally taken".
He said: "We need the council to adopt a Vision Zero policy, by which road deaths are not tolerated but actively managed out.
"In 2013, more people died on Croydon's roads than were murdered. We deserve better and we can't afford the body count."
The review team will include expertise employed on TfL's cycling better junction review and central London cycle superhighway design, Mr Iles said, to provide short term options that can be quickly implemented and more extensive improvement.
Mr Iles said: "The council also appreciates that the issues for cyclists when crossing the tram tracks may exist at other locations along the tram network.
"For this reason the Council has discussed with TfL Tramlink the possible application of proprietary products which fill in the gap within the rail but to date have not found anything that is suitable for in street application and that do not have a significant risk to the operation."
Mr Cooper said that Velostrail, which fills the flange groove alongside the rails but can be pressed down by passing trams, might help.
He said: "We've been told at Croydon Council Cycle Forum of a product called Velostrail, which is said to make tram tracks safer for pedestrians, cyclists, wheelchair users, baby carriages, and inline skaters. As an added benefit it stops ice forming in the track grooves."
Trams and cyclists could co-exist, he said, as shown by cities like Amsterdam and other areas of Croydon.
"People cycle alongside or between the tram tracks in George Street and Church Street every day.
"Amsterdam is renowned for its trams and cycling – if the Dutch can crack it, so can we."
"Cracking" the way for trams and bikes to coexist in the UK is a hot topic at the moment as more cities introduce light rail and urban cycling numbers increase. After a spate of crashes in Edinburgh, cyclists are suing the city over the safety of its new tramlines.
Add new comment
2 comments
That particular stretch of tram track is a git. If you ride to the left of the left hand rail, then it veers into the kerb heading towards a stop (actually, more that the kerb juts out). If you know this then you ride between the tracks but it's still nasty.
"more people died in road accidents in Croydon than were murdered"
Must be about the oddest statistic I've seen this year...
I guess the person was taken out of context, and was saying that each murder is unacceptable and investigated- and has a clear culprit- and that the same needs to be valid for each and every RTA. I hope that's what they meant, at least.
Or maybe they want to increase the number of murders. Would take the pressure off the need for better junctions.