Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Plans to increase parking in new developments could lead to "traffic hell" in London

"How congested is my road" map shows predicted increase in traffic of up to 50% in London if plans given go-ahead...

London will face "traffic hell" if plans to increase car parking in new developments are approved, Green London Assembly Member, Darren Johnson, has said. The "minor alterations" to the London Plan were proposed by the Department for Communities and Local Government, during Eric Pickles' tenure

Darren Johnson says increasing car parking in new developments, currently under consultation, along with separate, high cost road building schemes in the capital, could see traffic increase 40-50% on some roads and demand for a car park the size of Richmond Park. 

Traffic has decreased in London over the past 15 years, partly attributed to the congestion charging zone. Website "how congested is my road" using TfL's own data, demonstrates the effects of increased traffic on each street.  

Darren Johnson said: "The Mayor's move to water down crucial limits on car parking provision in new developments is a deeply irresponsible thing to do. London faces traffic hell if the Mayor weakens these safeguards designed to prevent an over-reliance on cars which would see our communities being ruined by traffic jams and pollution.

"Londoners desperately need clean, fast ways of getting around such as new rail links, tram schemes, better bus services and proper cycle routes. But by signing off trunk road schemes and opening the door for a parking free-for-all, the Mayor is encouraging more driving which will lead to more pollution which will poison our air and eventually bring gridlock.

He says by making driving the easy option the mayor could leave a legacy of pollution and "communities blighted by tailbacks". He urges Londoners to respond to the consultation and make their views known.

Eric Pickles repeatedly called for relaxation of parking restrictions as Secretary of State for the DCLG. On 27 January 2015, the Mayor received a letter from Brandon Lewis, Minister of State for Housing and Planning [within the DCLG], which contains Pickles' trademark phrases about unfair parking fines and clogged up streets.

The GLA reports: "The letter went on to restate the Government’s view on car parking – that more spaces should be provided alongside new homes that families want and need, especially in areas of low public transport accessibility; and that even in urban areas, insufficient spaces, which may be caused by maximum parking standards among other reasons, risk a ‘vicious cycle’ of clogged up streets leaving motorists running the gauntlet of congestion, unfair fines and parking restrictions."

The amendments tabled by the DCLG include increasing capacity in outer London and taking account of car dependency where transport links are poor, in the suburbs and in areas of "family housing".

Road traffic in London fell 15% between 2001-2011 when congestion charging was introduced. Investment in cycle infrastructure is predicted to encourage further traffic reductions as more people take to two wheels.

The how congested is my road site says more car parking and road capacity generates more cars, contrasting that with effective policy in London that has seen traffic fall while the population grew by a million.

One of the supporting papers from the Mayor's Infrastructure Plan concludes a major challenge is to reduce car ownership and usage in a growing population, to avoid congestion, health and environmental problems.
It says: "Even with ‘low car’ assumptions (with per capita reductions in car usage continuing in central and inner London) car traffic is expected to rise somewhat in inner and more in outer London as the population grows, with more significant increases in particular boroughs."

However it adds: "A policy-driven shift and pressure on other modes could see an increase in walking relative to population growth, of perhaps 40-45 per cent, while the aims for cycling are to reach levels seen in cities such as Amsterdam and Copenhagen."

In March the mayor confirmed the Ultra Low Emission Zone will launch in London's congestion charging zone in 2020, which will place additional charges on vehicles which don't comply with new lower emissions standards.

The consultation is taking place on the Mayor's plans - deadline 5pm Monday 22 June. Click here.

Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.

Add new comment

18 comments

Avatar
AJ101 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Ironic then that the price of a zone 1-6 travel card went up by nearly 50% last time round for all those trying to do without a car in London.

Avatar
ironmancole | 9 years ago
0 likes

Saw a great bill board recently - Piccie of a bike and slogan read

'You are not stuck in traffic - you are traffic. Get a bike'

Really great ad (that will of course be ignored by most it is actually aimed at of course).

Personally I adore congestion, the 'I will drive everywhere and anywhere at all and any cost' types stuck on their increasingly fat arses going nowhere.

All the time those over entitled and generally grumpy sorts are sat still means the rest of society are safe. Freeing them up to return to the 40mph absent minded, must send that text/finish this spliff attitudes put everyone around them at risk.

Still, congestion is the future courtesy of dinosaurs like Mr. Pickles  24

Avatar
ron611087 | 9 years ago
0 likes

I suspect that Pickles view on the relationship between parking and congestion are probably analogous to his view on the relationship between eating and weight.

Avatar
crazy-legs | 9 years ago
0 likes

Part of it is simply that most people cannot imagine life *without* a car and, because they have a car, they've never bothered looking into alternatives like public transport, car share/hire, bikes.

So they "need" a car.

It needs a multi-faceted approach. New builds are fine but part of it needs to be the integration of cycle routes, bus routes, a car share scheme etc and the provision of local facilities (shops, leisure, schools) that mean you don't "need" a car. You'll never eliminate the need for private vehicles but if you take a step back and look at the practicalities and build in easy, well-publicised & explained alternatives, you can certainly minimise their use.

Avatar
DaveE128 | 9 years ago
0 likes

How about everyone respond to the consultation?  39

Avatar
alexb | 9 years ago
0 likes

There's a new build development not far from me. There were simply not enough spaces provided. The result? Cars parked on both sides of the road for hundreds of metres in both directions.
A perfectly good road with decent width lanes reduced from two lanes to one central corridor with selfish pricks either trying to overtake (no room) or intimidate you into jumping out of their way.

The next step will be to either add yellow lines or parking permit the whole road. So yes, it is stupid to build new developments and fail to add the necessary parking spaces - which can be built under the residential building. Developers hate it because it reduces their bottom line, but the result is to pass the chaos onto the council to deal with.

Avatar
A V Lowe replied to alexb | 9 years ago
0 likes

The problem that car parking delivers is that despite the actual levels of car use falling - typically by 6% over the past 10 years, a concentration of even more cars in a single location with a single pattern of work or other activity will unleash drivers to all of those cars at the same time, all trying to join the same motorway of radial exit routes, with a similar pattern in the morning as the car parks seize up with drivers trying to get in.

The end result is a desolation of acres of tarmac with not a moving car in sight for much of the day (and I really do mean deserted), and 2-3 hours of bedlam when the roads are gridlocked and a cry going up that we need more road capacity - why, when what you have is being used less, and being used less efficiently.

Even more insulting is that around here less than 35% of households own a car but we suffer this pollution and eyesore twice a day because there is a growing supply of car parking that invites people to drive right into the city centre, rather than catch the train or bus in to town.

Avatar
Darren Franks | 9 years ago
0 likes

As above, nobody drives in London because they WANT to. It's already traffic hell. I live in a new build that isn't allowed parking - not even on-street permits. I use public transport and my bike to go most places but I still NEED a car for many journeys that just aren't realistic by public transport. The difference is I now have to pay £120 per month to rent somebody else's parking space.

Perhaps there are some people who are able to realistically change their transport habits but for most car-owning Londoners this just becomes an extra cost to bear for what is a necessary evil.

Avatar
bikebot replied to Darren Franks | 9 years ago
0 likes
Gruffy wrote:

As above, nobody drives in London because they WANT to.

Sadly, not true at all. Take Greater London (and the story concerns London as a whole more than the inner zones), and there's still a high percentage of completely unnecessary short car journeys, and people using their cars mostly because they like their cars.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to bikebot | 9 years ago
0 likes
bikebot wrote:
Gruffy wrote:

As above, nobody drives in London because they WANT to.

Sadly, not true at all. Take Greater London (and the story concerns London as a whole more than the inner zones), and there's still a high percentage of completely unnecessary short car journeys, and people using their cars mostly because they like their cars.

True - almost no-one drives to work in central London, for example, but in the outer boroughs, the car's share is similar to the national average. If you live in suburbia then driving often makes the most sense.

Avatar
A V Lowe replied to Darren Franks | 9 years ago
0 likes

Clearly you need to do the sums again £120 per month gives you £4/day towards a taxi fare or 1 hour per day with a car club vehicle. Add in the £400-£500 per month that you won't be spending on owning a car and you'll have say £20/day to buy your car use as you need it.

You don't quite quantify the number of days in the month that you NEED a car but when you don't own one there are subtle changes that take place. You'll find that you don't NEED to drive to a supermarket or DiY store when you can get the same things - often cheaper - from a local shop, or delivered for free (if they want your business tell them you want free delivery, or you'll find someone who does)

Typically you'll end up £2000-£3000/year better off without any pay rise, you'll be driving a low emission, near new car of whatever type is needed for the journey you are making, and all the paperwork and problems are someone else's worry.

Trust me I gave up owning a car in 1976 and cannot imagine ever owning one again - plenty of choice to hire and it works out at around 25p/mile all costs covered.

Avatar
alg | 9 years ago
0 likes

I don't understand why anyone wants to drive in London; it is purgatory. I know - I gave up many years ago and it is so much worse now. I would drive out and stay out

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes

serious question, how does more parking mean more traffic? My experience, a new build housing estate with limited parking doesn't mean less cars, it just means more cars dumped all over on junctions, on pavements etc? ie Less parking actually increases congestion because of badly parked cars?

Obviously my experience isn't in London where there is a public transport system etc.

Avatar
bikebot replied to mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes
mrmo wrote:

serious question, how does more parking mean more traffic? My experience, a new build housing estate with limited parking doesn't mean less cars, it just means more cars dumped all over on junctions, on pavements etc? ie Less parking actually increases congestion because of badly parked cars?

Obviously my experience isn't in London where there is a public transport system etc.

I'm out in the suburbs of London, but even here almost every single street requires a parking permit. Generally, if you want a car in London, you need to have somewhere to keep it, or you'll be walking more than you were before you bought it!

Avatar
therevokid | 9 years ago
0 likes

good old pickles ... what a knob !

Avatar
belgravedave | 9 years ago
0 likes

The more 'traffic hell' the more people will take up cycling.

Avatar
jacknorell | 9 years ago
0 likes

How can 'insufficient' parking spaces lead to clogged streets exactly? Pickles really has had his brain pickled.

Avatar
richiewormiling | 9 years ago
0 likes

london sucks

Latest Comments