- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
8 comments
I don't get it.
Treads is going the same way, wider and wider and fatter.
Lightweight do it opposite . . . still V rim profile and 12.5mm internal!!?
Interesting why they do that, of course its gonna be aero as hell at straight headwind.
Absolutely Mungecundle; try looking at WR Compositi. Admit still a lot but gets closer to 1000g for the tubs.
Riders up to 120Kg? Just the sort to worry about saving 100g on their wheels.
Just out of interest are there any mainstream wheelwrights who offer lighter wheels specifically for the more svelte cyclist?
Thanks very much :). Those prices are just ridiculous for a set of wheels.
I spent £389 for 60 mm carbon wheels that weigh 1600g
Good for you!!!! I'm SO happy for you!!
12.5mm internally - say what!?
Someone's gotta do it so it might as well be me :
Nearly 5 grand for tyres with 12.5mm internal width that can only take 23 or 25mm tyres ?!