- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Drone in the spokes (from YouTube, © Kaito Clarke)Video: Drone causes spectacular crash at criterium in California
We've seen all kinds of things cause crashes at bike races over the years - dogs and selfie-taking spectators being just two - and now drones can be added to that list following a spectacular crash at a criterium in California.
Footage of the crash was shot by cyclist Kaito Clark, who was taking part in the Golden State Race in Sacramento.
His bar-mounted camera captured the moment the drone shattered into pieces after hitting some tree branches, part of it apparently becoming lodged in the front wheel of a fellow competitor, with the unfortunate rider catapulted over the handlebars moments later.
According to a thread on Reddit, the cyclist escaped without serious injury - although his front wheel and helmet were both destroyed in the crash, with the drone operator offering to replace them.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- mark1a 10 min 19 sec ago
Don't open at Edinburgh Fringe with that one.
- mdavidford 34 min 14 sec ago
Is that the South Downs or the Wessex Downs?
- Simon E 2 hours 6 min ago
My 1984 Record Sprint (501 frame, 6 speed, made in Nottingham) cost £180 from the LBS, which would now be £575. I expected it to be more than that...
- David9694 3 hours 50 min ago
Imagine writing such a pathetic, victim-ey article in a national newspaper.
- Oldfatgit 9 hours 26 min ago
I got something that'll beat you all .....
- chrisonabike 10 hours 10 min ago
Aggrieved motorists?...
- wtjs 12 hours 7 min ago
The fact that such self driving cars don't BMW/Audi drivers do exist is proof - as if it were needed - that Gods don't exist
- Johnny Rags 13 hours 2 min ago
Wouldn't generalisations about generations be, I don't know, "generationalisations"?
- ErnieC 14 hours 5 min ago
No chance of that ever being a human being.
- Rendel Harris 1 day 10 hours ago
No idea if Cancellara was using a motor or not, I hope not as I greatly enjoyed him as a rider, but the tech was certainly available, I can...
Add new comment
15 comments
GrahamD and dinsoaurJR: trying to work out if you think a lawyer is the wrong answer? Given the over the bars on the head nature of the incident, entirely possible for injury to have resulted in severe neck injury/paralysis. In those circumstances would suing operator have been justified? But same idiocy resulting in less damage = get to continue to be an idiot? Seems to me seeking legal advice perfectly in order, who else is going to stop this idiot?
There's something of a cultural difference between US and UK approach to tort law in that former uses private actions as a tool of policy (e.g., punitive damages resulting in higher insurance, class actions, all of which impose a tax on particular sorts of behaviour) to a much greater extent than the UK where some damage still justified as an "accident" (i.e., no one's fault).
You can clearly see the main body of the drone in his front wheel as he flips, so what baffles me is how he carried on riding so far after hitting the drone?! Was it passing through his forks?!
yeah, he seems to go quite far looking down - I guess it was clicking away in his spokes and then finally got itself wedged tight
Blimey! I've always thought that drone footage was the answer to dangerous camera motos. Apparently not!
Poor bloke. Awesome strava photo though. Untold kudos
Over here we have to abide by CAA regulations, so the drone should have been 50M away from the public road.
Two of my friends run an aerial filming company, and both have paid thousands to be fully qualified and insured, yet some rich teenager with a drone can cause a mess.
Same situation with regular cyclists versus teenager on a bike, breaking the Highway Code.
FAA has similar verbiage. There's really two things here: Was this pilot registered with FAA (either as civilian or as part of 107 for commercial use), and, why were they flying negligently. The FAA could really make an example of this person.
That said, this only further proves that having a national registry is useless. Whether the pilot was registered, or wasn't, only shows it is an ineffective tool. And if the pilot had written a license number on the drone, would it have done any good? It shattered into dozens of little pieces.
Agreed, good analogy.
Moreover, "Camera-equipped drones must not be flown within 150m of a congested area or large group of people, such as a sporting event or concert".
UAS and paramotors are a nightmare, I've been flying in the circuit pattern at 1000ft, visual with drones and paramotors with the Air Traffic Zone.
A few idiots cause a lot of problems.
your friends fly commercially so they get a commercial license. this has nothing to do with someone being stupid.
you can be stupid with a bike and it require no license.. i see stupid bikes that every single ride. stupid drones are just more of a fancy/rare thing. someone racing me a green light and hitting my wheel is just as dangerous if not more. or going through red when i'm perpendicular and green. all of them, just as stupid as the drone owner.
Perhaps my last line wasn't clear. Basically I was suggesting that experienced cyclists know not to ride on pavements, jump red lights etc, but plenty of kids just buy a bike and ride without caring.
the same thing happens with drones. Some, like my friends, fly responsibly, and even when it was just a hobby for them, they followed the CAA rules and yet there are repeated incidents where people fly them inappropriately.
If only he'd had disc brakes to slice that drone into pieces.
Replacement of helmet and wheel isn't enough to compensate for that. He should offer a few grand on top.
Nothing against drones or their use, but owners need to fork out if they mess up.
And the stereotype about DJI owners within RC community continues to flourish.
Someone was successfully prosecuted for personal injury with their drone in California (where this happened). It will be interesting to see what happens here in the future, and if FAA gets involved.
I googled DJI - they have one called the "mavic"!
what have the Roman Catholics got to do with it though?
That was dramatic, thank goodness the rider wasn't seriously injured.
Didn't take long for the Reddit thread to start talking about getting a lawyer and getting the drone operator reported.