The Royal Parks has announced that Bushy Park’s Duke’s Head Passage has been reopened to cyclists after ‘no cycling’ signs were put in April 2016. New signage states that is a pedestrian priority area and that ‘considerate behaviour is welcome’.
When cyclists were banned, the behaviour of some and ‘near misses’ with other park users were given as reasons – an explanation that was questioned by campaigners, who launched a petition.
They argued that the route had been used by cyclists for decades and a Freedom of Information request put in to the Royal Parks revealed that there had been no reported accidents involving cyclists and few complaints.
Richmond Council commissioned Sustrans to produce an independent report on the route and it concluded that the more significant conflict issues occur where 'the pathway is constrained and the visibility of people approaching is most restricted'.
Royal Parks has therefore implemented a number of recommendations to return Duke’s Head Passage to being a shared-use route.
As well as the signs advising that it is a pedestrian priority area, bushes and shrubs will be pruned and verges mown to improve visibility.
In its statement, Royal Parks said: “Although we will be re-opening the pathway for cyclists to share, it must be stressed that we continue to have concerns about the behaviour of some cyclists, and we hope that cyclists will not give us cause to re-appraise our assessment of the risks posed to pedestrians in the future.
“We mustn’t lose sight that across all the Royal Parks, wildlife and pedestrians are our priority, but we recognise there is a big juggling act to accommodate the huge range of visitors, and millions who enjoy the parks every year.
“We welcome considerate cyclists in our parks, but it is essential we manage them in a way which also considers the needs of all park users.”
Vince Cable, who was among those to back the petition against the cycling ban, proclaimed the news ‘a great campaign success’.
Add new comment
5 comments
Exactly. THeir general attitude is one of a surly teenager; "we are right but we have been forced to overturn the ban because of you whingers. If you don't play nicely we will take our ball away again". Anyway I've had more trouble with deer in that park than humans. Maybe they could be banned after dark?
The Royal Parks statement chimes exactly with their apparent attitude towards cycling. They seem disproportionately 'concerned' with the 'behaviour' (to use their words) of cyclists and not very concerned with the behaviour and congestion of motor traffic using those coveted green spaces as a daily rat run. The cycling 'quietway' through Richmond Park has been directed at various points off-road onto trail completely unsuitable for many riders, and gravel strips have been added presumably as some sort of speed taming measure because of course riders using the quietway will go too fast, although probably not as fast as motor traffic is able....
Great - we can all pop up the Duke's bushy passage quite legally now.
Fnaar, fnaar
As the old saying goes, "Take only photographs, leave only footprints" (or perhaps tyre prints in our case)