Ireland’s transport minister says he is in favour of making hi-visibility gear compulsory for cyclists – although before introducing any legislation, he would like to see people encouraged to wear it through road safety campaigns. However, cycling campaigners have said the notion of requiring riders to wear such clothing is "ludicrous."
Shane Ross, the country’s minister for transport, tourism and sport, made the comments in a written answer to Robert Troy, the transport spokesman of the opposition Fianna Fail party.
Troy had asked Ross, who sits as an independent, to set out "his plans to bring forward legislation to make it compulsory to wear a high-visibility top and reflective clothing on unlit roads after dark; and if he will make a statement on the matter."
In a written reply, Ross said: "To create a statutory obligation on the wearing of reflective clothing would entail making it a criminal offence under Road Traffic legislation for any person guilty of not wearing high visibility clothing.
"A person in breach of such a provision would fall to be issued with a fixed charge notice or summonsed to court, depending on whatever procedure would be put in place for the processing of such offences. I am of the view that despite certain obstacles, this measure is worth pursuing, if it could save even one life."
He added: "However, in the short term, I am exploring whether the wearing of high visibility clothing is better achieved by way of educational and publicity campaigns run by the Road Safety Authority (RSA) rather than by pursuing a punitive approach to the issue, particularly having regard to the large numbers of children and young people who cycle."
In February this year, when Troy previously raised the issue of making hi-viz clothing mandatory for cyclists, the CEO of the RSA, Moyagh Murdock, rejected the idea and told a parliamentary transport committee: “This is not a police state.”
Dublin Cycling Campaign spokesman Mike McKillen said that it was “ludicrous” to make cyclists wear hi-viz gear.
He told The Times: “We need to target the less-than-careful drivers who are causing all the mayhem and ruin lives.
“Asking potential victims to wear high-visibility clothing is just ludicrous and stands health and safety management principles on their head.
“It’s being pedalled as a panacea for making our roads safer. It won’t.”
Add new comment
67 comments
Forgetting the opening quotation mark whilst playing chief pedant, that's got to hurt!
Muphry's Law, innit?
The PPE argument has been had and resolved in engineering and on construction sites. Ask anybody with proper H&S responsibility where PPE should come in the list of actions.
Politicians' abilities to ignore solutions and repeatedly reinvent square wheels amaze me.
Ensuring that all pedestrians wear a bubble-wrap suit would save a lot more lives and also provide a lot of entertainment.
If it saves even one life, then it's worth inconveniencing everyone.
Even as the ability for motorists to see out of their insulated metal boxes gets worse-and-worse, thanks to changes in car design.
Helmets for motorists would save a lot more lives. Presumably that’s the next thing on the agenda.
Awesome. Simpson Bandits all round, everyone's The Stig.
Pages