Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Six in 10 back west London Cycle Superhighway during consultation - despite some bizarre objections

Tory councillors raise 'jewellery heist' fears, while bus operator says cyclists 'love bus lanes' so put those in instead...

A consultation into a proposed Cycle Superhighway in west London has generated more than 5,000 responses, with people in favour outnumbering opponents by three to two. The proposals received support from major local employers including Sky UK and Glaxo-SmithKline, while some bizarre grounds were raised in objection.

The route, CS9, is scheduled to run from Kensington Olympia to Brentford, with a later extension planned westwards to Hounslow, with Transport for London (TfL) publishing a report today into a consultation held late last year.

Part of the route passes along Chiswick High Road, where there has been vociferous opposition to the project from some local businesses and residents, as well as Conservative councillors.

Unsurprisingly, that section of the route generated a higher level of responses than any other section under consultation.

But even there 59 per cent of respondents supported the plans, with 43 per cent showing strong support, against 38 per cent who opposed them, 33 per cent strongly.

Will Norman, London’s walking and cycling commissioner, said: “It’s great news that our plans to improve walking and cycling in west London have been backed by Londoners.

“Cycle Superhighway 9 will improve safety for cyclists and make the area more attractive for pedestrians, providing real benefits to the whole community.

“I look forward to working closely with the borough councils to consider all of the responses and develop our plans further,” he added.

Among businesses supporting the route were Brentford-based GlaxoSmithKline, which called for it to be extended westwards to Heathrow Airport – an appeal also made by the airport itself – and at the eastern end to Hyde Park, where it would link with the existing East-West Cycle Superhighway.

That would require a change in attitude from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, however, which has so far resisted calls to allow segregated infrastructure for cyclists to run along Kensington High Street.

The broadcaster Sky UK, which is based in Osterley, also called for the route to run from Hyde Park to Heathrow and said it would encourage visitors and more of its staff to cycle, since it would give them somewhere safe to ride.

Among businesses opposed to the proposals were two that operate buses on behalf of TfL.

One, RATP Dev London – owned by the Parisian equivalent of TfL – said that “as cyclists love using bus lanes, a bus lane should be built from Olympia to Hounslow instead, and suggested this would keep the majority of people happy,” according to the consultation report.

The other, Red Routemaster, “claimed that Cycle Superhighways were the sole cause of slower motor traffic journeys in London, and have increased costs for fuel and driver hours,” the report said.

“They objected to schemes that benefit minority road users and claimed encouraging cycling would increase collisions.”

Much of the local opposition in Chiswick was focused on the perceived threat the two-way cycle lane would pose to the character of the high street, accompanied by claims that it would also endanger pedestrians.

They are likely to seize on certain comments contained in today’s press release from TfL as a sign that they may yet be able to have the route detoured, or at least have the proposals watered down in some way.

Ben Plowden, director of project and programme sponsorship at TfL, said: “We have to make sure that this new infrastructure works for the community and that’s why we are taking the time to fully analyse this detailed feedback.”

A trio of Tory councillors from the Turnham Green ward came up with an objection that does not seem to have been aired before in connection with planned cycling infrastructure.

They said it would “increase local crime (cycles used for snatch thefts and for planned heists from high-value retailers such as jewellers)” – although in the past couple of years it has been scooters and mopeds that have become the vehicle of choice for criminals in the capital looking to grab mobile phones from unwary users.

TfL says that it is now analysing all the responses and that it will publish its proposed action later yhis year.

Fran Graham, campaign co-ordinator at the London Cycling Campaign said: “It’s fantastic to see huge public support for Cycle Superhighway 9.

“This new route will be the first of its kind in west London, creating much-needed protected space for cycling, making it much safer and enjoyable for many more people to cycle their everyday journeys in and through the area.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

9 comments

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 6 years ago
5 likes

> "That would require a change in attitude from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, however, which has so far resisted calls to allow segregated infrastructure for cyclists to run along Kensington High Street."

 

Perhaps the neighbouring councils, those with grander ambitions, should respond to this pathetic council by blocking motor vehicle access at all roads bordering the RBK&C.  Let them drive around on their own roads, in their own little world.

Avatar
brooksby | 6 years ago
2 likes

Quote:

A trio of Tory councillors ... said it would “increase local crime (cycles used for snatch thefts and for planned heists from high-value retailers such as jewellers)”

  

(Mind you: wasn't there a case a couple of years ago where a proposed off-road cycle path was cancelled because it was going to run behind some houses along the edge of a park, and the house-owners said it would encourage burglary?)

Avatar
burtthebike replied to brooksby | 6 years ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

Quote:

A trio of Tory councillors ... said it would “increase local crime (cycles used for snatch thefts and for planned heists from high-value retailers such as jewellers)”

  

(Mind you: wasn't there a case a couple of years ago where a proposed off-road cycle path was cancelled because it was going to run behind some houses along the edge of a park, and the house-owners said it would encourage burglary?)

AFAIK, having a cycle path near your property reduces burglary rates, but don't ask me to quote the research.  And last time I stole a widescreen tv it wouldn't fit in the cargo bike.

Avatar
emishi55 | 6 years ago
2 likes

"Among businesses supporting the route were Brentford-based GlaxoSmithKline, which called for it to be extended westwards to Heathrow Airport – an appeal also made by the airport itself – and at the eastern end to Hyde Park, where it would link with the existing East-West Cycle Superhighway.

That would require a change in attitude from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, however, which has so far resisted calls to allow segregated infrastructure for cyclists to run along Kensington High Street."

 

With some help, Andrew Gilligan would have overcome the tiresome and criminal bunch of reprobates at RBK&C, who really should have no say in what TfL decide to do with roads in the capital in order improve public health and contribute to alleviating climate change.

 

There is a public health emergency beyond what was imposed by effluent being mixed with drinking water (which was not AFAIK held by respondants to a consultation).

 

On the pollution issue, Germany has just won the right to ban diesels from cities. This is the kind of action needed, hand in hand with cycling infrastructure, regardless of those who can claim their rightful part in the Grenfell disaster.  

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 6 years ago
7 likes

Red Routemaster:
The bus operator claimed that Cycle Superhighways were the sole cause of slower
motor traffic journeys in London, and have increased costs for fuel and driver hours.
They objected to schemes that benefit minority road users and claimed encouraging
cycling would increase collisions. They raised concerns that cyclists are not insured
and reported abusive behaviour by cyclists towards their buses.

It goes on in the same spirit. They come across as slightly bigoted.
 

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 6 years ago
4 likes

I have no confidence that Will Norman and the Mayor will have the backbone to ignore ridiculous minority objections. I have no confidence in Will Norman and the Mayor.

Avatar
burtthebike | 6 years ago
8 likes

Those tory councillors must be pretty desperate if the best they can come up with is that the CSH will increase crime.  Desperate, delusional petrolheads, or your average tory as they are more commonly known. 

Aren't there any cycle campaigners who live in their area who could write them a sternly worded email, explaining that they really ought to be using their position as councillors responsibly, not making stuff up because they hate cyclists?

Avatar
AfterPeak | 6 years ago
0 likes

"instrad" of posting things in a hurry try click spell checker button :p

Avatar
Toast replied to AfterPeak | 6 years ago
1 like
SpikeBike wrote:

"instrad" of posting things in a hurry try click spell checker button :p

*clicking.

Latest Comments