Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Moral maze: Lance Armstrong’s bike shop drops cycling brands owned by gun firm

Mellow Johnny's in Austin, Texas will no longer stock brands including Bell, Giro and Camelbak after Florida school shootong...

The Austin, Texas bike shop Mellow Johnny’s owned by disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong has dropped cycling brands owned by one of the biggest firearms manufacturers in the United States.

As we reported on road.cc last month, a boycott was launched by cyclists in the US of brands including Bell, Giro and Camelbak that are owned by Vista Outdoors in the wake of the Parkland, Florida mass shooting last month.

The group’s main business is making and selling firearms and ammunition, including assault rifles that are legal in a number of states.

In a statement on its website, Mellow Johnny’s Austin branch said:

Our Appeal to Vista Outdoor

Shortly after the Parkland, Florida tragedy, we made some difficult decisions and sent a letter to Vista Outdoor, the parent company of Bell Sport, Giro, Camelbak, Blackburn, and other outdoors manufacturers, with an appeal regarding their NRA relationship.

Our decision was to join others like Dick's Sporting Goods, REI, and Mountain Equipment Co-op in ceasing to carry products under the Vista umbrella.

These brands have long been staples of our business, and rightfully so. We have always enjoyed stellar relationships with our sales reps—the hard-working people on the ground—and it is not without regret and sadness that we must suspend these relationships.

We understand that all of you may not agree. We ask that you consider our position objectively, as we also respect your view and reach a compromise.

These are the views of Mellow Johnny's in Austin, Texas. They do not necessarily represent the views of any other Mellow Johnny's location.

The shop also said that it had sent a letter to Vista Outdoor at the end of February, but has not received a reply to date. Here is the text.

February 28, 2018

To the Stakeholders and Leadership of Vista Outdoor,

In light of the recent tragedy in Parkland, Florida, we cannot ignore the fact that Vista Outdoor is a longtime supporter of the NRA. While historically it has made sense to support an organization that—at one time—advocated for sport shooting, hunting, and general outdoor preservation, it has become clear that the NRA has become deaf to the public safety issue that mass casualty weapons present. We continue see these weapons used for the sole purpose of mass murder, and we continue to see inaction and staunch resistance to management of these weapons by the NRA. The NRA’s focus has become tragically single-minded in its defense of all weapons, regardless of the imbalance between usefulness and lethality.

We ask that Vista Outdoor stop funding the NRA. Supporting the organization is misdirected and outdated, and there are many other ways to advocate for outdoors initiatives—including hunting and shooting—in the modern world. Meanwhile, we admire the courage and action that fellow retailers Dick’s Sporting Goods and REI, among others, have taken toward safety and reason.

We appreciate the many noble associations you have with youth sports and shooting organizations like Boy Scouts, 4H, QDMA, mentorship programs and many others. These champion youth shooting safety, wildlife appreciation, and outdoor advocacy in a positive an impactful way that appear at odds with the NRA’s current path.

At this time, we are prepared to cease business with Vista brands Giro, Bell, Blackburn, and Camelbak, with whom we’ve spent a significant number of dollars over a decade. Although we enjoy the quality of the products and the relationship with our sales channels, we cannot in good conscience perpetuate the support of the NRA.

We look forward to hearing that Vista Outdoor takes a positive step toward public safety and withdraws NRA support.

Sincerely,

The Stakeholders and Management of Mell Johnny’s Bike Shop, Austin, Texas

Armstrong was formerly sponsored by Easton-Bell Sports, owners of the Giro cycle helmet brand.

They were among the companies to sever ties with him after he was banned from cycling for life and stripped of his seven Tour de Fance victories.

At the time, they said they "would not be continuing sponsorship of Lance Armstrong going forward."

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

38 comments

Avatar
brooksby replied to 2old2mould | 6 years ago
0 likes

2old2mould wrote:

While I applaud this decision I also can't help chuckling at the irony of Lance Armstrong taking the moral high ground. Still, well done that man.

I imagine that he's pleased that there is something (anything!) on which he's able to take the moral high ground...

Avatar
joules1975 | 6 years ago
0 likes

Armstrong was formerly sponsored by Easton-Bell Sports, owners of the Giro cycle helmet brand.

[/quote/

Once again, you need to get your facts a little bit straighter. Easton Bell Sports no longer exists. It used to own Giro, Blackburn, Easton and Bell, but Easton was merged with Raceface and Giro/Bell/Blackburn went off in opposition direction, ultimately being bought up by Vista Outdoors.

Raceface and Easton have since been bought up by Fox.

i.e. you missed some crucial but important word from the above sentance.

Armstrong was formerly sponsored by Easton-Bell Sports, the company that at the time owned the Giro cycle helmet brand.

This may seem trivial, but in all this talk of boycots, isn't it important to ensure people know who they should actually be boycotting.

Avatar
cidermart | 6 years ago
1 like

Yawn! The media whore has a new angle.

Avatar
road slapper | 6 years ago
2 likes

This is the funniest article that I have read for a long time. I'm sure that Vista Outdoor are devestated that a Junkie has pulled the plug on selling their equipment. 

At the end of the day if someone whats to buy a Camelbak etc they will just go elsewhere and buy it.

So with Road.CC applauding this decision, are you all going to bin your Bell, Giro and Camelbak products? If you are, can you send them my way.....?

Avatar
davel replied to road slapper | 6 years ago
7 likes
road slapper wrote:

This is the funniest article that I have read for a long time. I'm sure that Vista Outdoor are devestated that a Junkie has pulled the plug on selling their equipment. 

At the end of the day if someone whats to buy a Camelbak etc they will just go elsewhere and buy it.

There's much more to this than which helmet you might buy, or where you buy it from. Social media has added an interesting dimension to boycotting.

Vista's brand has taken a dump over the campaign. Within a few days of it being pushed, their share price had dropped 8%.

When your second-largest shareholder is the world's biggest asset manager, who sell their own funds packaged to meet given market trends, that 8% gets noticed.

https://amp.ft.com/content/b2b2534e-1e32-11e8-956a-43db76e69936

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to road slapper | 6 years ago
6 likes

road slapper wrote:

This is the funniest article that I have read for a long time. I'm sure that Vista Outdoor are devestated that a Junkie has pulled the plug on selling their equipment. 

At the end of the day if someone whats to buy a Camelbak etc they will just go elsewhere and buy it.

So with Road.CC applauding this decision, are you all going to bin your Bell, Giro and Camelbak products? If you are, can you send them my way.....?

 

 

Junkie?

 

I don't care about LA either way (all competitive sport is deplorable, in my view - if someone tries to get you hooked on sport, just say no!).  But that seems a wildly inaccurate term.

And where in the article is road.cc 'applauding' this decision?  Seems more like they are reporting it.  Reporting such stories is part of the point of the site, no?

Avatar
StraelGuy | 6 years ago
1 like

Mmm... that's a tough one... .

Pages

Latest Comments