According to the official spectator guide for the UCI Road Cycling World Championships next month, there will be a total ban on carrying bikes on trains in Yorkshire during next month's event.
During the 2014 Tour de France Grand Depart in Yorkshire, train operators strongly advised passengers not to travel with bikes, but the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) stopped short of imposing a blanket ban.
We enquired with ATOC's successor body, the Rail Delivery Group, as to whether there is indeed a total ban on taking a bike on a train anywhere in Yorkshire during the event, which takes place from 21-29 September, with their response being that we should check with individual operators.
A spokesman for the Rail Delivery Group told us: "In general, there is limited space for bikes on trains and while we welcome people with bikes onto services where possible, though not necessarily during peak times when trains are already busy, for major cycling events it could cause disappointment if people expect more room than there is."
All events at the championships will finish in Harrogate, and restrictions on carriage of bikes between there and the railway hubs of Leeds and York, say, is understandable.
The starting locations of a number of events are spread around the region, with the East Riding, for example, hosting the beginning of just one event - a Para-cycling race on 21 Semtember - and it seems to us strange that there may be a ban for the entire week and a half of the event on trains from, say, Beverley to Hull, well away from the action.
We are checking the situation with individual train operating companies, so look out for the full story on road.cc soon.
Add new comment
19 comments
"Total ban on bikes on trains across Yorkshire during World Championships?"
And the answer is, of course, simplicity itself. Just tack a few guard's vans onto the trains.
Total ban on bikes on trains across Yorkshire during World Championships?
I wonder what would happen if Silverstone banned access by car for the duration of the F1 championships?
They would probably ban people putting their cars on trains to get to Silverstone! Passenger trains have never been built to cope with more than a few bikes so a ban on hoards of cyclists seems reasonable to me.
May I refer you to my previous answer.
Velolife debacle: RBWM 'clarify' their position in letter sent to cycling clubs
Still seems very odd - does it matter if you're a large group but not an organised cycle club? Would a group of school kids who've just passed their Bikeability be allowed to stop there or is that an organised club meet? As a Twitterer says, what about if five people turn up, then another two who happen to know the first group but aren't in the same club?
The Netherlands apparently has 128 bikes for every Dutch person.
Ktache, you're not being a pedant. Mr Sexty has totally failed to read the texty of the Tweet, or at least interpret the picture correctly. It does make quite a difference.
Sorry to be a bit of a stat pedant, the dutch don't quite have 128 bikes per person, it's more like 1.28. Storage would be a little easier with the lower number.
128 bikes per person is serious (n+1)!
Hopefully someone will understand that joke.
Lol at that bylaw. Sounds like something Clarkson would dream up.
How about a law making it illegal to overtake on a blind bend? Oh, we've got one. Well that worked, didn't it.
Better yet make it illegal to drive on anything except a MOTOR-way between the hours of 7am and 11pm.
No doubt CPS will fold make it a careless driving case and they'll get 18 month suspended and judge stating "momentary lapse" bullshit!
And just how long would these lights remain working for, until mother needed to buy new batteries?
Well, we obviously need a law to make it illegal for the lights to stop working. Especially the battery powered ones.
Don't the Transcon leading riders all look very young...
It does seem to be a strange thing from the mother. I'm assuming she didn't buy lights for her sons bike as they were "an additional cost" and is trying to do this as some kind of penance even though the likelihood of these lights stopping it from happening is slim.
Edit: As no mention of a helmet, I'm guessing he was wearing one so this is the new thing now.
Yup, if they were wearing a helmet and were killed by a dangerous driver, it must be their fault because they didn't have lights, and if they had lights, it was their fault because they weren't wearing hi-viz etc, etc. But it's always the cyclist's fault, no matter how bad the driving by the person in the killing machine.
Says it all, really...
Advanced diffraction ?