Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Driver guilty of killing cyclist at junction that was subject of 2005 "serious accident" warning

Lawyer says there were nine separate accidents involving cyclists prior to fatal crash

Councillors were warned five years ago that “it will only be a matter of time before there is a serious accident” at a junction in Gainsborough, Lincolnshire where a 68-year-old cyclist lost his life earlier this year after being hit by a car, road.cc can reveal.

The chilling prediction, which appears in the minutes of a 2005 meeting of West Lindsey Council’s Planning Services Committee, was made in an objection to a proposed residential property development close to the junction of Northolme and North Street where pensioner Derek Vickers was killed in May.

This week, Wendy Walmsley, aged 39, pleaded guilty to causing Mr Vickers’ death through careless driving, saying that her vision had been obstructed by the A pillar on the Land Rover Freelander that she had hired.

Mrs Walmsley, who works as a nurse, hit Mr Vickers, who was riding from North Street to Morton Terrace, when she pulled out to turn right, according to a report in the Lincolnshire Echo.

Her solicitor Michael Procter, highlighted that the junction has a history of accidents involving cyclists.

"It appears that this particular junction is notorious for collisions of this type,” he said, adding: “There have been nine incidents involving cyclists previously.”

"For whatever reason, for drivers coming out of that junction there is some sort of risk factor in them not seeing people coming from the other direction,” he continued.

"Mrs Walmsley is absolutely devastated and is on antidepressants as a result of the incident."

Daniel Paulson, prosecuting, said that Mr Vickers was not wearing a helmet, although he was in fluorescent clothing, adding, “He was not going at any speed and was cycling in an appropriate manner.

"Mrs Walmsley hit Mr Vickers causing him to fall from the bike and suffer serious head injuries from which he later died."

Sentencing was adjourned until 17 December pending a report from the Probation Service. Toni Butroid, the presiding magistrate, confirmed that no driving ban would be imposed on Mrs Walmsley prior to that hearing, and that she would not be receiving a prison sentence, saying, "Custody will not come into the equation."

road.cc has attempted to contact West Lindsey Council for their comments and will continue to do so.

 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
Fish_n_Chips | 14 years ago
0 likes

I feel sorry for his friends and family.

Must be hell for the driver knowing you've killed someone.

I don't know if a helmet would have done anything but its always worth choosing to wear one anyway regardless of how useless it may be.

Avatar
markwatkin | 14 years ago
0 likes

"For whatever reason, for drivers coming out of that junction there is some sort of risk factor in them not seeing people coming from the other direction,” he droned on.

A great defence....blame the road!

Avatar
creepymonkey | 14 years ago
0 likes

For reference, this is the junction:
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Northolme+...

Street view it. I can't see what's so difficult about the junction from Northolme to North Road, if you know how to drive...

Avatar
zoxed | 14 years ago
0 likes

> It does sound as if poor road design is a major factor in this incident.

The article directs us this way at the end, however she said "that her vision had been obstructed by the A pillar on the Land Rover Freelander that she had hired."

So what: she looked, noticed she had a blind spot (as she recalls it later), so what does she do ? Move her head to see around the blind spot, or just proceed and hope for the best ?

Avatar
Paul M | 14 years ago
0 likes

I don't think he is implying anything of the kind. He understands that the burden of proof in a criminal case is - rightly - very much in the lap of the prosecution so he needs to accentuate his case.

In terms of the reformative effect of the law one would imagine that Mrs Walmsley is relatively unlikely to kill anyone else, whereas the designers, builders and approvers of this junction may well kill again. What are they going to do to reform their offending behaviour?

Avatar
miffed | 14 years ago
0 likes

This is tragic and a junction with 9 cycle related should clearly be redesigned long before this but what I find also worrying the "He was not going at any speed" part of the judgement is this implying if you cycle quickly its your own fault if you get run over?

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 14 years ago
0 likes

A tragic case. It does sound as if poor road design is a major factor in this incident. The UK's road system is unfortunately full of poorly designed sections. Accountability has to fall with the local authorities for many of the issues with minor or urban roads.

Latest Comments