The UCI and France’s national anti-doping agency, l’Agence Francaise de Lutte contre le Dopage (AFLD), have at least temporarily set aside their differences with the announcement today that they will co-operate to conduct anti-doping testing at major races including the Critérium du Dauphiné and Tour de France. The country's sports minister has described the news as reflecting progress in the battle against doping.
The two organisations have had their differences in the past, most recently earlier this season year when the AFLD declined to participate in anti-doping testing at Paris-Nice.
The agency cited “serious errors” in the past on the UCI’s part and claiming that the governing body did not provide sufficient guarantees to ensure credible testing, although discussions with the UCI were reopened a fortnight later, reports L’Equipe, after the governing body provided greater transparency.
The sports daily, owned like the Tour de France and Critérium du Dauphiné by ASO, says France’s sports minister, Valérie Fourneyron, was a prime mover behind the accord being reached.
It also quoted her as saying that the agreement “marks the first tangible progress in the fight against doping in cycling since the Armstrong affair broke.”
The UCI’s involvement will be via the Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation (CADF) that it set up in 2008 at the same time as establishing the biological passport programme.
CADF director Francesca Rossi commented: “We are delighted to continue our successful partnership with the AFLD.
“The CADF's and the AFLD’s anti-doping procedures are among the most innovative and stringent in sport.
“It was cycling, for example, that was the first sport to introduce the urinary EPO test, the homologous blood transfusion test and the biological passport.”
UCI President Pat McQuaid added: “The UCI is determined to ensure that cycling is a clean sport. As such, we are extremely happy to be partnering with the AFLD.
“Together, we will ensure that today’s young riders in the peloton are not tarnished by issues that took place years in the past.
“Cycling has a bright future and those who will define that future can be found among the current generation of riders who have chosen to prove that you can compete and win clean.”
Same on the TPT. They feel it's their right to dominate all spaces. Strictly, they should never block the path where it's wider than single-track.
As a community, we should probably abandon the category 'e-bike' because it has no legal definition and is too broad....
That's strange - usually a vociferous backlash means that quite a few people are taking offense to it and that you should think about why that is....
... have been available for many decades but were unfashionable.
This feels a bit like chopping down trees to make way for a cycle track, I can't tell what to make of it. As we've seen on this site, house owners...
surprised they didnt blame the council for not gritting the road
Cheers Andy
EDIT - I wonder if this is coming from the realisation of "we can't drive through quickly now - because of those *other drivers*"? If so is it...
I've got the 900 lumen version of the front light. Even when the cam lever is closed properly, it doesn't grip the light well. The first one let...