John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
10 comments
The article claims we have lots of road crashes at this time of year, "the highest number". Not according to the EU stats as far as I could see. I think July was the winner.
Rospa also notes that 80% of serious cycling accidents happen in daylight and most in Spring and Summer.
The Guardian pointed out a study a couple of years back about the oddly tiny link between lack of lights and cycling accidents.
The police pick up wonderful goodwill from drivers and reactionary locals for these poisonous anti-cycling campaigns (just have a look at the Evening News headlines generated to see the goodwill and the poison). This isn't good for cycling numbers and that isn't then good for safety. These campaigns are no more well-researched than a primary teacher doing a project on WW1 or whatever, and road.cc ought maybe to be more vocal in quizzing their logic.
And considering cyclists only make up a small percentage of traffic overall, will they finish once they've proportionally caught as many cyclists, or will they unfairly be disproportionate?
I'm happy to pay VED on the same basis she does. And as I believe I emit less than 100g/km CO2 it'll cost me nothing.
It seems they're not going to be specifically targeting the one offence that worries and frightens me most as a cyclist, or at least, it isn't on the list given here: dangerous overtaking. If that was policed properly - even for a few weeks a year - I would feel safer on the roads.
Word.
Although, having been witness to the rather poor driving of some police officers, I think they might struggle to recognise dangerous overtaking...
Absoultely 2nd that, I'd like to see some plain clothed police cycle up and down CS2 and nick every b******d that comes too close. They'd have their hands full after a few minutes.
If they really cared about lighting, they'd zero vat rate dynohubs
Its laughable you could down the the roads of the UK with no lights and get a £60 fine because its dangerous.... which i agree with but you hit a 3ft wide pot hole on the road and there classed as ok and not dangerous and you should have missed it ... wish the councils spent as much money on prevention as they do on conviction
Good job too.
As far as I am concerned if you are a road user you have to obey the rules.
If you don't pay the fine and take the punishment. If you don't like it, perhaps you should be using the bus, tram or train.
The above applies to drivers, motorcyclists, bus drivers, lorry drivers, coach drivers, van drivers and cyclists. Also most definitely to the clown who SMIDSY'd me on my motorbike about 3 weeks ago.
Was in London at the weekend. Far too many bikes without lights.