Filippo Ganna thought he had today’s stage seven time trial of the Giro d’Italia in the bag.
With Tadej Pogačar hitting the slopes of the final 6.6km climb to Perugia 47 seconds down on the Italian TT champion, Ganna even felt confident enough to mug for the cameras, modelling his sunglasses alongside Luke Plapp – whose own time trial effort was enough to put him the white jersey – and soaking in another time trial job well done.
And then it happened.
In an eery echo of the shock and awe Pogačar inflicted upon Primož Roglič on La Planche des Belles Filles at the 2020 Tour de France – but this time with over two weeks of the grand tour remaining – the Slovenian superstar, riding the flat well enough to keep himself within reach, was unleashed on the final climb, a pink and granata sensation of power and poise.
Halfway up Ganna realised, jokingly imploring the UAE Team Emirates man to slow down.
By the time, and it was a quick time, Pogačar reached the top, Ganna was waving his arms in exasperation and resignation, that 47 second lead turned into a 17 second deficit in the space of 6.6km by a racer riding with seemingly no limits on his magical, confounding abilities.
While Ganna’s hotseat experience was an exercise in unintentional public hubris, the rest of Pogačar’s GC rivals will be also be counting their scars, such is the degree the Slovenian laid waste to the battle for the pink jersey.
While Plapp, Ben O’Connor, Antonio Tiberi, and Dani Martinez all strengthened their own top ten positions with encouraging rides, any forlorn hopes of challenging Pogačar for pink have been all but extinguished.
A laboured Geraint Thomas, deemed by many to be the best hope for a proper GC battle come the third week, not only shipped exactly two minutes to Pogačar today, leaving him 2.46 down overall, but also lost his second spot on GC to Martinez, who now sits ten seconds ahead.
“I tried to ride within myself and when it was time to go, I just lacked a bit and couldn’t get on top of it over them kickers. It is what it is, it’s just one of those days,” a frustrated Thomas said at the finish, despite a solid overall showing from Ineos, who placed Ganna, Magnus Sheffield, Thymen Arensmen, and Thomas in second, third, fourth, and tenth, respectively.
The top ten, meanwhile, is separated by 4.44, just seven days into a Giro that will almost certainly now, barring illness or injury, be defined by one man.
“This was my first race on the TT bike since last year’s world championships,” Pogačar said at the finish, as if to strike more fear into his GC rivals ahead another individual effort on stage 14.
“There was a lot of preparation went into this, a lot of ups and downs since last year. I’m super happy that I felt good today. I started with an easier pace, as a I had to get used to the TT bike. So I paced myself to the climb, then did it full gas. I’m super happy with my day on the bike.”
I suspect anyone hoping for an open GC battle will be decidedly less happy after yet another display of Pog shock and awe.
Add new comment
55 comments
He was trapped at Halfords as a slave of bike Hutt?
A man has been jailed for causing serious injury by dangerous driving in Reading. And it was a cyclist. Something, something swallows, summer.
https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2024/may/06-0...
shock
Banning pleaded guilty to one count each of causing serious injury by dangerous driving, no insurance and fail to stop.
...
He then drove the wrong side of a keep left bollard and struck a man riding an electric bike in the opposite direction.
I wonder why he didn't consider the Helen Measures defence when travelling on the wrong side of the road that the cyclist "moved into his line of travel" apparently juries of drivers swallow that shit.
Nasty piece of work:
"Banning fled the scene immediately, leaving the victim in the road with life threatening injuries.
He was arrested on 11 December, after bring found hiding in the loft of a family member and was charged the following day.
Banning was previously been convicted of assaulting two officers in custody following his arrest for these driving offences."
TVP need someone to proof read their posts.
Multiple typing errors.
"On 28 March, Banning pleaded guilty to one count each of causing serious injury by dangerous driving, no insurance and fail to stop.
He then drove the wrong side of a keep left bollard and struck a man riding an electric bike in the opposite direction.
He was arrested on 11 December, after bring found hiding in the loft of a family member and was charged the following day.
Banning was previously been convicted of assaulting two officers in custody following his arrest for these driving offences."
So has he now retreated to The Winchester for a nice cold pint (metaphorically - I know he doesn't drink) to wait for this all to blow over?
Came across a great bit of mansplaining on how easy it is to push an ebike up one of those gutters on stairs - unknown11 in the comments
"It’s a ramp, the bike has wheels, weight does not matter, please educate yourself on physics"
https://www.tiktok.com/@ellenfromnowon/video/7364375740856519968?_r=1&_t...
I personally have pushed a 44T lorry up Harknott Pass as weight does not matter. And moment of inertia is a fiction.
I'm no physicist but I think it only holds true if you can sustain a constant force to maintain that inertia. The slightest loss of inertia and you are starting to push that weight again. I certainly couldn't maintain inertia pushing on the wrong side of the bike for me and up stairs which by nature do not allow a continous force in one direction.
The amount of force to hold something on a hill is proportional to it's mass, so if the item is heavy enough, the human body can't output enough force to even keep it from rolling back.
I'm no physicist either, but I did some at school.
Basically, the problem is equivalent to pushing a weight up an inclined plane, but with negligible friction.
From that diagram, you can see that the force directed down the plane is proportional to "m", the mass that you are pushing. That means that if it is twice as massive, you need to push twice as hard. You maty be thinking of the case when the angle of the slope (θ) is 0 i.e. flat. In that scenario, the force you are resisting is zero and then the weight becomes irrelevant, although the mass of the object is still affecting momentum, so an object twice as massive will require twice the force to accelerate it the same amount.
Gravitational potential energy has left the chat.
I'm fairly sure the force required to push a ball up a ramp was a fairly standard physics problem when I was at school.
I wonder if the person who wrote that is a vaccine avoiding, free thinking, flat earther who has "educated himself" in sCiEnCe.
I don't think you have go to those extremes. A lot of people just don't understand physics at all, hence the many comments about filtering. "Oh you want 1.5m when a car goes by you, but you are happy to go cm away when you pass them on the inside".
You're happy to walk right up to the door of a train when it's stationary, but suddenly want more room when it's passing you at 125mph
now imagine the train is not on rails but free to take a slightly different line
...and the driver is reading texts on their phone
the most common type to use the phrase "educate yourself" are "free thinkers" especially when it relates to incorrect science. But of course there was some exageration in my post. I thought exageration for comedic effect was still a thing. EVEN in this post satire world, where it is almost impossible to exagerate the failings of politicians, because it just looks like a documentary. (i.e the thick of it)
I used to know 3 or 4 flat earthers, so I didn't read it as exaggeration but simple experience.
One of them used sat nav on holiday and wanted to be a pilot !!!
Well? Have you ever looked at a map on your phone? It's flat!
Not on mine - I have 3D maps !
Like in Minority Report?
Most ebikes have walk mode which would power it up the slope easier than a normal bike. However given how steep it is, the consequence of losing balance and it toppling over, the difficulty of controlling the bike on the unnatural (in this country) left side and the fact that the 'designers' haven't left sufficient width to keep the handlebar away from the railing I'd be 'inclined' to give it a miss too.
Is this to do with the country? I would have thought most people walk a bike from its left hand side to avoid the (in my case, mucky) drivetrain.
I thought it was more pavement being on the left?
"Was this the last straw for you, Simon?"
"There've been plenty of straws!"
(you forgot to reference his run as Montgomery Scott)
Pages