As a cycling news website which reports on crime and wider road safety issues, we often have to ask ourselves a question when deciding whether or not to run a story: is the person a 'cyclist' or just somebody who happens to be using a bike at that time?
At risk of delving deep into a semantics rabbit hole, there is, it seems to us, some cases when a person may be given the 'cyclist' tag, and others when another title might be better suited.
For example, a bank robber fleeing the scene of a crime by bike wouldn't be something we'd report on...they're a bank robber not a cyclist, even if they were riding a bike.
Where am I going with this? Well, we've seen a couple examples this week on social media and other news websites...
Would "thieves riding bicycles" be better than "cyclists"? Probably. Does it even matter? I'd be interested to hear what you think...
Elsewhere this week, the Metro ran a story titled: 'Cyclist fined for using bank cards in wallet stolen by fox and dropped in street'. Admittedly your first question about that headline may be to do with something other than an erroneous noun...
Yes, Qasim Hussain was riding a bike when he found the wallet, and rode to the shops to use the card. Does that make him a 'cyclist'? I'd argue not.
If you're still reading this then you deserve some sort of award, but I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the matter. It's one we deal with every day, but writing news stories and live blogs all the time can be a bit of a wood for the trees situation...some fresh perspectives would be gratefully received...