In a Tour which has had everything so far, from the engrossing general classification battle of Tadej Pogačar and Jonas Vingegaard, Mark Cavendish winning his 35th stage, Romain Bardet in yellow in his last rodeo, Remco Evenepoel winning a time trial on his debut… I can keep going on.
But one of the best, if not the best, storyline to come out of this race has been the success of Biniam Girmay, the Intermarché-Wanty rider from Eritrea who was initially drafted in the team to support sprinter Gerben Thijssen, but has instead made the show all about him, not only becoming the first black African rider to win a Tour de France stage, but going on to win two more and grab the green jersey.
> “It’s our moment, it’s our time”: History-maker Biniam Girmay becomes first black African rider to win a Tour de France stage in chaotic sprint in Turin
Despite his crash in the final two kilometres yesterday, Biniam still has a 32-point lead over last year’s green jersey winner Jasper Philipsen, and with all sprint stages, this battle looks set to go down to the wire.
Meanwhile, back in Asmara, Eritrea’s capital, people have taken to the streets to celebrate their home hero, with cycling going higher and higher in popularity in the country
However, with Biniam still the only black cyclist in the pro peloton, fans have criticised a French documentary about the 24-year-old where the interviewer asks him a strange question, but his response is even more graceful and commendable.
“Maybe it’s a strange question, but how was your childhood?” the interviewer asks in the documentary titled C’est mon tour (‘It’s my turn’). “Did you have trouble with money? Was cycling a way to get out of…”
Biniam replies: “No, this question is bad. My family is not rich, not poor. They are alright, they have everything. Cycling is my passion, I don’t do it to get money or rich.”
Fans have criticised this question from the documentary which aired in April this year, with a Twitter account writing: “Such an insanely reductive framing of an entire continent as large as Africa, it's unreal.”
Other people pointed out the subtle racism, saying that the same question doesn’t get asked to former pro from South Africa Daryl Impey who wore the yellow jersey in 2013, or Biniam’s teammate South African teammate Louis Meintjes, or even four-time Tour winner Chris Froome, who grew up in Kenya.
However, some people also noted the reportedly poor economic conditions of Eritrea, most notably caused by global sanctions imposed by the west due to the country’s Marxist-Lenninist government which rose to power after the Eritrean War of Independence.
What do you think? Was the question justified or is this yet another case of deep-rooted racism?
Add new comment
44 comments
Exactly. Most confusing.
Yep - and the markings that the drivers get to indicate they need to give way don't look like ones they would encounter most other places (they almost look like a crossing in their own right).
And just for the fun of it, there's an extraneous bollard whacked in the middle of the cycle track for no good reason.
The whole thing's a bit of a mess really.
A cunningly disguised solid black one, no less
the give ways shoudn't be there - design mistake.
the bollard though, I suspect theres a bit of continuation of what was there before - to stop drivers using that link as a cut through, there may actually be a cycle symbol on the front face, agree its not visible from the rear though...
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5417137,-0.084552,3a,41.4y,288.39h,81.1t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sbNm5OHGeYACYBKcihtfq6w!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DbNm5OHGeYACYBKcihtfq6w%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D288.39150579650607%26pitch%3D8.900361303774787%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu
Trying to fix current UK infra is like trying to graft legs onto a veggieburger ... but (albeit it'd need legislation) the Dutch system of triangles painted on the road ("shark's teeth" - like a painted give way sign, but smaller and multiple) might be exactly the kind of "quick fix" we like in the UK? (In that it wouldn't be quick, or fix anything, but it would cost less than doing something properly).
You would not believe the amount of grief it takes to get stuff like that painted on UK roads, even when councils have a statutory duty to upkeep road markings.
If the interviewer of Girmay knew he came from a country that is well documented on having problems with poverty, why is asking a question about his upbringing so out of order. Most documentaries about someone have a part about the person's upbringing to give context and to tell the story about that persons life and how they got to where they are. If the interviewer had have asked the same question to a top english cyclist that had being brought up on an estate well known for it's poverty would anyone have batted an eyelid?
If the interviewer had done their research and discovered that the subject had grown up with a background of poverty, it might be reasonable to ask about it*. In this case, though, they just seem to have assumed, incorrectly, that it was the case, based on a massive over-generalisation. It would be more like asking a Welsh cyclist the question because there's a lot of poverty in Wales - it's just lazy.
[*Even then, the way the question was asked would be clumsy - implying that if you've been affected by poverty then your most likely motivation for anything is money.]
Aren't a lot of people assuming that the interviewer is assuming? I haven't seen the documentary so can't really comment on the delivery of the questions but from what road cc has published above, that's what they are - questions - to give the viewer context and an insight in to Girmay's upbringing. If he'd have asked him "so your from Eritrea, I guess you had a tough upbringing and you used cycling as a way of staying out of trouble, right" then I could get the beef. Fair point Girmay not wanting to discuss it as money shouldn't be a factor of anything but for people to try and tie in that the interviewer is being racist and discriminating against 'a whole continent' probably says more about them than the interviewer.
But the nature of the questions assumes that Girmay must've grown up in poverty. Even if you feel it's not racist, the interviewer is at best incredibly lazy and frankly disrespectful: if they are going to interview one of the most famous cyclists in the world one would have thought they might read one or two articles about him and find out about his background beforehand and use that information when planning their questioning.
It's not just a question - it's a question that attempts to provide its own answer. They could have just asked something more open-ended, like 'So, what inspired you to take up cycling?'. Instead they chose to focus solely on the possibility that it was a response to poverty. Why do that, if not because you're assuming (on the basis of nothing in particular) that that's the answer?
You know how it is - easier to pigeonhole a person. Black Africans are poor, white Africans are racists, Irish are a wee bit daft and the Scots have long pockets and short arms. Unfortunately how much of the world works and it's very sad to see.
Except on this occasion it's been taken out of context then amplified on Twitter then amplified some more on here.
Don't know if it's been mentioned elsewhere, but St Chris is taking part along with the BBC in a cycle to Paris to highlight sustainability and climate change:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/videos/cek9dy0v982o
https://www.indy100.com/sport/former-olympic-champion-cycling-to-paris-for-climate-change-awareness
Pages