A housing association in south Wales has come under fire from residents, after it fenced off the entrance to a woodland that was being used by children as a cycle track after the youngsters allegedly cleared it of litter.
Throughout June, the group of local kids, all around primary school age, spent their weekends clearing rubbish from Garw Wood, which runs between houses in Croesyceiliog, a suburb of Cwmbran, to create a makeshift bike park.
However, last week the Bron Afon community housing association fenced off the entrances to the ancient woodland, a decision it claimed was due to “anti-social behaviour in the area which has caused damage” – but which local parents have claimed was due to pressure from residents who had threatened and swore at the children.
“It was overgrown and full of brambles and has been for decades,” local resident Robin Willis, speaking to Nation Cymru, said of the woodland.
“And a group of local kids have gone in over the last three weekends and cleared it and made a little bike track – it’s only 200 or 300 yards.
“The area was overgrown and people have used it for a shortcut, and the boys have cleared rubbish out of there. They had four black bags of rubbish out of there and there were cans, glass, and plastic bottles.”
Mr Willis said that his children, aged nine and 10, heard the boys riding their bikes and that he was happy for them to join in.
“My boys heard them playing over the fence and they were all well-mannered boys. I got speaking to them, realised I knew their parents, and I had no problem with my boys playing with them,” he said.
The local resident also said he took a photograph of one of the black bags that the boys filled with rubbish when they were creating their homemade cycle track.
> “It will be like living next to a motorway!”: Residents oppose school’s BMX cycle track project out of fears that they’d lose their “peace” and “privacy”
However, the Bron Afon housing association has said that it has been contacted by “concerned local residents groups” who claimed that “severe damage” had been caused due to bark being removed from some mature trees.
These complaints prompted Bron Afon to install metal fences at each of the entrances to the woodland, which it says will remain close until the area is made “safe”.
The association added that it is concerned about the woodland being used for riding bikes, along with the creation of ramps.
It said that while the ramps may not “inherently harm the woodland, associated activities and lack of proper planning can lead to negative consequences”, including damage to trees, flowers, and the soil, and the disturbance of the “delicate eco system of the ancient woodland”.
It added that “increased human activity can disturb wildlife habitats, scare away animals, and disrupt natural processes”.
“We are sorry to tell you that we’ve had to fence off the entrances to Garw Wood in Croesyceiliog. This is due to anti-social behaviour in the area which has caused damage,” the association said in a social media post.
“Once we make them safe, we will let you know when everyone can enjoy Garw Woods again.”
The association also denied claims that the bike-riding children had helped clear “decades” of rubbish from the area, instead insisting that its grounds maintenance team cleared “large amounts of litter (bottle, cans, and other litter)” from Garw Wood over the past week and that there was “no evidence of any being cleared”.
“The woodland is part of a regular inspection regime carried out by Bron Afon and regular woodland management has been carried out by Bron Afon and local resident groups over the past five to 10 years to encourage natural regeneration and growth of wild flowers, especially the bluebells,” a spokesperson said.
Bron Afon’s claims that the children were causing damage has been disputed, however, by Robin’s wife Emma, who also claimed that the boys were subject to threats from residents angry at them cycling in the woodland.
“There wasn’t any damage and no anti-social behaviour,” she wrote on Facebook.
“The only harassment was coming from tenants of the flats by the woodland who were threatening the kids, swearing at them and threatening to pop their tyres!
“All the boys wanted to do was make a track to ride their bikes down, it was an absolute pleasure to hear them all having so much fun! As I said woodland areas always grow back, that’s nature for you. Those boys went home every day happy telling their parents about all the fun, and that they had they built something for them and were excited every day to go out and play!”
Add new comment
50 comments
So kids on bikes having fun are damaging to the environment but non-biodegradable rubbish isn't?
a description of "No-longer-politically-correct-term" Frankie Fraser there?
I've had them installed to keep the ramblers out of my mind palace
I’m blaming the Tour on this one…
Yeah, cos that is just eeevill!
Second point - minor point, but does Bron Afon housing association actually own that "ancient woodland" or it is just adjacent to land that they do own?
If they don't have title on the woodland then are they legally able to fence it off?
If they do have title, then how come they didn't tidy it all up and litter-pick it themselves, and took no interest in it until some kids started making use of it cos cyclists??
Its funny how the appropriate channels to make improvements off your own back are almost always impenetrable, but if someone wants to complain, contractors appear with "mental fences" faster than police attending a robbery in progress
"faster than police attending a robbery in progress"
That doesn't suggest much urgency. I thought Police don't attend robberies in progress anymore 'cos they don't have the resources etc. and it is too dangerous to attempt to apprehend criminals in the act especially in vehicles which in any case requires a level of approval that can take weeks to clear etc. so they rely on "intelligence" after the fact ie can't be bothered etc. And in any case all the officers have been "abstracted" on to other duties (pizzas) etc.
It's a crying shame that the french, in their beautiful country, with excellent social protection, have convinced themselves that they're so hard done by that a hard right populist government is the answer. Well, they may soon find out that although populists have all the answers, all their answers are wrong, and the one thing a populist government is useless at, is governing.
They could look at the last fourteen years of British "Govt" to demonstrate that.
They can have our lot after they've cleared off by 1st class post on 5th July.
I mean, their options are to continue with the status quo which they are not happy with or try and alternative. The alternative in most peoples eyes is the opposite side of the coin. Like it or not, uncontrolled and unmanaged immigration is causing problems across Europe and its only going to get worse as climate change really kicks in over the coming decades.
Unfortunately, its a very hard problem to deal with and the right wing govenment will find it equally as hard but the French will have all the other issues a right wing government cause as well.
Problems of success (and exploitation by us collectively) running up against human nature. How "rich" we feel is an extremely relative thing (eg. others we know/are told about locally). Sadly that has almost no relation to global or historic averages.
Vast simplification but for example the UK's the equivalent of a gated community. We've been very happy to import some hired help where they'd do the garden and look after grandma for peanuts then leave at the end of the day.
It's still working really well for us; the vast majority of migration is on the UK's terms (several ways).
In the immediate future lots of other places are looking less liveable (in part because we've been having it so good) while UK is predicted to remain a relatively green and pleasant land. Issue isn't going away, however we frame it.
Economic and settlement migration has existed for centures, nay millenia. The way the world exists now wouldn't have happened without it. The system of passports, visas and what is effectively a licence to move countries is a much more modern phenomenon that only really became the default within the last century or so. The freedom of movement within the EEC was seen as a way to reverse that trend through closely aligned trade routes. But in order to qualify for freedom of movement you had to be a citizen of an EEC nation (either through birth or through permanent citizenship - which takes many years to obtain). But the open trade market meant that unless a country had its own internal job market struggles, the movement was never going to be en masse, and would mostly even out between nations. What is claimed as uncontrolled and unmanaged is actually part of the refugee crisis, which falls under UN ruling, and a different complex puzzle altogether.
Which is entirely pointless, since it doesn't need to be on 'race premises' in the first place, so it seems a bit petty really.
Race premises includes any designated area in use by the race organisers. This includes the areas surrounding team hotels, starting area, the course and finishing area. Despite receiving data through sattelite, relaying it to team cars will most likely be done via radio which has a limited range. This means the van would need to follow the race convoy or at least be positioned somewhere near the finish
Well they don't seem to think so - apparently they'd not applied for it to be accredited to be part of the race in the first place.
The race organisers keep tabs on all official vehicles in case that in the event of an incident (crash, theft etc) insurances are covered and there are legal protections in place to protect the teams and organisers. As this would be an official vehicle in the vicinity of the race, it has to be covered by these measures otherwise in the event of an incident there will be serious consequences from authorities that threaten the race organisation and could bring the race and/or team into disrepute.
Secondly, the rules on rider data strictly state that personal metrics can only be viewed by the rider it belongs to, unless it is publically available. The team cannot legally access that data mid-race.
If a rider's HR and power data is made available to broadcast TV, then they could use it in real time, but all the teams could also react in real time. Most riders use GPS head units to collect and display their data, but it doesn't get "published" until after the ride - only once the complete file is uploaded to training apps used by the riders and teams does the information become public. And some keep certain metrics private.
The point is, the team don't seem to think it needs to be in the (close) vicinity of the race.
I don't think that's quite right about the data - there is some data that's only permitted to be viewed by the rider during the race, but there's other data that can be shared. If there wasn't, there'd be even less point in banning the 'control centre', since it wouldn't have anything to do anyway.
Biniam's achievement is fuly deserved, regardless of his background. Not many people in the world can say they have won a stage of the Tour. An accomplished young rider rubbing shoulders with big names, and I am hoping a few more stage wins will come his way in the future. He has had bad luck, barged out by other riders and come from too far back to challenge. But he has consistently been challenging for sprint victories at the highest level for some time. With any luck, this will push more opportunities to the best cyclists the African continent has to offer. The cycling world will be all the better for it.
Pages