Search your feelings, judge. You can’t do this. I feel the conflict with you. Let go of your hate...
I know it's not April Fools yet, but why does it feel like that already? As Dan said earlier, one normal day as a cycling journalist...
Not so long ago, in a court far, far away... It is a period of culture war. Rebel cyclists, striking with their helmet cams, have won another victory against the Motorists' Empire.
Gah! I said I'll try! Okay, with some seriousness now, District Judge Mark Hamill speaking at the Ards Magistrates Court when Joy Shannon of Inishargy Road, Kircubbin, admitted driving without due care and attention at Portaferry Road near Newtownards last year, said: "Hell hath no fury like a cyclist with a GoPro".
A prosecutor said that a cyclist equipped with lights and recording equipment said the defendant, driving an Alfa Romeo, had overtaken approaching a bend, crossing over to the opposite lane and there were two drivers approaching who had to take evasive action, according to a post shared on Facebook by Courts NI.
Shannon admitted driving and had told police she could not fully recall the incident. The defence lawyer said the defendant had acted "out of exasperation" as she had been "stuck behind a cyclist" during rush hour. When shown the footage, the defendant was "disappointed" at "how her exasperation had manifested itself in overtaking in a way that she shouldn't. She is normally a very careful driver but there was a tailback behind the cyclist".
Well, at least you can take some respite knowing that Shannon was found guilty and was given three penalty points and a £200 fine. Oh, and the rebels win at the end, so stay strong. May the force be with you.
Add new comment
60 comments
You've not been to Castleton, then.
A chippie, a vape shop, and an offy about covers it.
There are no parking restrictions on the road that goes up the side of the chipper.
www.google.com/maps/@53.592415,-2.1798215,3a,43.2y,42.87h,90.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5GdYB9u8JNbys6qPvWrvZA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
I thought National Highways only dealt with designated trunk roads ? Ie motorways and major A roads, it was local county councils (or whatever equiv in your area is managing them) that dealt with everything else.
So how will this be that transformative especially in rural areas as Adam Tranter claims?
If new major roads or all subsequent upgrade projects require associated cycle paths, we might get more worthwhile long distance infra than is provided by the notional cycle network
Ignoring the politics around building new major roads, National Highways were already funded by government to include active travel for new roads.
The scam was always they really only upgrade existing major roads, so don't fall foul on not doing anything with it
And fine if this memo of understanding between them and ATE changes that, great, I look forward to a cycle lane next to the A14.
But it still doesn't answer how this is transformative for rural areas. ?
National Highways don't deal with roads in rural areas, because they aren't major national infrastructure routes.
Generally agree, but I wonder if the importance of this is getting a foot in the door to slowly change the mindset of even "the big road builders"? Now I doubt they'll be rushing to build new Hovenrings tomorrow. But perhaps simply having "the bike people" turning up to some of your meetings might eventually modify the culture? Granted - only in conjunction with some rather striking changes in national political priorities and funding...
For "barrier" - while there might be few crying out for 10 mile sections of cycle path along the A-whatever (although sometimes there might), there will certainly be occasions where we build massive new roads BUT you could make it less of a pain in the backside for non-motorised users to cross them / avoid severing useful connections. Particularly when they lay out a "strategic" route through that countryside.
Perhaps National Highways will be compelled to consider how work on their network, whether it be maintenance or expansion, affects the local road network around it.
For example, if temporarily closing a trunk road or motorway would place a great deal more traffic on a route frequented by many people who cycle, measures must be undertaken to keep those cyclists safe.
"New report suggests flourishing town centres that perform best are not dependent on cars, with retail sales increasing by an average of 30% following active travel projects"
It's almost as if an active travel method with about 1/10th of the running costs of cars gve people extra disposable income, and not being trapped in a metal box allows people to browse and peruse with little to no inconvenience. Who knew?
"and not being trapped in a metal box"
I read that as "and not being trapped in a mental box".
I suppose both are equally valid.
This is cycling infrastructure in a nutshell unfortunately. It will put people off going somewhere if they can't park 2m away from their destination. We aren't a nation of overweight, unfit messes for no reason. There is a reason deliveroo and its like are absolutely booming. The prices are at least 50% higher than fetching the items yourself, arrive tepid a lot of the time and I know far too many people that deliveroo things from less than a mile away.
Changing the way people travel will take decades and have massive push back for much of it. Ultimately it will be a good thing because if we keep on down the road we travel now the NHS will be gone in the next 20 years and the country will be a horrible mess.
Head of hammer, meet nail.
Also, a lot of food based businesses that are struggling aren't moving to using these convenient services either so are losing out on trade that way too. Kind of ironic, really.
There is a road near me that was recently dug up for some distance by a utility company. When they finished they left mud and debris over the road for just over 2km.
I reported this to Essex highways saying it was a skid risk (especially to those on 2 wheels). It's also a breach of s148 of the 1980 highways act.
"We have now closed this enquiry and we plan no further action."
Why can't they force the utility company to make the road good?
It also means that I can't go that way as the risk of a puncture is high and it would be hazardous when wet.
Still, we've got 2p off NI.
Regulation of any utility is now a farce. 60% of the remit of water utilities is the handling and treatment of sewerage and they can't be trusted to not literally dump our raw shit without even looking at it.
Why can't they force the utility company to make the road good?
Ineffective local Authority procedures are one option. But never underestimate the amount of low level corruption via brown paper envelopes, bottles of booze and other sweeteners that goes on in that particular industry.
Maybe the people of castleton are preparing lifestyle changes - less chippy and vaping, more cycling. Or maybe trade has dropped 50% because the price of chippy has probably doubled in the past few years and people are cutting back.
To define Castleton as socioeconomically deprived and an ageing population would be quite an understatement.
The predominant lifestyle change occurring there is broadly from independent living to dead, which I suggest is having more of a steady effect on the patronage of a chippy.
to define Castleton as a village is certainly a new one for me.
When they said village I thought they were talking about the one in Derbyshire!
haha. Some nice cycle paths through there would be lovely... along with a winch up Winnat's Pass of course.
I've often thought the old, knackered road could have a small amount of money spent on it to restore cycle access. It would be pretty cheap and easy to do tbh.
In the middle of construction projects, through traffic is always affected. How some people can't see that once a project is finished you can start gathering data to see how good or bad a scheme is, is beyond me.
or even read the data that already exists.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2018/11/16/cyclists-spend-40-mo...
I have sypmathy for businesses affected by road works, and some take longer than they ought to, and I do think susbantial and lengthy works ought to come with rates relief. Complaining about it seems to be the standard approach - possibly in the hope of compensation, garner sympthy from locals who will make extra effort to support them through adversity, or to simply advertise that they are still open.
Nevertheless, some people are entirely unrealistic and don't stop to think that their house, their street, the building in which they operate all had to be built at some point, presumably causing disruption to someone else.
Then there are those who think that they've said something clever by pointing out not many cyclists are using the 50m stretch of new cycle path that is book ended by road works.
I'd be interested to know how far away this 80 new spaces are. The chip shop owner clearly thinks his customers are too lazy to walk that far, and he might be right. Perhaps lobbying for some cycle hoops by his shop would help?
If I was cycling past a good chippy with easy cycle parking I would have to try hard not to stop, that's for sure.
Like this one?
Not to be passed by lightly, despite poor bike parking.
https://www.gov.uk/apply-for-business-rate-relief
If your premises are affected by local disruption
You may get a temporary reduction in your business rates if your premises are affected by severe local disruption (like flooding, or nearby building work or roadworks).
I suspect he is. And not just about walking. Lots of people can't be bothered to think differently or laterally about lots of things. So if they can't do what they (think they) always did, they may just not bother, especially if it's not an essential activity or there's an easy alternative.
Drivers regularly park on the bit with yellow arrows because walking 20m is beyond them. They don't care about the obstruction they cause. (chippie opposite)
Ah - but that's "justing"* so totally legit!
Is there a Heisenberg Legal Uncertainty principle (in popular understanding)? So that you can break the law ("bend the rules") a little over a long period (e.g. "only a few mph between friends"), or you can tear it up completely but only for a very short time?
* "I'm just popping in to ..."
Pages