It turns out it isn’t just Luke Rowe who’s slightly miffed at being left out of the Ineos Grenadiers line-up for the upcoming Vuelta a España, which gets underway on Saturday with a team time trial around the streets of Barcelona.
> “I’ve gone all in for this Vuelta, and I didn’t make the cut”: Luke Rowe “pretty f***ing gutted” to miss out on Vuelta selection
Speaking to L'Équipe after finishing 56th in yesterday’s super short 2.3km prologue TT at the Tour of Germany, Rowe’s teammate Pavel Sivakov said that missing out on the Spanish grand tour was a “big blow”, especially after spending almost two months at altitude this summer preparing for the race, along with a further four weeks training and racing with what he assumed was the Vuelta squad.
The 26-year-old announced at the beginning of the month that, after six years with the British squad, he will be leaving to join UAE Team Emirates for 2024, one of a number of big-name riders heading out the Ineos exit door this winter, including Tao Geoghegan Hart, Ben Tulett, and Dani Martinez, while the future of promising Spaniard Carlos Rodríguez hangs in the balance.
Meanwhile, rumours continue to persist concerning a merger between the team and Soudal-Quick Step, a momentous move that, if true, would see Remco Evenepoel spearhead the new squad’s GC challenge at the grand tours, and help revitalise an outfit that has been in transition mode for a few seasons now after the heady successes of the 2010s.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
It’s perhaps fair to say that, despite GC wins at the Tour of Poland, Tour of the Alps, and the Vuelta a Burgos, the departing Sivakov hasn’t quite lived up to the admittedly lofty expectations placed upon him since turning pro with the then-Team Sky in 2019.
And this month’s Vuelta snub has only underlined, in his eyes, his status as just a “pawn” in the Ineos game.
“We will say that I had a big blow last week,” he told L'Équipe yesterday. “I was told that I was not going to do the Vuelta, it was really difficult. I spent a month and a half at altitude this summer and three weeks with the Vuelta squad. We then all went together to the Tour of Poland. It went well, very well indeed.
“Afterwards, I went straight back to altitude to prepare this Vuelta. I think I was in the best condition of my season, in my opinion I was even better than before the Giro, and then there you go...
“I got a phone call telling me it wasn’t going to happen. It was complicated. I’ve been on the team for six years, everyone knows I'm leaving, but that’s cycling.
“We’re just numbers, pawns. That’s kind of how I see it. It makes us realise that the ‘management’ sometimes has to make difficult decisions. I was shot at the time, but I have since pulled myself together. I want to take advantage of all the work that has been done this summer by trying to do something by the end of the season.”
Add new comment
90 comments
I don't know how the road.cc team have time to manage your profile and their own.
No, the inbox is not monitored. I nor KYA (as far as I know) have ever had a response
Pathetic Whims. Now there was a band that knew how to tour.
The '87 "I need help" tour lasted nearly 6 years, revisiting the same venues several times for some reason.
EDIT: they were known to edit their own material too
I think we need a new forum thread for "Detailed discussion of bands that never existed"
The Matt Berry Project 1974
(trigger warning)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxB4_uZyWAI
It reminds me a little bit of Frankenstein by the Edgar Winters Group
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8f-Qb-bwlU
I read that as the Mary Berry Project!!
Not as good as the originals - they were a bit half-baked!
Now I want to see Mary Berry in a prog rock group
Mary Berry and the Soggy Bottom Project? On the same bill as Cream, Tangerine Dream, The Strawbs and Egg.*
*Egg were a thing, Dave Stewart on keyboards
Maybe include Magnum and The Mars Volta
I remember the Soggy Bottom Boys! An early gig didn't go down well with the local politicos.
Encore by Hot Chocolate?
Or Sweet.
Or The Jam. Or Half Man Half Biscuit.
Cake for me. I will of course be doing the cakewalk.
Hyperbole, much?
More poking the tiger - what was that Terry Pratchett quote about standing on a hilltop in a thunderstorm wearing wet copper armour and shouting 'All gods are bastards'?
Was that Pratchett or was it Douglas Adams?
(edit) Google is your friend. It was indeed Sir Terry.
Probably a better one would be
Remember folks, don't feed the troll. Every time you reply to them, they go back under their bridge for a crafty wank. Possibly also a doughnut.
Capability Without Accountability split up in the late '80s when their guitarist "Fast" DJ Chadders was accidentally killed in a bizarre crown green bowling accident. Do keep up.
(I know I'm replying to the wrong comment but I'm trying to play by the rules here).
That's where Crown Green Bowling Accident got their name from. They started out as a tribute act but as the drink and drugs took over they forgot who they were a tribute to.
A tragic but common story. Oasis lost touch with their florist's shop roots as soon as they hit the big time, tried to regain it with "what's the story, morning glory" but soon the best they could hope for was an allotment.
The allotment was the beginning of the end, and the many problems were compounded when one of the two brothers left the band just before they were about to go on stage after an argument about who had the biggest marrow.
I liked their greatest hits album "open, pour and be yourself once more!"
"Drivers face tougher sentences for killing pedestrians"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-66593086
Not objecting to that, but I'd also like to see much longer revocations of driving licenses.
I'd like to see any Dangerous Driving conviction trigger an automatic lifetime ban
Drivers should face more serious punishment for all serious driving offences and the fact someone is a vulnerable road user shouldn't really factor into it.
All the laws around cars suggest that its perfectly normal and reasonable to drive intentionally badly as long as you aren't unlucky and hurt someone. The number of times drivers pass me on blind corners is ridiculous. They are gambling like all the other awful and willfully dangerous drivers out there.
Perhaps if we were more proactive about stopping bad driving we wouldn't have to worry quite as much about how harsh the punishment should be when shock shock horror, they aren't lucky and they hurt or kill someone.
Boils my blood when people are treated with massive leniency because they "are of good character and its their first offence". No they aren't and no it wasn't. Its not my first murder if I have committed 10 and got away with the first 9. People who have accidents from bad driving have been bad drivers for a long time. They just ran out of luck.
Agree with your whole post but this struck a chord. The number of times I'm passed in an unsafe way is unbelievable. I see drivers constantly passing cyclists in a way that, were I driving, I simply would not. Seems like there's a large percentage of drivers that do not know how to pass a cyclist and probably do not actually care. If they screw up I want them to be punished.
Another agreeing with Mr 23 - although not really with the revenge-style punishments often demanded here with a wave of the pitchfork or burning brand.
Prevention is far, far better than cure. It's of little recompense to one maimed or murdered if Mr or Ms Carloon is sent to be beaten, raped and otherwise utterly degraded in prison. The brief joy at such a sentence amongst the bereaved is generally very short lived, as the grief returns once more.
Best prevention would be to deal with the fundamental causes so as to stop the murdering & maiming in the first place.
The first and foremost method could be to radically change the nature of car and road designs, which should not provide opportunities, nay exhortations (aka adverts) to drive madly at silly speeds and without attention. There are also many technologies now available that could prevent carloons from looning in these ways.
The next preventative, as you both mention, is to prevent actually and potentially murderous offenders from having further opportunities to carloon about. Permanent driving bans for 'em; similar penalties on any suppliers (those who sell or lend a car to a banned carloon). And heavy enforcement of these penalties.
Stuffing carloons into prisons for an absolute degradation and the inculcation of their consequent huge disaffection & resentment, not to mention more criminal techniques taught them by other denizens of the places - that's no prevention if carloons know that only 1 in 100 of them may be caught, especially if they can also afford that Loophole or similar. It also costs we taxpayers the proverbial bomb.
No need to worry: the comprehensive review of road laws will be along any minute. This government wouldn't lie to us would they?
Pages