For any of you eagle-eyed Dorkingphiles out there, yes that's the old route, no we don't have any pictures from the new route...yet...
Some of your RideLondon thoughts...
SimoninSpalding said: "I don't believe in the outdated notion of a class structure, but obviously an event like RideLondon is going to be predominantly for people with a reasonably comfortable income and lifestyle. Households relying on food banks to feed their kids and not having money for the electricity bill will not be dropping £100 to enter, regardless of their levels of fitness etc.
"Equally, the route I am guessing stuck to the more leafy parts of Essex, I doubt the more industrial/ less affluent areas along the Thames featured too highly.
"I do agree that in my experience (several years ago now) the FreeCycle event was a joy to behold and a vision of how great central London could be if more effort was made for active travel.
"At the end of the day, RideLondon does no real harm and the sums raised for charity by the participants should not be overlooked."
Smoggysteve added: "This country is never ever going to move forward with its healthcare targets if all it cares about is cars and drivers. Congestion in our cities, poor air quality and then when people try to live a better lifestlye and get out and exercise they are lambasted for it. RideLondon might be a middle-class lycrathon but its still a day of minimal car use and people doing something healthy. If you find that offensive then you're a total moron."
racyrich commented: "I thought only poor people who couldn't afford a car rode bikes. Now it's only the middle class. I can't keep up."
Steve K thinks: "Anything that gets people on bikes is a good thing, because then they remember how much fun it is to ride a bike, and may consider doing it more often. Plus seeing London car-free might encourage people to realise that if we stop car dominance, cities become much nicer places."
I'd say that's a nice place to stop...