It looks like it’s a day for divisive internet polls, then.
Because, in direct contravention of the Highway Code, ITV’s ever insightful Good Morning Britain took to X/Twitter early this morning to ask viewers, “Is it drivers’ responsibility to keep cyclists safe on the roads?”
Yep, two years on from the updated Highway Code being published, we’re still being treated to national television programmes coming up with nonsense like this.
> Changes to the Highway Code mean very little if they are not known or followed by motorists
That head scratching poll, and its accompanying segment on the show, was made in response to live blog stalwart and pedalling presenter Jeremy Vine’s backing of an AA campaign, which has just reached its 10th anniversary, to encourage motorists to place “Think Bike” stickers on their wing mirrors to remind them to keep an eye out for people on bikes – after a survey of 12,700 AA members found that 89 per cent agreed with the statement ‘it’s sometimes hard to see cyclists’.
> AA "Think Bikes" awareness campaign admits drivers don't look, suggests wing mirror stickers will remind them
“I’m so pleased to see that the AA is doing this because, if you’re on two wheels, you do feel quite vulnerable,” Vine said.
“And I always think when you’re in a car – I drive too – you don’t always see that that person on the bicycle is a mum, a sister, somebody’s son, someone’s grandfather, maybe even their great-grandfather.”
So, what did GMB do in response to Vine and the AA’s safety-focused recommendations? Launch a Twitter poll, that’s what:
So far, rather unsurprisingly for social media, the Highway Code vulnerability hierarchy-backed option ‘Yes’ is taking a thumping, with over 70 per cent opting for ‘No’.
And some of the responses are as equally unsurprising.
“Everyone has a responsibility!” says Craig. “Cyclists can be just as bad as anyone else in a motor vehicle.”
“If we put a sticker on the mirrors that would impede our vision even more by blocking part of the mirror itself,” Stebe said.
“Can cyclists put a sticker somewhere to remind them what a red light means!!!” exclamation mark-loving Sean the Cabbie wrote.
“It’s everyone responsibility to keep themselves safe,” added Chris. “Cyclists should stick to cycle lanes, and adhere to the rules of the road like cars and follow traffic lights. Likewise cars should not be in cycle lanes or park in them etc. Everyone has a role to play in road safety.”
While John popped up with some anti-cycling bingo classics: “Put the sticker next to the cyclist’s tax, insurance, and registration.”
“Let’s start by getting cyclists to get regular eye checks so they recognise and understand what a red traffic light actually means,” Sally added, securing a full house.
Sigh…
However, not everyone was falling for the GMB social media intern’s trap.
“This isn’t up for debate, it’s in the Highway Code. 72 per cent of the voters are wrong,” noted Marc, while Sam wrote: “Anyone who chose ‘no’ has failed their driving test”.
“The fact that drivers need to be reminded to look out for vulnerable road users tells us everything we need to know about the standard of driving in this country,” added Tom.
Well, all that internet polling ultimately led to a short segment at the very tail end of GMB’s schedule, featuring Stop Killing Cyclists co-founder Donnachadh McCarthy and Manchester taxi driver John Consterdine.
“It’s down to all road users to use the roads safely and sanely,” McCarthy said. “However, it is only drivers who have the power to kill other road users, so the responsibility lies with the driver.
“And something like 70 per cent of drivers close pass, 50 per cent of drivers break the speed limit, and 30 per cent of drivers use mobile phones. I saw two Land Rover drivers on Sunday swanning down a lane on their mobiles. They should be looking for cyclists and the road, not their phones.”
“I agree with Donnachadh to a certain extent,” replied John. “But we should have legislation that if drivers have to drive safely, cyclists should also obey the rules of the road.
“If I hit a cyclist, there’s going to be a serious accident. But if a cyclist hits me, then he just cycles away and I’m left with a damaged vehicle.”
Hmmm… Don’t worry, it gets worse.
“Shouldn’t there be training for cyclists? Or a sticker that says ‘Beware, I’m going to do something crazy’.”
> The Highway Code for cyclists — all the rules you need to know for riding on the road explained
Presenter Kate Garraway, seemingly oblivious to the Highway Code, then jumped in by saying she sees a lot of cyclists “wafting across lanes and going through red lights” in London, and questioned why there was no pressure on cyclists to act safely.
“This red light canard needs to be put to bed,” interjected McCarthy. “99 per cent of people who get killed by people breaking red lights are killed by drivers breaking the red light.
“In Holland, 70 per cent of kids cycle to school and they do it safely. It’s two per cent in Britain. We’re way behind Europe.”
And finally, Labour politician-turned-dancing enthusiast Ed Balls got involved, asking whether cycle lanes and cycling infrastructure makes it safer for motorists, before John threw in a few more chestnuts about pavement riding and e-bike speeds, and Kate asked, rather remarkably, “Is that the answer? Some kind of enforced Highway Code, like a driving test, insurance and responsibility, for cyclists?”
Now, imagine that, actually reading the Highway Code…
Add new comment
84 comments
When did "Think Bike" become about pushbikes?
Was there always this hyped bollocks when it was about motorbikes?
GMB have airtime to fill, just as live blogs need to be sometimes, with stuff the promotes alot of needless debate.
In anycase the real story is the AA sticker, not the twitter poll, and Im not sure how useful a sticker, that obscures part of what a driver can see in a mirror, really is.
especially as by the time it prompts a driver, when theyve checked their mirrors (yeah right) as a cyclist youll already be well within their danger zone
I think you're forgetting someone.
It's a tight field.
And what about this one?
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/09/david-cameron-donald-tr...
At least Gordon Brown had that Stranglers' song about him
(I prefer the Dave Brubeck Quartet original https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Qs1J612nZs)
Sunak does look very statesmanlike in that getup though. Which just goes to show, no matter how useless you are, people will still take you seriously if you dress the part.
I came here for the wing mirror story.
Anyone?
no?
OK then. Door mirror.
C'mon, it's DOOR MIRROR.
Name of thing must be same as description of thing. Me not cope with name that is representative of thing but not directly descriptive. Name confusing and make sad.
DOOR MIRROR!!
Misnomers are so common there is even a word for them. Now where is my pet koala bear?
Yes I know. The reference was to a common refrain from a former member of this parish. I couldn't give a fig what you call them.
Do those stickers show where you might expect to see cyclists who are airborne after having been hit by cars?
Not that long ago it was considered a fairly working-class sport. Riders turned pro because they felt it offered better prospects than working as a farm labourer or miner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Kelly_(cyclist)
I read a story over the weekend about running shoes that cost upwards of £400 and could be used only once. But they knocked 4% off your marathon time.
I'm glad they weren't available in my day because the shoes could (theoretically) have reduced my best marathon time to tantalisingly close to sub 3 hours, but doubt my wife would approve the expense.
Perhaps they were available back in your day - were they these ones?
Would you have felt satisfied though, knowing your performance improvement was only due to the fancy shoes?
Isn't that the whole point of most cycling tech though? It seems to be the same position as aero bikes, long socks, etc. I am guessing that it's all arms race stuff and unless everyone wears school plimsolls then it's inevitable (for the record, I'd like to see Pogacar v the rest on steel bikes from 1979)
There is a difference between the two sports though, in that running doesn't require any "tech" at all, whereas cycling does by definition. I can't actually see what would be lost if everyone did wear something like plimsolls (except for the manufacturers' profits, maybe). Agree about the 1979 bikes.
Steel bikes from 1979 (pictured - 1980)? I reckon they'd maybe be the same speed or even faster on the flat...
Until that front valve gets ripped off under hard braking.
...or - if allowing "pro bikes" from 1979, definitely faster!
Good luck crashing that thing at 65 mph.
People will do an all kinds of things for greater speed.
I'd prefer something a bit more relaxed and practical myself.
Bet it gets hot in there though. And bunnyhopping over potholes and the like is probably tricky.
Hmm... OK, well bigger wheels should be smoother-rolling, perhaps a single-person one of these? OTOH the aero penalty from the wheel becomes significant.
Pages