A couple who decided to make a small DIY parking space for their cargo bike outside their home in Bristol have been asked by the council to either remove it themselves or have it removed by the council. The couple have lodged a complaint against Bristol City Council, pointing out that other residents parks their cars in front of homes too.
Anna and Mark Cordle recently gave up their car and switched to riding a cargo bike. Since they couldn’t store it inside their home, they said that they had no option but to store it where they used to park their car — on the road outside their home.
So, they placed two large green containers filled with soil and plants, which was heavy enough to be able to secure their bike to, and sturdy enough to withstand any bumps from nearby parked cars.
Before doing this, they had asked people in their street and two neighbouring streets to see if anyone minded. They said said there was unanimous backing, and they had even consulted with one of their local councillors.
> “Is there anything that can’t be blamed on cyclists?” Baby hospitalised after motorist crashes into bike hangar – and locals blame the hangar
However, Bristol Live reports that the council has sent the couple a letter informing them that enforcement action would be taken against them if they don’t remove the heavy planters from their road in Redfield.
The letter read: “Your placing of the planters on the highway is in breach of Section 149 of the Highways Act. Please remove the planters urgently and ensure that they are not replaced on the highway at any time. You may also wish to consider that if any person has an accident has a result of your planters being on the highway, it will be you who will be liable for meeting any compensation claim.”
The letter then added that the council had the power to remove the planters if the Cordles didn’t.
However, the couple have said that they are not going to remove the planters, and in return have lodged a formal complaint against the council.
> “A flagrant act of vandalism”: Council agrees to move “ugly” bike rack after churchgoers say it will “block access for hearses”
Anna Cordle said: “We explored all the options for how we could store it securely - but we live in a terrace, with no front garden to speak of. The only option for us was to park the bike - our car replacement - where we used to park the car, on the road.
“For security and insurance, we needed to get something heavy and secure to lock it to, so we placed bike planters in the road to lock the bike to.”
She added: “We sought out ways we could seek permission for what we were doing - but there were none. We consulted with our neighbours, those who would have most claim to be affected, and received a positive response, so went ahead. It has been transformative to our ability to get around without adding to Bristol’s poor air quality and carbon emissions.”
“After more than a year of them being in the road with nothing but positive responses, the council are now siding with anonymous complaints that the planters are an obstruction/danger on the highway and have sent us a letter telling us to remove them and threatening further enforcement action.
“Without them, we would have no way of storing our cargo bike without causing far greater obstruction to the pavement (locking it to lampposts or in front of our house). We would probably need to get a car,” she added.
The Cordles mentioned that their situation highlights how the law, and the council’s interpretation of it, favours car ownership over people who cycle.
Mark Cordle said: “We are saying no, we will not remove them. They do not obstruct free passage on the highway, and we deny that they are any more a danger than other street infrastructure. We want them to stay.
“Our street wants them to stay. It’s better for all of the council’s objectives, for all of Bristol's residents, for the climate and for air quality, that it stays.”
> Bike sheds are detrimental to Victorian homes, but guess what's not?
The couple have submitted a formal complaint against the council in a bid to try to get the issue looked at in more detail, and they acknowledge that they do not own that space and can’t commandeer it for their sole use.
“We don’t like the disparity of it, and wish our neighbours could also reliably park near their homes,” said Anna Cordle. “But it is the council’s role, not ours, to facilitate that.”
She continued: “We of course don’t claim to own the road, and would be very content with council-provided infrastructure on the street - but that is not coming any time soon. It wouldn’t have to be outside our house, but it wouldn’t have made sense for us to put it in front of somebody else’s house on the street.
“Nobody owns the road, but also everybody does - not just car users. Saying cargo bike parking infrastructure needs to be dismantled to provide another space for a car to park would be telling us we can’t share this public asset if we don’t own a car.”
The reaction on social media has been divided, with cyclists questioning the legality of such an action, but some also wondering if this calls for a change in the outlook of how we perceive and use roads.
Meanwhile, Bristol Cycling wrote: “The failure to provide any infrastructure for storing bikes in this city should be a cause of major embarrassment - why emphasise it? This council has decided not to develop any processes for storing anything other than a car.”
What do you think? Are DIY cargo bike parking spaces safe and if yes, should they be legal? If not, what are the alternatives?
Add new comment
81 comments
Looking at the area on street view, the front yard should be big enough to fit the bike, if reversed in. Albeit you'd need the strength to lift the backend over the wall. A few houses have large motorbikes placed there already, and they could also have something fitted to lock it to.
Wasn't discriminatory bike parking that required physical strength to use covered by road.cc recently?
How is that pertinent to this matter? They are allowed to leave their bike parked on a public road..
Thought this would work well. Sadly you need a skip licence (£20-£50pw) & it would probably be full of rubbish by the time you get home every day.
Large 1500L x 750Wmm platform.
applying for a cargo bike rack outside your home should be easier than applying for a dropped kerb for your private driveway.
a private driveway takes away space from the public and gives it to the resident but a cargo bike rack can be used by the public.
Anything left on the road permanantly can be classed as an obstruction so no you cannot leave a car parked indefinetly.
Also using a van means having to tax and insure it, better option is a braked horse box, you would have to move it back/forward and/or to opposite side every now and again so as not to be classed as an obstruction, but it does not need to be taxed/insured.
I think there should be a way ahead here. Bike hangars can be used for cargo bikes if appropriate (I have seen an example of use by a trike for a person with a disability - they got half the hangar and the relevant upwrong racks were removed).
Bristol had a huge programme of proposed bike hangars, which was scuppered by cancelled Govt funding, and their first bike hangar was installed in 2015 working with a community group.
Perhaps something like:
1 - Install in a pair since they take up half a parking space each.
2 - Make sure rental generates more revenue than a CPZ parking space license for a car.
3 - Make it automatic if requesters can demonstrate that required on street car parking will be reduced by 2 cars or more.
Capital funding - what about the Society of Merchant Venturers. As it is Bristol !
They pretty much shot their argument in the foot with this sentence alone.
And then there is this here...
Technically speaking the land, public roads/walkways - space outside your home providing its not your own driveway attached to your house belong to to the respective council or the government of the town/county that you reside in.
You pay for the right/privilege to use their roads or park outside your house on the street but the land/road does not belong to you.
By placing heavy planters there, that becomes your dedicated parking spot and nobody else can use it unless youre going to lift it up and place it back in your front yard then back again every time you use the cargo bike.
Local councils are often quite lazy and useless and you normally wont hear a single word out of them unless youre late with your payments or owe them money but taking the law in your own hands like this (teehee!) isnt the best step forward no matter how many times it feels like youre banging your head against a wall.
I wish them luck but their complaint is going in the recycle bin. if worst came to worst. They should have reached out to their local MP and see if they could get them to wade in on the matter, afterall its their job to serve their constituents
Other cyclists can use the planters when they're not there. Even when they are there someone can use the planter that's right up against the kerb. They've just turned a car parking space in to a cycle parking space.
This is the council's fault for not being proactive on cycling like their climate emergency action plan claims that they are.
I take the point that people can't just "claim" the road for themselves, but this is an advantage drivers have over cargo bike owners. You can't just lock a cargo bike to itself and expect it to not get stolen like you can a motor vehicle. If the council wants to resolve this in a way that will save face they need to get some sort of system set up to apply for on-road cycle storage. Failing that, as others have said, spite van is the way forward. Given that most of the neighbours don't mind, maybe a pretty spite van with planters or something to put the bike in.
A 'spite van'? I doubt they want to pay for and keep road legal a van to store their bike and there is the possibility that a vehicle that is left on a public road without being moved could be subject to a council order to be removed.
To be fair on local authorities, the process of creating such infrastructure has been legally complex and very slow and expensive in staff resources, the whiners unfortunately are allowed far too much say and consideration, though strangely this appears to be very biased to favour those wishing to protect space for roadside cars and not those who wish to protect roadside trees!
"We will also continue helping individuals, businesses and communities to make more of their journeys by walking, cycling or bus though our tailored travel support and bike loans."
Who can guess what I copied this text from?
What would have been preferrable, would have been an offer from the council to install a railing outside their home to lock their bike to.
Are there bike sheds the councils could use that would fit that cargo bike in it? Can't think how else they could prevent damage to the bike from other road users.
If it was me, I would have knocked out part of the low wall at the front of their property and installed a bike rack to lock the bike to there.
Get a van, put bike in van. Leave van outside house indefinitely. Paint streetside of van in a graffiti style, but not nice graffiti. Anonymous complainer will soon regret their tip-off, if they even live anywhere near that street.
ah - that answers my "Are there bike sheds that would fit that cargo bike"
As always - motor vehicles are the answer....
How about a transit pick-up, then they can still display the planters on the load bed and lock their bike to it, everybody's happy
I think you can park a caravan or trailer for free even in a residents parking bay. So you could get a horse box and stick an immobilser on the wheels and that would make a nice garage for the cargo bike.
Ooh, that's nice, three modes in one space!
Probably wouldn't work as someone would no doubt convince the council that you were trying to get around SORN rules (stabling on-road nag).
If you are referring to a public roadway, trailers need to be attached to a taxed vehicle; the gubment can get antsy if you start playing funny, like dealing with people putting stuff on public roads under ASBO legislation..
Authorities can dispose of an abandoned vehicle immediately if either of the following applies:
it’s only fit to be destroyed
it has no number plates or tax disc (even an expired one)
Pages